Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Materialize CSS VS Pickode

Compare Materialize CSS VS Pickode and see what are their differences

Materialize CSS

A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
To be Vibe Voted
Alternatives Is it good?
Pickode

Browser extension that exports any section to React, Tailwind, Vue, Astro, Bricks, Elementor or Webflow using only authored CSS, then audits the site.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium Free trial $6 / Monthly (All export formats, 3 browsers, 7-day trial)
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
Thalam
OpenAI-compatible API gateway for GPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Qwen, Kling and more. One key, one endpoint, one bill. Pay per token, no lock-in. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Materialize CSS seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 28 times since March 2021.

social mentions
28 vs 0
Design Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 4

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Materialize CSS
Pickode
Website materializecss.com pickode.com
Pricing
Open source
Freemium Free trial $6 / Monthly (All export formats, 3 browsers, 7-day trial) Official pricing
Company — Startup from Italy · 2026
Listed in
CSS Framework Design Tools Developer Tools Development Tools +1
Chrome Extensions Browser Extensions Firefox Extensions Productivity Developer Tools +2

About Materialize CSS and Pickode

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Materialize CSS
Pickode

No description of Materialize CSS yet.

Pickode reads the site’s original stylesheets instead. Select a section, pick a format, and you get the rules the author actually wrote: media queries, hover and focus states, ::before/::after and CSS variables included. You can export to HTML + CSS, React (JSX + CSS or Tailwind), Vue, Astro (a...

Read more about Pickode

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Materialize CSS 5 features
Pickode 10 features
  • Responsive Design
    Materialize CSS provides a responsive grid system, making it easier to create layouts that work well on various screen sizes and devices.
  • Material Design
    Adheres to Google's Material Design principles, offering a modern and professional look that is consistent across web applications.
  • Component Variety
    Offers a wide range of pre-built components, including forms, buttons, cards, and navigation bars, which helps speed up development.
  • Customization
    Provides options to customize components using Sass, making it flexible for specific design needs.
  • Built-in JavaScript
    Includes built-in JavaScript components like modals, carousels, and tabs, which enhance functionality without requiring additional libraries.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    Although it follows Material Design guidelines, there is a learning curve associated with understanding and implementing its various components and classes.
  • File Size
    Including the full library can make your project heavier, affecting load times, especially for users on slower connections.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customizable, deeply customizing or overriding default styles can sometimes be complicated and time-consuming.
  • Dependency on jQuery
    Some components still rely on jQuery, adding to the library size and potentially conflicting with modern JavaScript practices.
  • Community Support
    Compared to larger frameworks like Bootstrap, Materialize CSS has a smaller community, which can result in fewer third-party resources and plugins.
  • Export from authored CSS
    Reads the site’s original stylesheets, so you keep media queries, hover states and CSS variables.
  • React, Tailwind, Vue and Astro
    Export any section as JSX + CSS, Tailwind classes, a Vue SFC or an Astro component or project.
  • Bricks, Elementor and Webflow
    Paste into Bricks or the Webflow Designer with ⌘V, or import an Elementor template with native widgets.
  • Inspector with live editing
    Box model, fonts, colors and contrast. Edit CSS live, measure distances and add rulers and guides.
  • Design tokens
    Colors by role, spacing, type scale, radii and shadows as CSS variables, Tailwind @theme or theme.json.
  • Client report
    One HTML file with a screenshot, scores and fixes ranked by priority. Prints to PDF.
  • WordPress and WooCommerce panel
    Theme, child theme, plugins with versions, page builder, WooCommerce setup and cache headers.
  • Audits
    Performance with Web Vitals, accessibility with axe-core and a contrast map, SEO, indexing and AI search readiness.
  • Assets and streaming video
    Download images, SVG, fonts and Lottie animations, and save HLS and DASH streams as one MP4.
  • Runs in your browser
    No Pickode server and no account to start. Chrome, Edge, Brave and Firefox.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Materialize CSS
Pickode

Overall verdict

  • Materialize CSS is a good choice if you're looking for a framework that emphasizes Material Design and comes with a sleek, modern interface. It's particularly useful for developers who want to quickly integrate Google's design philosophy without delving into custom styling or layout creation.

