Software Alternatives & Startups

MASV VS CloudLinux

Compare MASV VS CloudLinux and see what are their differences

MASV

The Fastest Large File Transfer Service For Media

Rating
0 reviews
CloudLinux

Making Linux secure, stable, and profitable for thousands of hosting providers and data centers worldwide.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, MASV seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 27 times since March 2021.

social mentions
27 vs 0
File Sharing popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

MASV
CloudLinux
Website masv.io cloudlinux.com
Pricing
Open source
Listed in

About MASV and CloudLinux

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

MASV
CloudLinux

MASV is a secure cloud software company designed to quickly transfer heavy media files worldwide to meet fast-paced production schedules. Global media organizations rely on MASV to automatically deliver their large files without any restrictions, allowing them to concentrate on their next big...

Read more about MASV

No description of CloudLinux yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

MASV 7 features
CloudLinux 5 features
  • High Transfer Speeds
    MASV is optimized for delivering large files quickly, often outperforming traditional file transfer solutions in speed.
  • Scalability
    The platform is designed to handle very large files, making it suitable for industries like media production where transferring terabytes of data is common.
  • Ease of Use
    MASV provides a user-friendly interface, making it easy for users to upload, share, and download files without complicated setups.
  • Security
    Files transferred via MASV are encrypted in transit and at rest, ensuring a high level of data security.
  • No File Size Limit
    Unlike many other file transfer services, MASV has no file size limits, allowing users to send extremely large files without having to split them.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    MASV works on various operating systems and browsers, offering broad compatibility that suits diverse user needs.
  • Customizable Branding
    The platform allows businesses to brand their file transfer portals, providing a more professional appearance.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    MASV charges on a pay-as-you-go basis, which can become expensive compared to other services that offer flat-rate pricing.
  • Dependence on Internet Speed
    The service delivers high performance primarily when users have fast internet connections, which could be a limitation in areas with slower networks.
  • Limited Free Tier
    MASV offers a limited free trial, after which users must pay to continue using the service, potentially limiting access for casual or infrequent users.
  • Integration Complexity
    While MASV offers API integrations, setting them up can be complex and might require technical expertise.
  • No Permanent File Storage
    Files are stored temporarily (up to 10 days by default), meaning MASV is not suitable as a long-term storage solution.
  • Lack of Collaboration Features
    Unlike some other file transfer platforms, MASV lacks built-in tools for team collaboration and project management.
  • Enhanced Server Stability
    CloudLinux uses its lightweight virtualization technology (LVE) to isolate each tenant on a shared hosting server, preventing any single user from consuming excessive resources and crashing the server for everyone else. This ensures consistent uptime and performance.
  • Improved Security with HardenedPHP and KernelCare
    CloudLinux offers HardenedPHP, which patches old and unsupported PHP versions against known vulnerabilities, and KernelCare, which provides live kernel patching without requiring server reboots. These features significantly enhance server security posture.
  • Resource Limit Management
    Administrators can set granular resource limits (CPU, memory, I/O, number of processes, etc.) per user account using LVE Manager. This makes it easy to manage shared hosting environments and ensure fair resource distribution among tenants.
  • CageFS File System Virtualization
    CageFS creates a virtualized file system for each user, preventing them from seeing other users on the server, viewing sensitive configuration files, or exploiting server vulnerabilities. This adds an important layer of isolation and security.
  • Wide Compatibility with Hosting Panels
    CloudLinux integrates seamlessly with popular hosting control panels such as cPanel, Plesk, and DirectAdmin, making it straightforward for hosting providers to adopt without overhauling their existing infrastructure or workflows.

