Mend.io
Snyk
FOSSA
Vulmon Alerts
Aikido Security
WhiteSource
vulert
SecAlerts.co
Cppcheck
Clang Static Analyzer
Coverity Scan
lgtm.com
SonarQube
VisualCodeGrepper
Flawfinder
Parasoft C/C++test
Mend.io delivers the first AI native application security platform built for software created by both humans and machines. It empowers organizations to secure AI generated code and embedded AI components like models, agents, MCPs, and RAG pipelines. The unified platform brings together comprehensive capabilities including AI security, SAST, SCA, container scanning, and Mend Renovate providing development and security teams complete visibility into risks across their codebase.
With AI powered remediation and prioritization workflows, teams are enabled to quickly resolve issues and reduce risk. With a simple, predictable price model, eliminating per-module costs and minimal reliance on expensive professional services Mend.io is a scalable, proactive, developer-friendly platform for modern AppSecโall in a single platform.
Mend.io CppcheckCppcheck is recommended for C/C++ developers and development teams, particularly those responsible for maintaining large codebases or projects where code quality and reliability are paramount. It is also beneficial for educational purposes, where students and new developers can learn about potential pitfalls in C/C++ programming.
Based on our record, Cppcheck seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 3 years ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: over 3 years ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: over 3 years ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 3 years ago
Snyk - Snyk helps you use open source and stay secure. Continuously find and fix vulnerabilities for npm, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, PyPI and much more.
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
FOSSA - Open source license compliance and dependency analysis
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
Vulmon Alerts - Vulmon Alerts provides vulnerability notification service. Vulmon Alerts is how you proactively detect vulnerabilities. Subscribe to any query related to vulnerabilities and get alerted before hackers.
lgtm.com - lgtm.com is a platform for code analytics.