MDB for Angular VS Ember-cli

• Comprehensive UI Kit
  MDB for Angular offers a rich set of pre-designed components, which can significantly speed up the development process by providing ready-to-use UI elements that adhere to Material Design specifications.
• Responsive Design
  The components provided by MDB are fully responsive. This ensures that the application will look good on all device sizes without requiring substantial additional work.
• Integration with Bootstrap
  MDB for Angular seamlessly integrates Bootstrap with Angular, combining the flexibility and design capabilities of Bootstrap with Angular's robustness, creating a powerful development environment.
• Customization Options
  MDB provides various customization options, allowing developers to easily tweak the design to fit their specific requirements and maintain brand consistency.
• Extensive Documentation
  Comprehensive documentation and tutorials are available, which help in understanding the components and implementing them effectively, thus reducing the learning curve for new users.

Possible disadvantages

• Learning Curve
  While MDB provides comprehensive components, beginners might find the initial setup and deeper customization options challenging and require time to familiarize themselves with the framework.
• Dependency on Bootstrap
  MDB heavily relies on Bootstrap, which means developers need a good understanding of both frameworks. It might also lead to conflicts if another responsive system is preferred.
• Potential Overhead
  Including a comprehensive library like MDB may add unnecessary overhead to the project, especially if only a few components are used, potentially impacting performance.
• Cost for Pro Features
  While the basic features of MDB are free, access to premium components and advanced functionalities requires a paid subscription, which may not be suitable for all projects.
• Limited Community Support
  Despite growing popularity, MDB does not have as large a community as other frameworks, which could result in fewer community-driven resources, third-party plugins, and troubleshooting assistance.

• Convention over Configuration
  Ember-cli enforces strong conventions for file structure, naming, and project organization, which reduces decision fatigue and makes it easier for developers to jump between different Ember projects with minimal onboarding time.
• Built-in Tooling
  Comes with a robust set of built-in tools including a development server, testing framework integration (QUnit), asset compilation, and live reload, reducing the need to manually configure and integrate third-party build tools.
• Addon Ecosystem
  Ember-cli supports a rich ecosystem of addons that can be easily installed and integrated into projects, allowing developers to extend functionality without reinventing the wheel for common features.
• Blueprints and Generators
  Provides powerful generator commands (blueprints) that scaffold components, routes, models, and other application pieces quickly, speeding up development and ensuring consistency across the codebase.
• Stable Long-term Support
  Ember-cli follows Ember's release cycle with clear LTS (Long Term Support) versions, providing stability and predictability for teams maintaining large applications over time.

Possible disadvantages

• Steep Learning Curve
  The strict conventions and unique architecture of Ember-cli can be difficult for newcomers to learn, especially those coming from more flexible frameworks or with no prior Ember experience.
• Smaller Community Compared to Alternatives
  Compared to tools like Vite, Webpack, or CRA used with React/Vue, Ember-cli has a smaller community and ecosystem, which can mean fewer third-party resources, tutorials, and community-driven troubleshooting.
• Build Performance
  For large applications, Ember-cli's build process can become slow, and while improvements have been made with embroider, some developers still report slower build times compared to more modern bundlers.
• Rigid Structure
  The opinionated nature of Ember-cli, while helpful for consistency, can feel restrictive for developers who prefer more flexibility in structuring their applications or adopting non-standard patterns.
• Migration Complexity
  Upgrading between major Ember-cli versions or migrating to newer build systems like Embroider can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for older or heavily customized applications.

No analysis of MDB for Angular yet.

• moving to mdbootstrap from bootstrap?

  It depends on your project. Anything that works in Bootstrap will also work in MDBootstrap. However, if you used a lot of custom stuff or external plugins in your project - then you will have more complications. However, if you are... Source: over 3 years ago

• Help! Why does chrome console inner text and my program inner text not return the same values? (spent nearly the whole day trying to extract an element). Turned to reddit as its always had the best community. Any help is MASSIVELY appreciated. Puppeteer!!

  The webpage is LinkedIn.com. While this isn’t a framework, I know that are using https://cli.emberjs.com/release/. Source: about 5 years ago