
Marker.io
BugHerd
Usersnap
Userback
Bird Eats Bug
Pastel
Markup.io
Bugasura
ScienceDirect
Springer Link
Emerald Insight
ProQuest
Sage Journals
Loc.gov
IntechOpen
Asce Library
Collect website feedback from your team, clients, and users.
Get feedback with screenshots & technical metadata directly into your favorite project management tool.
Say goodbye to messy emails, spreadsheets and powerpoint. There is a better way!
Marker.io
ScienceDirectBased on our record, ScienceDirect should be more popular than Marker.io. It has been mentiond 20 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Marker.io is a feedback tool that allows users to attach product comments to a given UI component in an app. Itโs overlaid on the UAT environment, and allows users to export screenshots and logs alongside their review comments. User feedback comments can be automatically converted to tickets. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
This is a really nice note and solution of the problem. What is the difference from your competitor https://marker.io/? - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
I'm looking for a free and/or open source self-hosted alternative to marker.io for visual bug tracking/reporting. Source: over 3 years ago
Also keep an eye on this discussion to make issue forms available on private repos. Until this is possible, marker.io & Linear are a solution. Source: about 4 years ago
I work for a really small startup ( https://marker.io ) that focuses on drastically improving website feedback workflows for agencies/ clients. In some cases agencies say:. Source: over 4 years ago
You can research some more in those two sites (especially in sciencedirect.com, you can filter by open studies if you are broke like me). Source: about 3 years ago
That's incorrect. You also need to get some better sources. EPA.gov, the ICCT report, and sciencedirect.com are highly political institutions. Source: over 3 years ago
First of all, sciencedirect.com is not a peer reviewed science site. it gets a 2 out of 4 stars when rated by actual scientists. Source: over 3 years ago
The source "sciencedirect.com" is at the end of the quote and you can easily do your own research but you won't. Also the point is to show the hypocrisy that people accept random standards like that because you're programmed to. Source: almost 4 years ago
You might want to look at building a passive solar water heater. According to sciencedirect.com, "passive solar water heating systems generally transfer heat by natural circulation as a result of buoyancy due to temperature difference between two regimes; hence they do not require pumps to operate. They are the most commonly used solar water heating systems for domestic application." They are non-electric. Source: almost 4 years ago
BugHerd - BugHerd: The Website Feedback Tool for Agencies
Springer Link - Springer Link is a website offering access to millions of articles, research papers, books, and journals to researchers and students.
Usersnap - Usersnap is a customer feedback software for SaaS companies that need to constantly improve and grow their products.
Emerald Insight - Emerald Insight is a website that offers you thousands of books, articles, journals, and research papers on virtually all subjects from physical sciences such as physics and chemistry, to life sciences such as botany and zoology.
Userback - Userback empowers product teams to collect, understand, and act on user feedback with unprecedented speed and clarity.
ProQuest - ProQuest is a website that serves as an online educational hub where you can get eBooks, journals, research papers, articles, and even audios, videos, historical news, and magazines on any topic, subject, or fields such as physical sciences, health โฆ