
UserTesting.com
Hotjar
Sprig
Dovetail
Betafi
Lyssna
UXArmy
Beautiful & actionable analytics for InVision prototypes

ngrok
sish
Pinggy.io
LocalXpose
Pagekite
Localtunnel
zrok
Instantly share your localhost environment!

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, localhost.run seems to be a lot more popular than Maze. While we know about 42 links to localhost.run, we've tracked only 1 mention of Maze.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | maze.design | localhost.run |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Maze yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
The Maze Runner - Movie Review
More videos
No localhost.run videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Maze and localhost.run. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Maze is a specialist tool for rapid prototyping and unmoderated user testing. It allows product teams to turn Figma designs into interactive "missions" to collect quantitative data (misclick rates, heatmaps, and...
Thinking of hopping on Maze and a secondary user feedback that might cost you over $150 monthly? Well, think again. With Crowd, you get all of this without breaking the bank. Merge quantitative data (like CSAT and NPS...
Maze doesn’t yet offer the ability to host fully-integrated moderated tests. The current moderated research solutions include Interview Studies to help you gain insight from users faster. Maze also offers Clips,...
localhost.run is very similar to Serveo but with less features. In fact, as far as I can tell, it only does 1 thing: expose your local web server to the web with a public URL. And it does that well enough for me.
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Hi, I am doing research on some of the user testing tools out there like lookback.io, Marvelapp.com, maze.design, usabilityhub.com, userbrain.net, usertesting.com, userzoom.com. I would like to know about your experience. Source: about 4 years ago
- This asciinema: https://asciinema.org/a/674501?t=111 Any unix machine (currently only fedora and debian based distro dependencies are auto installed. Passwordless sudo recommended) with tmux if you run this ssh command you’ll get a... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Localhost.run - Simple hosted SSH option. Supports custom domains for a cost. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Localhost.run — Expose locally running servers over a tunnel to a public URL. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
When comparing Maze and localhost.run, you can also consider the following products.

Usability testing has never been easier. Get videos of real people speaking their thoughts as they use websites, mobile apps, prototypes and more!
Compare UserTesting.com to Maze or localhost.run:

ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.
Compare ngrok to Maze or localhost.run:

The #1 Leader in Heatmaps, Recordings, Surveys & More. Sign up for a 15-day free trial and start learning from real user behavior today!
Compare Hotjar to Maze or localhost.run:

An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.
Compare sish to Maze or localhost.run:

Delivering locally-sourced, seasonal, sustainable lunches and dinners.
Compare Sprig to Maze or localhost.run:

Public URLs for localhost without downloading any binary
Compare Pinggy.io to Maze or localhost.run: