Software Alternatives & Startups

MakeWPFast VS git-sizer

Compare MakeWPFast VS git-sizer and see what are their differences

MakeWPFast

MakeWPFast is a WordPress performance lab. We benchmark 35,000+ plugins and 200+ themes for their real backend impact - autoload bloat, slow database queries, PHP memory - and publish the measured data others ignore.

Rating
0 reviews
git-sizer

Compute various size metrics for a Git repository, flagging those that might cause problems - github/git-sizer

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, MakeWPFast should be more popular than git-sizer. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
2 vs 1
WordPress popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

MakeWPFast
git-sizer
Website makewpfast.com github.com
Platforms
Wordpress
—
Company Startup from Poland · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 —
Listed in

About MakeWPFast and git-sizer

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

MakeWPFast
git-sizer

MakeWPFast is a WordPress performance lab focused on the backend bottlenecks that caching plugins and CDNs can't fix. While 90% of WordPress speed advice is about the frontend — compressing images, minifying CSS, adding cache layers — the real slowdown usually lives deeper: bloated wp_options...

Read more about MakeWPFast

No description of git-sizer yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

MakeWPFast 4 features
git-sizer 5 features
  • 35,000+ Plugin Benchmarks
    Every plugin is installed in a controlled environment and measured for its real impact on database queries, wp_options autoload size, and page load time — then given a speed score.
  • Plugin & Theme Comparisons
    580+ head-to-head comparisons and 200+ themes tested, so you can pick the faster option before installing it.
  • Error Guides & Research
    19 diagnostic guides plus an in-depth blog covering database optimization, slow-query diagnostics, and server configuration.
  • Data-Driven, Not Opinion
    Every entry is backed by reproducible benchmark data — before/after deltas, not generic "install a caching plugin" advice.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    High-quality optimization services can be relatively expensive, potentially limiting access for individuals or small businesses with limited budgets.
  • Dependent on Service
    Relying on an external service can create dependency, which could be problematic if the service is discontinued or if there are communication issues.
  • Learning Curve
    Users may need to invest time to understand the recommendations and implementations suggested by MakeWPFast to maintain optimized performance over time.
  • Specific Scope
    While MakeWPFast focuses on speed optimization, it may not address other broader website maintenance or development needs that a site owner might have.
  • Comprehensive Repository Analysis
    git-sizer analyzes many different dimensions of a Git repository including commit count, tree size, blob size, history depth, and reference counts, providing a holistic view of repository health and potential scaling issues.
  • Easy to Use
    The tool is simple to run with minimal setup—just execute it within a git repository—and it produces clear, human-readable output that highlights potential problem areas without requiring complex configuration.
  • Identifies Performance Bottlenecks
    It helps identify specific issues that could degrade Git performance, such as excessively large blobs, deep history, large trees, or too many references, which is valuable before migrating or scaling repositories.
  • Open Source and Maintained by GitHub
    Being an official GitHub project, it benefits from credibility, community trust, and ongoing maintenance, and it is well documented with clear explanations of what each metric means.
  • Useful for Pre-Migration Checks
    It's particularly helpful for teams migrating repositories to new platforms or consolidating repos, as it flags potential issues that could cause problems during migration or with hosting providers' limits.

Possible disadvantages

  • No Automatic Remediation
    git-sizer only identifies and reports issues but does not offer any built-in tools or automated processes to fix problems like large blobs or excessive history depth—users must use separate tools like BFG Repo-Cleaner or git-filter-repo.
  • Output Can Be Overwhelming for Beginners
    While detailed, the output includes many metrics and threshold levels that may be confusing for users unfamiliar with Git internals, requiring some learning curve to fully interpret results.
  • Limited to Local Analysis
    The tool analyzes a local clone of the repository, so it requires users to have a full local copy of the repo (or at least enough history) to get accurate results, which can be time-consuming for very large repositories.
  • No Real-Time Monitoring
    It functions as a one-time analysis tool rather than providing continuous or real-time monitoring of repository health, requiring manual reruns to track changes over time.
  • Command-Line Only Interface
    The tool lacks a graphical user interface, which may be less accessible for users who prefer visual dashboards or are less comfortable with command-line tools.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

MakeWPFast
git-sizer

Overall verdict

  • MakeWPFast appears to be a WordPress performance optimization service that can help speed up slow websites, though you should verify current reviews and offerings directly before committing.

Why this product is good

  • Focuses specifically on WordPress speed optimization, which is a common pain point for site owners
  • Faster load times can improve user experience, SEO rankings, and conversion rates
  • Specialized services often address technical issues like caching, image optimization, and database cleanup that general hosts may not
  • Can save time for non-technical users who don't want to handle performance tuning themselves

Recommended for

  • WordPress site owners struggling with slow page load times
  • Bloggers and small businesses wanting better SEO and user experience
  • E-commerce stores where speed directly impacts sales and conversions
  • Non-technical users who prefer outsourcing performance optimization to specialists

Overall verdict

  • git-sizer is a solid, focused open-source tool that effectively analyzes Git repositories to identify size and structural issues that could cause performance problems or hosting limits, making it a valuable diagnostic utility for repository maintenance.

Why this product is good

  • Quickly identifies large blobs, deep histories, and other repository bloat issues that impact performance
  • Simple command-line tool with no complex setup or dependencies required
  • Provides clear, actionable metrics about repository size and structure
  • Backed by GitHub, ensuring credibility and ongoing relevance to Git ecosystem needs
  • Helps proactively catch issues before they cause problems with hosting platforms or clone/fetch performance
  • Open source and actively maintained with community input

Recommended for

  • Repository administrators managing large or growing codebases
  • Teams migrating repositories to new hosting platforms with size limits
  • Developers troubleshooting slow clone, fetch, or checkout operations
  • DevOps engineers auditing repository health before major infrastructure changes
  • Organizations enforcing repository size policies or best practices
  • Anyone dealing with repositories that have accumulated large binary files or excessive history over time

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
MakeWPFast
git-sizer
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using MakeWPFast and git-sizer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

MakeWPFast 2 mentions
git-sizer 1 mention
  • Which of Your Plugins Is the Heaviest? Now You Can See It on the Plugins Page.
    The data comes from makewpfast.com, where we benchmark plugins in isolated Docker containers. No caching, no interference from other plugins, just a clean WordPress install with one plugin active at a time. We measure memory and queries,... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • I Benchmarked 4,999 WordPress Plugins for Speed. Here Are the Results.
    The full database is free to search at makewpfast.com. No signup, no paywall. Look up any of the 4,999 tested plugins before you install them. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • how to keep github repos small?
    Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago

Alternatives to MakeWPFast and git-sizer

When comparing MakeWPFast and git-sizer, you can also consider the following products.