Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

ManualTesting.dev VS Fillr.app

Compare ManualTesting.dev VS Fillr.app and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

ManualTesting.dev logo ManualTesting.dev

Manual Testing for Developers - Test Management Tool for developers and startups

Fillr.app logo Fillr.app

Form Filler & Test Data Manager: AutoFill With Data You Control
  • ManualTesting.dev Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-26
  • Fillr.app Capture Once, Fill Forever
    Capture Once, Fill Forever //
    2026-06-26
  • Fillr.app You Decide Every Field
    You Decide Every Field //
    2026-06-26
  • Fillr.app Fill From Your Own Data
    Fill From Your Own Data //
    2026-06-26
  • Fillr.app Speaks +60 Languages
    Speaks +60 Languages //
    2026-06-26
  • Fillr.app Fill Forms With One Click
    Fill Forms With One Click //
    2026-06-26

Fillr is a form filler and test data manager for Chrome โ€” for when it matters what goes into every field. Save any form as a preset with a rule per field, fill it from your own CSV or Excel rows, and manage all your test data in one place. Realistic generated data (110+ types, 60+ languages) is built in โ€” but you decide where it goes.

Anyone can spray random values into a page. Fillr is for when the data has to be right.

๏ฟฝ EVERY FIELD, YOUR RULES โœ“ Capture any form once and save it as a reusable preset โœ“ Set a rule per field: Generate, Fixed value, Blank, Skip, or Dataset column โœ“ Presets auto-match pages by URL pattern โ€” the right preset surfaces the moment you land on the page (with a picker when several match) โœ“ Preview the fill before you run it โœ“ Unlimited presets, free

๏ฟฝ FILL FORMS FROM YOUR OWN DATA (Pro) โœ“ Link a dataset to a preset, map columns to fields, and fill row by row โ€” sequential with a "row 3 of 20" readout, or random โœ“ Run 50 test cases through the same checkout without typing a single value โœ“ Your edge cases, your real records, your regression rows โ€” not random noise

๏ฟฝ๏ธ A REAL TEST DATA MANAGER โœ“ Import CSV, Excel or JSON โ€” or generate sheets of realistic dummy data โœ“ Edit rows in a spreadsheet grid, organize with tags โœ“ Export any dataset to CSV, Excel or JSON

โšก INSTANT FILL, WHEN YOU JUST NEED VALUES One click auto-fills every field with realistic fake data โ€” names, emails, addresses, phones, dates and more. Zero setup, works on any site, one-click Clear when you're done.

๏ฟฝ 60+ LANGUAGES (Pro โ€” English is free) Generate locale-accurate names, addresses and phone numbers in French, German, Japanese, Arabic and dozens more for international testing.

๏ฟฝ๏ธ POINT-AND-CLICK, 100% NO-CODE A side panel plus a draggable floating bar on the page. Fill, clear, capture, switch presets โ€” no scripts, no selectors, no JSON to edit.

Fillr.app

Website
fillr.app
$ Details
freemium $9.99 / Monthly
Platforms
Web (Dashboard) Chrome
Release Date
2026 June

ManualTesting.dev features and specs

  • Focused on Manual Testing
    ManualTesting.dev is specifically dedicated to manual testing, providing a niche resource for QA professionals who need to strengthen their manual testing skills rather than being overwhelmed by automation-focused content.
  • Beginner-Friendly
    The platform appears designed to be accessible for those new to software testing, offering foundational knowledge and guidance that helps newcomers enter the QA field without requiring prior technical expertise.
  • Structured Learning Path
    The site offers organized content that guides learners through manual testing concepts in a logical progression, making it easier to build knowledge incrementally rather than jumping between disconnected topics.
  • Practical and Job-Oriented
    The platform focuses on practical, real-world manual testing skills that are directly applicable to job roles, helping testers prepare for actual work scenarios and interviews in QA positions.
  • Free or Affordable Access
    ManualTesting.dev provides accessible content without significant financial barriers, making it a cost-effective option for individuals looking to learn manual testing without investing in expensive courses or certifications.

