Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus VS Surfer

Compare ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus VS Surfer and see what are their differences

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus

Patch Manager Plus, an all-round patching solution, offers automated patch deployment for Windows, macOS, and Linux endpoints, plus patching support for 350+ third-party applications You can use it to patch computers within LAN and WAN.

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid Free trial $245 / Annually (50 computers and single user license)
Is it good? Alternatives
Surfer

Surf News, Fantasy Surfer, Photos, Video and Forecasting.

Surfer Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Is it good? Alternatives
SysAid
SysAid is an AI-first Help Desk & ITSM platform powered by Agentic AI sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Surfer seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 1
Patch Management popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
100 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Surfer
Website manageengine.com github.com
Pricing
Paid Free trial $245 / Annually (50 computers and single user license) Official pricing
—
Platforms
Android iOS Cross Platform Windows Mac OSX Linux +3
—
Listed in
Patch Management IT Asset Management Cyber Security Network Security Third-party Patch Management +2
Monitoring Tools Simulation Software SEO Tools SEO +1

About ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and Surfer

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Surfer

Patch Manager Plus is an all round solution for your enterprise that enables you to manage and distribute patches to endpoints across the IT network. These endpoints consist of laptops, servers and workstations. Regularly updating applications across these systems, heightens the over all security...

Read more about ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus

No description of Surfer yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus 6 features
Surfer 5 features
  • Automate patch management
  • Cross-platform support
  • Third party applications patching
  • Flexible deployment policies
  • Test & approve patches
  • Windows 10 feature update deployment
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Surfer provides a clean and intuitive web interface which makes it easy for users to upload, manage, and share files effortlessly.
  • Self-Hosted
    Being a self-hosted solution, Surfer gives users full control over their data, ensuring that sensitive information is kept private and secure.
  • Open Source
    Surfer is open source, allowing users to review, modify, and contribute to the codebase, thereby fostering community collaboration and transparency.
  • Integrated Authentication
    Surfer supports Cloudron’s authentication system, providing seamless user management and secure access to the application.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    The application is built to work smoothly across various platforms and devices, enhancing accessibility and usability.

Possible disadvantages

  • Dependency on Cloudron
    Surfer’s integration with Cloudron can be a limitation for users who do not utilize Cloudron, potentially adding an extra layer of dependency.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to some commercial file-sharing and management tools, Surfer may lack certain advanced features and customizations.
  • Resource Requirement
    As a self-hosted solution, running Surfer requires server resources, making it less ideal for users with limited server capacity or technical expertise.
  • Initial Setup and Maintenance
    Setting up and maintaining Surfer might require a basic understanding of server management and Linux commands, posing a challenge for novice users.
  • Scalability Concerns
    While suitable for small to medium setups, Surfer might face scalability issues when handling a large number of users and files.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Surfer

Overall verdict

  • ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is a robust and effective solution for organizations seeking to improve their patch management processes. Its comprehensive feature set, combined with ease of use and reliable performance, makes it a strong choice for businesses of all sizes.

Why this product is good

  • ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is well-regarded for its user-friendly interface, extensive patch management capabilities, and automation features. It supports a wide range of operating systems and third-party applications, making it a versatile solution for various IT environments. Users appreciate its ability to streamline the patching process, reduce vulnerabilities, and ensure compliance with security standards.

Recommended for

    This solution is recommended for IT administrators and organizations that require a reliable way to manage the patching of multiple systems and applications, especially those with diverse IT environments or limited resources to dedicate to manual patch management. It’s particularly suitable for medium to large enterprises looking to enhance their security posture and compliance efforts.

Overall verdict

  • Surfer is considered a good tool for those looking for a minimalistic and efficient way to serve static files. Its open-source nature allows for customization and contributions from the community, which can be a significant advantage for users needing specific features or improvements.

Why this product is good

  • Surfer is a self-hosted static file server that is commonly praised for its simplicity, ease of use, and lightweight nature. It allows users to easily deploy and serve static files effortlessly. Additionally, its support for directory listings and file metadata adds to its functionality, making it a convenient tool for developers who need a straightforward solution for serving static files.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking for a simple and efficient static file server.
  • Teams needing a lightweight self-hosted solution for serving static assets.
  • Individuals or organizations prioritizing open-source tools that can be customized or enhanced as needed.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus 1 video + Add
Surfer 3 videos + Add

Patch management free training

Pro Surfer Reviews Surf Movies, from 'Blue Crush' to 'Point Break' | Vanity Fair

More videos

  • Tutorial - Surfer SEO Review 2020 [🚨FULL Tutorial & 👉 How to SkyRocket Your Rankings❗️]
  • Review - Surfer Girl Haircare Routine

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
Surfer
100% 100%
Patch Management
0% 0%
19% 19%
Monitoring Tools
81% 81%
0% 0%
Simulation Software
100% 100%
100% 100%
OS & Utilities
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and Surfer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus 0 mentions
Surfer 1 mention

Tracking ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus since Mar 2021.

  • How to host a static website on Kubernetes with Nginx Ingress?
    I used Surfer for a little while to do static file hosting on Digital Ocean K8s. Set the backend file hosting up on spaces, with nginx as the ingress. Source: almost 4 years ago

Alternatives to ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and Surfer

When comparing ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and Surfer, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...