Why this product is good

  • Materialize CSS is a front-end framework based on Material Design principles developed by Google. It provides a comprehensive set of UI components that help developers create visually appealing and responsive web applications quickly. The framework includes a variety of pre-styled components like buttons, forms, cards, and much more, which adhere to the Material Design guidelines. This consistency in design components helps ensure a cohesive and professional look across web applications. Additionally, it simplifies responsive design with a grid system that's easy to implement, and it comes with excellent documentation and a supportive community.

Recommended for

    Materialize CSS is recommended for teams and developers who prefer Google's Material Design aesthetic, are building applications with a focus on rapid UI development, and value consistency and ease of use. It's also great for projects where a pre-existing UI library speeds up the development process, such as prototypes, admin dashboards, or smaller web applications. However, for highly customized UI components or non-Material Design projects, other frameworks might be more suitable.

No analysis of Pickode yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Materialize CSS 1 video + Add
Pickode 1 video + Add

Build A Travel Agency Theme With Materialize CSS 1.0.0

Pickode: copy any website as clean code, then audit it (Chrome extension)

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Materialize CSS
Pickode
100% 100%
Design Tools
0% 0%
0% 0%
Firefox Extensions
100% 100%
100% 100%
CSS Framework
0% 0%
0% 0%
Productivity
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Materialize CSS and Pickode.

What makes your product unique?

Pickode's answer:

Most tools that copy a section from a website read the styles the browser computed, so you get long code and lose the responsive rules. Pickode reads the site’s original stylesheets and keeps what the author wrote: media queries, hover and focus states, CSS variables. From there it exports to code (React, Tailwind, Vue, Astro, HTML + CSS) and to three page builders. In Bricks and in the Webflow Designer you paste with ⌘V. For Elementor you import a template with native widgets.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Pickode's answer:

If your work ends in a builder or in a client meeting. Pickode puts exports and audits in one extension: you can copy a section into Bricks, Elementor or Webflow, then check the same site’s WordPress setup, speed, accessibility and indexing, and send the client one report. The free plan has no time limit and includes real exports (5 HTML + CSS a week), and the 7-day Pro trial doesn’t ask for a card or an account. It’s not the right pick if you need whole-page exports or an API: other tools do those today, Pickode doesn’t yet.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Pickode's answer:

Web designers, front-end developers, freelancers and small agencies. A lot of them build with WordPress, Bricks, Elementor or Webflow. They already know DevTools and want to spend less time copying values out of it, whether they’re rebuilding a section, migrating a client’s site or auditing it before a quote.

What's the story behind your product?

Pickode's answer:

I’m a web developer in Italy. I built Pickode because I was tired of rebuilding CSS by hand from DevTools. Copying a section always gave me resolved pixels and no breakpoints, and pasting HTML into a page builder gave me one block I couldn’t edit. So I started with an inspector that reads the original stylesheets, then added the builders I use and the audits I run for clients. I build it on my own, and support emails come straight to me.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Pickode's answer:

A Manifest V3 browser extension written in plain JavaScript, with no build step and no remote code. The interface lives in a Shadow DOM so it doesn’t clash with the page’s styles. Accessibility checks use axe-core and ZIP files are made with JSZip. Licensing goes through Freemius, and library sync uses the Google Drive API with access to Pickode’s own files only. The website is built with Astro and runs on Cloudflare.

User comments

Share your experience with using Materialize CSS and Pickode. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Materialize CSS no reviews yet
Pickode no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of Pickode yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Materialize CSS 28 mentions
Pickode 0 mentions
  • JavaScript Awesome Package
    Materialize - Responsive front-end framework based on Material Design. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Mistakes Were Made
    Sure, why not use Blazor? It makes life easier for the developers who are primarily backend, to work on the frontend as well. Seems like the better choice. So what's next? The UI library. No shade to the long-time standing Bootstrap, but... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Top 5 Best CSS Frameworks for Responsive Web Design in 2024
    Materialize is a modern CSS framework based on Google’s Material Design. It was created and designed by Google to provide a unified and consistent user interface across all its products. Materialize is focused on user experience as it... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

View more

Tracking Pickode since Oct 2026.

Alternatives to Materialize CSS and Pickode

When comparing Materialize CSS and Pickode, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...