Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

sish VS micro_httpd

Compare sish VS micro_httpd and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

sish logo sish

An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.

micro_httpd logo micro_httpd

micro_httpd is a very small Unix-based HTTP server.
  • sish Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-25
  • micro_httpd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-06

sish features and specs

  • Open Source
    sish is open-source, allowing users to inspect, modify, and contribute to the project's codebase.
  • Self-Hosted
    Users can host their own instance of sish, giving them complete control over their tunneling service and associated data.
  • Simple Setup
    The installation and setup process for sish is straightforward, requiring minimal configuration to get started.
  • Custom Subdomains
    sish allows users to utilize custom subdomains for their tunnels, enhancing branding and easier access.
  • Security Features
    Built-in support for TLS and authentication options, ensuring that tunnels are secure and accessible only to authorized users.
  • Portability
    sish supports multiple platforms, allowing it to be used in various environments such as local development, testing, or cloud deployment.

Possible disadvantages of sish

  • Self-Management
    Users need to manage their own server and configurations, which can require additional maintenance and oversight compared to managed services.
  • Resource Consumption
    Hosting your own instance of sish requires computational resources, which could be a con if the service is heavily used.
  • Complexity for Non-Developers
    Non-developers might find the setup and maintenance process challenging without prior experience in server management and configuration.
  • Limited Community Support
    As a niche project, sish may not have as large of a community or as many resources available for troubleshooting as more popular alternatives.
  • No Built-In Analytics
    Unlike some other tunneling services, sish does not provide built-in analytics or monitoring tools, requiring users to implement their own solutions.

micro_httpd features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis of sish

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Sish is considered a good choice for those looking for a straightforward tunneling solution, especially if they are familiar with SSH. It provides reliable service without the need for complex setups, making it a popular option among developers who prefer lightweight and open-source tools.

Why this product is good

  • Sish is a simple, open-source tool that allows users to serve local applications over the internet using SSH. It's appreciated for its ease of use, minimal configuration, and the ability to handle dynamic port forwarding, making it suitable for both individual developers and small teams seeking an alternative to Ngrok or similar services.

Recommended for

  • Developers who are familiar with SSH and want a simple way to expose their local applications.
  • Teams looking for a free and open-source alternative to paid tunneling services like Ngrok.
  • Individuals who need to quickly share a local application without involving complex configurations.
  • Developers working on side projects or prototypes who need a temporary way to test webhooks or collaborate over the internet.

Analysis of micro_httpd

Overall verdict

  • micro_httpd is a solid, minimalist HTTP server that excels at simplicity and low resource usage, making it a good choice for lightweight, non-critical serving needs, though it lacks the features and performance of full-scale servers.

Why this product is good

  • Extremely small and simple codebase that is easy to audit and understand
  • Runs from inetd/xinetd, so it has essentially no memory footprint when idle
  • Handles basic static file serving, directory listings, and common MIME types
  • Free and open source from a reputable author (Jef Poskanzer of acme.com)
  • Portable and easy to compile on most Unix-like systems

Recommended for

  • Serving simple static websites or files with minimal overhead
  • Embedded systems or resource-constrained environments
  • Educational purposes and learning how a basic HTTP server works
  • Low-traffic internal or hobbyist projects that don't need advanced features
  • Situations where a lightweight server run via inetd/xinetd is preferred over a persistent daemon

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to sish and micro_httpd)
Localhost Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Web And Application Servers
Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Web Browsers
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using sish and micro_httpd. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, sish seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

sish mentions (17)

View more

micro_httpd mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of micro_httpd yet. Tracking of micro_httpd recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing sish and micro_httpd, you can also consider the following products

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

thttpd - thttpd is a simple, small, portable, fast, and secure HTTP server.

localhost.run - Instantly share your localhost environment!

mini_httpd - mini_httpd is a small HTTP server for low or medium traffic sites.

Portmap.io - Expose your local PC to Internet from behind firewall and without real IP address

HTTP - is an application protocol for distributed, collaborative, and hypermedia information systems.