Possible disadvantages of ManualTesting.dev

  • Limited Scope
    By focusing exclusively on manual testing, the platform may not adequately prepare testers for the modern QA landscape where automation skills are increasingly expected and valued by employers.
  • Relatively Unknown Platform
    ManualTesting.dev is not as well-established or widely recognized as major learning platforms like Udemy, Coursera, or ISTQB resources, which may limit community support and peer interaction.
  • Limited Advanced Content
    The platform may lack depth for experienced QA professionals looking for advanced testing methodologies, complex test strategy development, or specialized domain testing knowledge.
  • Smaller Community
    Compared to larger testing communities like Ministry of Testing or Software Testing Help, the platform likely has a smaller user base, resulting in fewer discussion opportunities, peer reviews, and networking possibilities.
  • Content Freshness Concerns
    As a smaller, niche website, there may be concerns about how frequently the content is updated to reflect current industry trends, tools, and best practices in manual testing.

Fillr.app features and specs

  • Presets
    Capture any web form as a reusable preset โ€” refill in one click
  • Filling Rules
    Per-field fill rules: generated data, fixed value, your own data, or skip
  • Datasets
    Datasets module: build, generate, or import rows of test data
  • Your Data
    Fill forms with your own imported data, not just fake values
  • Bulk Data Generation
    Use presets schema to generate bulk of data
  • 60+ locales
    60+ locales for realistic, region-specific test data

Analysis of ManualTesting.dev

Overall verdict

  • ManualTesting.dev appears to be a niche resource site focused on manual testing concepts, tutorials, and interview preparation for QA professionals. It's a solid, budget-friendly (often free) option for learners wanting to build foundational manual testing skills, though it may lack the depth, interactivity, or certification value of paid, structured courses.

Why this product is good

  • Provides free or low-cost access to manual testing concepts and materials, making it accessible for beginners
  • Focuses specifically on manual testing, offering targeted content rather than generic QA overviews
  • Often includes practical examples, sample test cases, and interview questions useful for job seekers
  • Simple, straightforward format that's easy to digest without needing extensive technical setup
  • Useful as a supplementary study resource alongside other QA learning platforms

Recommended for

  • Beginners entering the QA/software testing field looking for foundational knowledge
  • Job seekers preparing for manual testing interview questions
  • Students or self-learners who want free supplementary material on testing concepts
  • QA professionals needing a quick refresher on manual testing fundamentals
  • Those on a tight budget who can't afford premium testing courses or bootcamps

Analysis of Fillr.app

Overall verdict

  • Fillr.app appears to be a form-filling automation tool designed to save time by auto-completing online forms, applications, and repetitive data entry tasks. Based on available information, it offers a convenient solution for reducing manual typing, though users should verify current features, pricing, and security practices directly on their site before committing.

Why this product is good

  • Automates repetitive form-filling tasks to save time
  • Reduces manual data entry errors
  • Likely offers browser extension or integration for ease of use
  • Can store commonly used information for quick access across multiple sites

Recommended for

  • Job seekers filling out multiple online applications
  • Professionals who frequently complete online forms
  • Small business owners handling repetitive data entry
  • Users looking to streamline online registration and checkout processes

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ManualTesting.dev and Fillr.app)
Software Development
100 100%
0% 0
Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Test Management
100 100%
0% 0
Web Forms
0 0%
100% 100

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing ManualTesting.dev and Fillr.app.

What makes your product unique?

Fillr.app's answer:

It leads with control, not random fill. Capture any web form as a reusable preset, set per-field rules (generated, fixed, your own data, or skip), and refill in one click โ€” plus a built-in Datasets module to build, generate, and export test data. A form-filler and test-data manager in one, no code.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Fillr.app's answer:

Fake Filler only sprays random data; Mockaroo generates data but can't fill forms. Fillr does both โ€” and lets you fill with your own data, with reusable presets, per-field control, and 60+ locales. No scripts.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Fillr.app's answer:

QA engineers and developers who repeatedly test web forms and need realistic, controllable test data. Demo and sales engineers are a natural secondary audience.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Fillr.app's answer:

Next.js 15, React 19, and TypeScript dashboard; a Manifest V3 Chrome extension built with Vite and supabase for backend

User comments

Share your experience with using ManualTesting.dev and Fillr.app. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ManualTesting.dev seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ManualTesting.dev mentions (1)

  • How I improved my confidence, code quality and became a better developer
    We built ManualTesting.dev, a simple and powerful tool, to help my team and people like me write code, test it, and deliver on time with confidence. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

Fillr.app mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Fillr.app yet. Tracking of Fillr.app recommendations started around Jun 2026.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ManualTesting.dev and Fillr.app, you can also consider the following products