Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Measure.sh VS Continue.dev

Compare Measure.sh VS Continue.dev and see what are their differences

Measure.sh

Measure helps mobile teams monitor and fix crashes, ANRs, bugs, and performance issues. The open source alternative to Firebase Crashlytics.

Rating
5.0 · 1 review
Pricing
Open source Freemium Free trial $25 / Monthly (25GB of log/metric/ traces/session replay)
Alternatives Is it good?
Continue.dev

Continue is the leading open-source AI code assistant. You can connect any models and any context to build custom autocomplete and chat experiences inside VS Code and JetBrains.

No screenshot yet
Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
happySEO
Create ai humanized SEO content tailored for ecommerce and small businesses with HappySEO tools. From ai writer to keyword research and analyze tools. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Continue.dev seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 3 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 3
Mobile Analytics popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
9 vs 52

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Measure.sh
Continue.dev
Website measure.sh docs.continue.dev
Pricing
Open source Freemium Free trial $25 / Monthly (25GB of log/metric/ traces/session replay) Official pricing
—
Platforms
React Native Android iOS Flutter Kotlin Multiplatform +2
—
Company Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2024 —
Listed in
Observability APM Error Monitoring Mobile Analytics Bug Reporting User Monitoring Monitoring Tools Developer Tools Error Tracking Exception Monitoring Crash Reporting +8
AI Developer Tools Coding Code Autocomplete +1

About Measure.sh and Continue.dev

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Measure.sh
Continue.dev

Measure is an open source mobile observability platform built for production debugging. It helps mobile teams find and fix crashes, ANRs, UI freezes, slow API chains and edge-case state bugs, the failures that crash reporters never show you. Most crash tools tell you that an app broke. Measure...

Read more about Measure.sh

No description of Continue.dev yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Measure.sh 8 features
Continue.dev 5 features
  • Crash Reporting
    Crashes and ANRs with symbolicated stacktraces, grouping and version impact
  • Session Replay
    Session Timeline replays every user action, screen, network call, log and system metric
  • Performance Monitoring
    Traces, app launch times, network latency and app health metrics per release
  • Bug Reporting
    Shake the device to file a bug, attached to the full session that led to it
  • Network Monitoring
    Request latency, status codes and failing endpoints, tied to the session
  • User Journeys
    See how users move between screens and where they drop off
  • AI Debugging
    Measure Agent plus an MCP server so coding agents can read production sessions
  • Adaptive Capture
    Dial data collection up or down remotely, without shipping a new release
  • Seamless Integration
    Continue.dev offers seamless integration with popular Integrated Development Environments (IDEs), allowing users to enhance their existing workflows without substantial changes.
  • Code Generation
    It provides robust code generation features that can increase productivity by automating repetitive coding tasks, saving developers time and effort.
  • Ease of Use
    The platform's user-friendly interface and clear documentation make it easy for developers to get started quickly, even with limited prior experience.
  • Community Support
    Continue.dev has an active community and support system, which can help users troubleshoot issues and share best practices.
  • Real-time Collaboration
    The platform supports real-time collaboration features that can help teams work together more efficiently, facilitating better communication and project management.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, there is still a learning curve for new users, particularly for those unfamiliar with AI-assisted development tools.
  • Dependency on IDE
    The performance and utility of Continue.dev heavily depend on its integration with specific IDEs, which might not suit developers using other environments.
  • Subscription Costs
    Access to the full feature set may require a subscription, which might be a consideration for small teams or individual developers with limited budgets.
  • Privacy Concerns
    As with many AI-driven tools, there could be privacy concerns related to code and data sharing, which organizations need to manage carefully.
  • Limited Offline Functionality
    The tool may offer limited functionality when offline, which could be a drawback for developers working in environments with unstable internet access.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Measure.sh 1 video + Add
Continue.dev 2 videos + Add

Measure.sh: open source crash and performance monitoring for mobile apps (demo)

CONTINUE.DEV HONEST REVIEW: WORTH IT AI CODE ASSISTANT?

More videos

  • - Continue.dev vs. Cline: The Best Coding Assistant for VSCode?

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Measure.sh
Continue.dev
100% 100%
Mobile Analytics
0% 0%
0% 0%
AI
100% 100%
100% 100%
APM
0% 0%
0% 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Measure.sh and Continue.dev.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

Measure.sh's answer

Porsche, Astro, Hoichoi

What's the story behind your product?