Possible disadvantages

  • Additional Licensing Cost
    CloudLinux requires a paid monthly or annual license on top of the base server cost. For smaller hosting providers or individual server owners, this additional expense can add up and may not always be justifiable compared to free alternatives.
  • Limited to CentOS/RHEL-Based Systems
    CloudLinux is built on top of RHEL/CentOS and does not support other Linux distributions like Ubuntu or Debian. This limits its adoption for hosting providers who prefer or already run non-RHEL-based environments.
  • Learning Curve for Configuration
    While CloudLinux provides powerful resource management tools, properly configuring LVE limits, CageFS, PHP Selector, and other features requires a solid understanding of the platform. Misconfiguration can lead to users being unnecessarily restricted or resources being poorly allocated.
  • Potential Performance Overhead
    The additional layers of virtualization, resource monitoring, and file system isolation introduced by CloudLinux can impose a slight performance overhead on the server compared to running a bare, unmodified Linux distribution without these controls.
  • Dependency on CloudLinux Ecosystem
    Adopting CloudLinux means relying on their ecosystem for kernel updates, PHP patches, and security fixes. If the company experiences delays in releasing patches or changes its pricing/licensing model, hosting providers may find themselves locked into a dependency that is difficult to migrate away from.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

MASV
CloudLinux

Overall verdict

  • MASV is a solid choice for those who need to transfer large files efficiently and securely. Its ease of use, combined with robust performance, makes it a recommended tool for professionals in industries like media, entertainment, and any other field requiring the transfer of large datasets.

Why this product is good

  • MASV is considered a good option for transferring large files due to its high-speed transfer capabilities, no file size limits, and user-friendly interface. It is designed for professionals who need to send large amounts of data quickly and reliably. MASV also provides strong security measures and integrates well with other tools used in media production workflows.

Recommended for

    MASV is particularly recommended for video editors, content creators, filmmakers, and post-production teams who regularly exchange large volumes of data. It's also ideal for businesses that require fast and reliable file transfers without worrying about file size limitations.

Overall verdict

  • CloudLinux is a well-regarded, mature Linux OS distribution and toolset specifically designed for shared hosting and multi-tenant server environments, offering strong isolation, resource management, and security features that make it a solid choice for hosting providers.

Why this product is good

  • Provides LVE (Lightweight Virtual Environment) technology for per-tenant resource isolation, preventing 'bad neighbor' effects on shared servers
  • Enhances server stability and security by isolating users so that one account's issues (crashes, resource spikes) don't affect others
  • Offers extended lifecycle support (longer than standard CentOS/RHEL support windows), which is valuable for legacy systems
  • Includes tools like CloudLinux OS Shield, Imunify360 integration, and hardened kernel options for improved security
  • Compatible with popular control panels like cPanel and Plesk, making it easy to integrate into existing hosting stacks
  • Backed by an established company with a long track record in the hosting industry and responsive support
  • Offers granular control over CPU, memory, I/O, and other resources per user account
  • Provides PHP Selector and multiple PHP version support, useful for hosting providers serving diverse client needs

Recommended for

  • Web hosting companies running shared or reseller hosting environments
  • Hosting providers needing to isolate customer accounts on the same physical server
  • Businesses requiring extended OS support lifecycles beyond standard RHEL/CentOS EOL dates
  • Enterprises using cPanel or Plesk that want tighter security and resource control
  • Hosting companies looking to reduce support tickets caused by noisy-neighbor resource contention
  • IT teams managing multi-tenant infrastructure who need governance and monitoring tools built into the OS layer

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

MASV 1 video + Add
CloudLinux 3 videos + Add

Send Large Files with MASV

When To Use Cloudlinux On Your Virtual Private Server (VPS)

More videos

  • - CloudLinux OS+ in a minute: Explore Features
  • - How CloudLinux Plans to Keep CentOS 6 Alive

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
MASV
CloudLinux
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using MASV and CloudLinux. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

MASV no reviews yet
CloudLinux no reviews yet

We have no reviews of CloudLinux yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

MASV 27 mentions
CloudLinux 0 mentions
  • Why I Built An Open Source Alternative To WeTransfer
    I looked at what was already out there. MASV is hosted, so it has the same problem. Erugo self-hosts, but it feels like a super file sharing app that still didn't feel like a nice file sharing experience. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Very big file transfer service
    MASV - https://massive.io/ does up to 15TB per file and has a desktop app, but it's expensive. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Do you know of a good way to transfer files?
    Https://massive.io you pay by the GB downloaded. Worth it. But you both need fast internet. Source: over 3 years ago

View more

Tracking CloudLinux since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to MASV and CloudLinux

When comparing MASV and CloudLinux, you can also consider the following products.