Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

micro_httpd VS SimpleHTTPServer

Compare micro_httpd VS SimpleHTTPServer and see what are their differences

1Password
1Password can create strong, unique passwords for you, remember them, and restore them, all directly in your web browser. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

micro_httpd logo micro_httpd

micro_httpd is a very small Unix-based HTTP server.

SimpleHTTPServer logo SimpleHTTPServer

Serve a single directory over HTTP
  • micro_httpd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-06
  • SimpleHTTPServer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-22

micro_httpd features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

SimpleHTTPServer features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    SimpleHTTPServer is extremely easy to use, requiring just a single command to spin up a basic web server, making it ideal for quick testing and development purposes.
  • No Installation Required
    As a standard module in Python 2.7, SimpleHTTPServer does not require any additional installation processes, reducing setup time for developers.
  • Platform Independent
    Being part of Python's standard library, it is platform-independent and can run on any system that supports Python.

Possible disadvantages of SimpleHTTPServer

  • Security
    SimpleHTTPServer lacks security features like HTTPS, authentication mechanisms, and protection against vulnerabilities, which makes it unsuitable for production environments.
  • Limited Functionality
    Designed for serving static files, SimpleHTTPServer lacks advanced functionalities like CGI scripting or integration with databases needed for dynamic content serving.
  • Obsolete
    Being a part of Python 2.7 which is no longer maintained, SimpleHTTPServer is obsolete, and users are encouraged to use Python 3, specifically the http.server module for better functionality and support.
  • Single Threaded
    By default, SimpleHTTPServer handles requests sequentially in a single-threaded manner, which can result in performance bottlenecks when handling multiple requests simultaneously.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to micro_httpd and SimpleHTTPServer)

micro_httpd

SimpleHTTPServer

Web And Application Servers
43 43%
Web And Application Servers
57% 57
Web Servers
31 31%
Web Servers
69% 69
Web Browsers
100 100%
Web Browsers
0% 0
Application Server
0 0%
Application Server
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using micro_httpd and SimpleHTTPServer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing micro_httpd and SimpleHTTPServer, you can also consider the following products

mini_httpd - mini_httpd is a small HTTP server for low or medium traffic sites.

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

thttpd - thttpd is a simple, small, portable, fast, and secure HTTP server.

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

HTTP - is an application protocol for distributed, collaborative, and hypermedia information systems.

lighttpd - A secure, fast, compliant, and very flexible web-server that has been optimized for high-performance environments

Loading...