
SolarWinds Patch Manager
WSUS Offline Update
Microsoft Update Catalog
ManageEngine Endpoint Central
AutoPatcher
WHDownloader
Batchpatch
Patch Manager Plus, an all-round patching solution, offers automated patch deployment for Windows, macOS, and Linux endpoints, plus patching support for 350+ third-party applications You can use it to patch computers within LAN and WAN.

Cerbos
authzed
Aserto
Warrant
Ory
Permit.io
Topaz.sh
A batteries-included system for authorization.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Oso seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 7 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | manageengine.com | osohq.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


Patch Manager Plus is an all round solution for your enterprise that enables you to manage and distribute patches to endpoints across the IT network. These endpoints consist of laptops, servers and workstations. Regularly updating applications across these systems, heightens the over all security...
Drop Oso Cloud into your apps to quickly add roles, sharing, fine-grained access, or any other access model you can think of.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
This solution is recommended for IT administrators and organizations that require a reliable way to manage the patching of multiple systems and applications, especially those with diverse IT environments or limited resources to dedicate to manual patch management. It’s particularly suitable for medium to large enterprises looking to enhance their security posture and compliance efforts.
No analysis of Oso yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and Oso. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus since Mar 2021.
When the third case starts popping up, that's when an authorization provider like Oso or Permit.io starts to sound appealing. Centralized, easily readable authorization logic combined with easy queries for "what users are allowed to... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
I know of warrant.dev, osohq.com, and Ory Keto but I don't see that these evaluate based on attributes. Source: over 3 years ago
Oso supports applying authorization logic at the ORM layer so that you can efficiently authorize entire data sets. For example, suppose you have millions of posts in a social media application created by thousands of users, and regular... Source: about 5 years ago
When comparing ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and Oso, you can also consider the following products.

SolarWinds Patch Manager is an intuitive patch management software for quickly addressing software vulnerabilities.
Compare SolarWinds Patch Manager to ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus or Oso:

Cerbos helps teams separate their authorization process from their core application code, making their authorization system more scalable, more secure and easier to change as the application evolves.
Compare Cerbos to ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus or Oso:

Using "WSUS Offline Update" (formerly known as "ct offline update" or "DIY...
Compare WSUS Offline Update to ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus or Oso:

The platform to store, compute, and validate app permissions
Compare authzed to ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus or Oso:

Official Microsoft Update Catalog download site.
Compare Microsoft Update Catalog to ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus or Oso:

Fine-grained, scalable authorization in minutes
Compare Aserto to ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus or Oso: