Software Alternatives & Startups

Materialize CSS VS FIND@

Compare Materialize CSS VS FIND@ and see what are their differences

Materialize CSS

A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
FIND@

Short links, QR codes, Bio pages, booking and websites — Find@ is your all-in-one link platform used by creators and businesses worldwide. You own your audience data. Track clicks in real time. Free to start. — FIND@.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium Free trial
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Materialize CSS seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 28 times since March 2021.

social mentions
28 vs 0
Design Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 19

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Materialize CSS
FIND@
Website materializecss.com find.at
Pricing
Open source
Freemium Free trial Official pricing
Company — 2026
Listed in

About Materialize CSS and FIND@

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Materialize CSS
FIND@

No description of Materialize CSS yet.

Find@ is a digital identity platform combining Short links, QR codes, Bio pages, booking, websites and analytics — built for creators, athletes, and businesses.

Read more about FIND@

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Materialize CSS 5 features
FIND@ 0 features
  • Responsive Design
    Materialize CSS provides a responsive grid system, making it easier to create layouts that work well on various screen sizes and devices.
  • Material Design
    Adheres to Google's Material Design principles, offering a modern and professional look that is consistent across web applications.
  • Component Variety
    Offers a wide range of pre-built components, including forms, buttons, cards, and navigation bars, which helps speed up development.
  • Customization
    Provides options to customize components using Sass, making it flexible for specific design needs.
  • Built-in JavaScript
    Includes built-in JavaScript components like modals, carousels, and tabs, which enhance functionality without requiring additional libraries.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    Although it follows Material Design guidelines, there is a learning curve associated with understanding and implementing its various components and classes.
  • File Size
    Including the full library can make your project heavier, affecting load times, especially for users on slower connections.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customizable, deeply customizing or overriding default styles can sometimes be complicated and time-consuming.
  • Dependency on jQuery
    Some components still rely on jQuery, adding to the library size and potentially conflicting with modern JavaScript practices.
  • Community Support
    Compared to larger frameworks like Bootstrap, Materialize CSS has a smaller community, which can result in fewer third-party resources and plugins.

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Materialize CSS
FIND@

Overall verdict

  • Materialize CSS is a good choice if you're looking for a framework that emphasizes Material Design and comes with a sleek, modern interface. It's particularly useful for developers who want to quickly integrate Google's design philosophy without delving into custom styling or layout creation.

Why this product is good

  • Materialize CSS is a front-end framework based on Material Design principles developed by Google. It provides a comprehensive set of UI components that help developers create visually appealing and responsive web applications quickly. The framework includes a variety of pre-styled components like buttons, forms, cards, and much more, which adhere to the Material Design guidelines. This consistency in design components helps ensure a cohesive and professional look across web applications. Additionally, it simplifies responsive design with a grid system that's easy to implement, and it comes with excellent documentation and a supportive community.

Recommended for

    Materialize CSS is recommended for teams and developers who prefer Google's Material Design aesthetic, are building applications with a focus on rapid UI development, and value consistency and ease of use. It's also great for projects where a pre-existing UI library speeds up the development process, such as prototypes, admin dashboards, or smaller web applications. However, for highly customized UI components or non-Material Design projects, other frameworks might be more suitable.

Overall verdict

  • FIND@ (find.at) appears to be a niche or lesser-known online tool, and there is limited independent, verifiable information available about its features, reliability, or user reception. Without substantial user reviews, security audits, or documented track record, it's difficult to fully endorse it as a proven or widely trusted service.

Why this product is good

  • May offer a simple, lightweight solution for basic needs like link management or similar functionality
  • Could be cost-effective compared to larger, more established competitors
  • Might work well for very specific or narrow use cases if it matches your exact requirements

Recommended for

  • Users seeking a low-commitment trial for very specific, narrow use cases
  • Individuals comfortable testing newer or smaller platforms with limited public track record
  • Those who have already vetted the specific features and confirmed they meet their needs directly with the provider
  • Not recommended for users requiring extensive support, proven security, or enterprise-level reliability

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Materialize CSS 1 video + Add
FIND@ 0 videos + Add

Build A Travel Agency Theme With Materialize CSS 1.0.0

No FIND@ videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Materialize CSS
FIND@
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Materialize CSS and FIND@.

What makes your product unique?

FIND@'s answer:

Find@ combines bio pages, branded short links, dynamic QR codes, and analytics into a single digital identity platform. Unlike basic link-in-bio tools, Find@ is built as identity infrastructure — with a developer API, verification system, and canonical routing logic that gives users permanent ownership over their name, traffic, and audience.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

FIND@'s answer:

Find@ is not a landing page builder — it is a routing and identity ownership layer. It offers per-link analytics, geo and device targeting, custom domains, a public API, and a verification system in one platform. Users who need more than a styled list of links choose Find@ because it treats digital identity as infrastructure, not decoration.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

FIND@'s answer:

Creators, athletes, agencies, and businesses who want permanent control over their online identity and audience routing — independent of any single social platform. Find@ is used by individuals managing personal brands and by teams managing multiple client presences.

What's the story behind your product?

FIND@'s answer:

Find@ was built as part of XZ Global, a vertically integrated digital ecosystem. The core idea: social platforms own the audience relationship, and creators needed a neutral layer they actually control. Find@ launched as that layer — combining identity, routing, and analytics into one owned infrastructure point.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

FIND@'s answer:

Find@ runs on a custom SaaS stack hosted on XZG Cloud infrastructure.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

FIND@'s answer:

  • Combat sports athletes and fighters managing their personal brand
  • Fitness influencers and content creators
  • Small businesses and local service providers
  • Agencies managing multiple client presences
  • Authors and public figures
  • Gyms and sports clubs​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

User comments

Share your experience with using Materialize CSS and FIND@. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Materialize CSS no reviews yet
FIND@ no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of FIND@ yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Materialize CSS 28 mentions
FIND@ 0 mentions
  • JavaScript Awesome Package
    Materialize - Responsive front-end framework based on Material Design. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Mistakes Were Made
    Sure, why not use Blazor? It makes life easier for the developers who are primarily backend, to work on the frontend as well. Seems like the better choice. So what's next? The UI library. No shade to the long-time standing Bootstrap, but... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Top 5 Best CSS Frameworks for Responsive Web Design in 2024
    Materialize is a modern CSS framework based on Google’s Material Design. It was created and designed by Google to provide a unified and consistent user interface across all its products. Materialize is focused on user experience as it... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

View more

Tracking FIND@ since Apr 2026.

Alternatives to Materialize CSS and FIND@

When comparing Materialize CSS and FIND@, you can also consider the following products.