Measure.sh's answer

Measure grew out of a problem its founders kept running into. Between them they had led mobile engineering at companies including Gojek, Rapido and Groww, including the years when Gojek's app scaled from around 10,000 to 35 million daily active users. At each company they ended up building similar internal tooling to answer the same question: why is the app slow, frozen or broken for a real user in production when crash reporting shows nothing wrong? After rebuilding versions of the same tool more than once, they decided to apply the DRY principle to the problem itself and turn it into a product instead of another internal project. Measure was released publicly in September 2024 and is developed in the open under the Apache 2.0 license, with the roadmap and issues visible on GitHub.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Measure.sh's answer

Mobile engineering teams running consumer apps in production, especially at high growth companies where app quality has a direct effect on revenue and retention. Typical users are Android and iOS engineers, mobile platform and foundation teams, mobile leads and engineering managers who are accountable for crash free rates, ANRs, startup time and release health, along with the CTOs and VPs of Engineering who own those outcomes. Because Measure is open source and can be self hosted, it also fits teams with strict data residency or privacy requirements, and smaller teams looking for an open alternative to Firebase Crashlytics.

What makes your product unique?

Measure.sh's answer

Measure.sh is an open source observability platform built specifically for mobile apps, rather than a mobile SDK attached to a backend monitoring product. Its defining capability is the session timeline, which reconstructs a complete user session including interactions, navigations, network calls, logs, lifecycle events and CPU and memory signals. This allows teams to diagnose problems that never produce a crash, such as ANRs, UI freezes, slow API chains and edge case state bugs. Measure also provides Adaptive Capture, which lets teams change what data is collected remotely without shipping an app update, and an MCP server that exposes crashes, traces and sessions to coding agents. It is available as a managed cloud service or fully self hosted, and is licensed under Apache 2.0.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Measure.sh's answer

  • Mobile first by design. Measure is built by mobile engineers for mobile teams, not adapted from a web or backend APM tool.
  • Full session context. Session replays and timelines show the user actions, navigations, network calls and logs that led to an issue, not just a stack trace.
  • Coverage beyond crashes. Crashes, ANRs, performance traces, network performance, bug reports, user journeys and app health metrics live in a single dashboard.
  • Open source and self hostable. Apache 2.0 licensed, so teams can keep all app and user data inside their own infrastructure.
  • Cost control. Per GB pricing combined with Adaptive Capture, which lets teams increase data collection during a risky release and reduce it afterwards without shipping an app update.
  • Broad platform support. Android, iOS, Flutter, React Native and Kotlin Multiplatform.
  • Agent ready. An MCP server exposes errors, traces and session data to coding agents and Slack for natural language debugging.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Measure.sh's answer

  • Backend services: Go
  • Dashboard: TypeScript, React and Next.js
  • Data stores: ClickHouse for events, sessions and traces, PostgreSQL for application data
  • Streaming and caching: Apache Iggy and Valkey
  • Object storage: S3 compatible storage, with MinIO used in self hosted deployments
  • Symbolication: Symbolicator for native and mobile stack traces
  • SDKs: Kotlin for Android, Swift for iOS, Dart for Flutter, and TypeScript for React Native, plus Kotlin Multiplatform support
  • Deployment: Docker and Docker Compose for self hosting
  • License: Apache 2.0, with the full source available on GitHub at github.com/measure-sh/measure

User comments

Share your experience with using Measure.sh and Continue.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Measure.sh 5.0 · 1 review
Continue.dev no reviews yet
  • Modern and AI native tooling for observability of mobile apps
    SaaSHub review
    · Sep 2026

    If you're looking for a modern and AI native tool for observability of mobile apps, then measure.sh is the right choice for the job It has a lot of innovative tools and a very nice dashboard for the same "Session...

We have no reviews of Continue.dev yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Measure.sh 0 mentions
Continue.dev 3 mentions

Tracking Measure.sh since Sep 2026.

  • Feeding BrassCoders Output to Any AI Coding Assistant
    Check Continue's documentation for the current @file syntax in your version, as context-provider behavior has evolved across releases. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Using GitHub MCP With Continue to Review PRs and Issues 5 Faster
    # This is an example configuration file # To learn more, see the full config.yaml reference: https://docs.continue.dev/reference Name: Example Config Version: 1.0.0 Schema: v1 # Define which models can be used #... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • When AI Assistants Meet Your VS Code Setup
    The Setup Reality: Installing Continue was straightforward since it functions as VS Code extension. There’s a bit of a jump to configure. I was using Agent mode, and some of the settings have to be changed on the web UI. Right now, I’m... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Alternatives to Measure.sh and Continue.dev

When comparing Measure.sh and Continue.dev, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...