Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

micro_httpd VS localhost.run

Compare micro_httpd VS localhost.run and see what are their differences

CGPulse
Scan Azure and AWS resources against 621 policy rules. Auto-remediate findings, track compliance frameworks, integrate via API. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Reviews
  3. ยป Alternatives

micro_httpd logo micro_httpd

micro_httpd is a very small Unix-based HTTP server.

localhost.run logo localhost.run

Instantly share your localhost environment!
  • micro_httpd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-06
  • localhost.run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24

micro_httpd features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

localhost.run features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Localhost.run provides a simple way to expose your local server to the internet without requiring complex configurations or additional software installations.
  • No Installation Required
    You can use localhost.run directly from your terminal without the need to install any software or dependencies.
  • Free and Instantaneous
    Localhost.run offers a free service, and you can quickly start tunneling without any wait times or sign-ups.
  • Wide Compatibility
    It works with any web server running on your local machine, making it highly versatile.

Possible disadvantages of localhost.run

  • Stability and Uptime
    As a free service, localhost.run may not be as reliable as paid alternatives, potentially leading to unexpected downtimes.
  • Limited Customization
    Localhost.run doesn't offer many advanced features or customizations, which may be a drawback for more complex use cases.
  • Security
    By exposing your local server to the internet, there could be potential security risks if your server is not properly configured or secured.
  • Performance
    The performance of the tunnel can be slower compared to running the server locally due to additional network hops and bandwidth limitations.

Analysis of micro_httpd

Overall verdict

  • micro_httpd is a solid, minimalist HTTP server that excels at simplicity and low resource usage, making it a good choice for lightweight, non-critical serving needs, though it lacks the features and performance of full-scale servers.

Why this product is good

  • Extremely small and simple codebase that is easy to audit and understand
  • Runs from inetd/xinetd, so it has essentially no memory footprint when idle
  • Handles basic static file serving, directory listings, and common MIME types
  • Free and open source from a reputable author (Jef Poskanzer of acme.com)
  • Portable and easy to compile on most Unix-like systems

Recommended for

  • Serving simple static websites or files with minimal overhead
  • Embedded systems or resource-constrained environments
  • Educational purposes and learning how a basic HTTP server works
  • Low-traffic internal or hobbyist projects that don't need advanced features
  • Situations where a lightweight server run via inetd/xinetd is preferred over a persistent daemon

Analysis of localhost.run

Overall verdict

  • Localhost.run is a good tool for developers who need a fast, efficient, and secure way to share their local development environments. Its ease of use and minimal setup make it an excellent choice for quick sharing and testing scenarios.

Why this product is good

  • Localhost.run is a service that provides a quick and easy way to expose a local server to the internet. It is often praised for its simplicity, ease of use, and minimal setup requirements. It allows developers to share their work quickly for collaboration, testing, or demonstration purposes without needing to deploy to a public server. It uses a secure SSH tunnel, which adds a layer of security to the service.

Recommended for

  • Developers who need to demo their work to clients or teams
  • Collaborative programming and real-time feedback
  • Testing webhooks or APIs from an external source
  • Temporary exposure of local servers for testing purposes

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to micro_httpd and localhost.run)

micro_httpd

localhost.run

Web And Application Servers
100 100%
Web And Application Servers
0% 0
Localhost Tools
0 0%
Localhost Tools
100% 100
Web Browsers
100 100%
Web Browsers
0% 0
Webhooks
0 0%
Webhooks
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using micro_httpd and localhost.run. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare micro_httpd and localhost.run

micro_httpd Reviews

We have no reviews of micro_httpd yet.
Be the first one to post

localhost.run Reviews

Tunnelling services for exposing localhost to the web
localhost.run is very similar to Serveo but with less features. In fact, as far as I can tell, it only does 1 thing: expose your local web server to the web with a public URL. And it does that well enough for me.
Source: chenhuijing.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, localhost.run seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 42 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

micro_httpd mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of micro_httpd yet. Tracking of micro_httpd recommendations started around Mar 2021.

localhost.run mentions (42)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing micro_httpd and localhost.run, you can also consider the following products

thttpd - thttpd is a simple, small, portable, fast, and secure HTTP server.

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

mini_httpd - mini_httpd is a small HTTP server for low or medium traffic sites.

sish - An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.

HTTP - is an application protocol for distributed, collaborative, and hypermedia information systems.

LocalXpose - Your network without the IT work. Radically simple, always-on tunneling service for mission-critical applications.

Loading...