Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

MakeSpace VS Concourse

Compare MakeSpace VS Concourse and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

MakeSpace logo MakeSpace

New take on storage units. $25/month. NYC for now.

Concourse logo Concourse

Pipeline-based CI system written in Go
  • MakeSpace Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-07
  • Concourse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-31

MakeSpace features and specs

  • Convenience
    MakeSpace offers a convenient storage solution by picking up, storing, and delivering your items on demand, eliminating the need for you to transport items to a storage facility yourself.
  • Inventory Management
    The service provides an online photo inventory of stored items, allowing customers to keep track of what they have in storage without needing to visit the storage unit physically.
  • Flexible Plans
    MakeSpace offers various pricing plans and storage sizes to fit different needs, which can be more cost-effective and flexible compared to traditional storage options.
  • Secure Storage
    The company ensures that items are stored in a climate-controlled and secure facility, which adds a level of safety and protection compared to self-storage units.

Possible disadvantages of MakeSpace

  • Limited Service Areas
    MakeSpace is not available everywhere, limiting their convenience to customers who live outside of their service regions.
  • Higher Costs
    While offering convenience, MakeSpace can be more expensive compared to traditional self-storage services, especially if you require frequent pickups or deliveries.
  • Access Limitations
    Since MakeSpace requires you to schedule deliveries to access your items, it lacks the immediate access flexibility that traditional self-storage provides.
  • Service Delays
    There can be potential delays in scheduling pickups and deliveries, which might be problematic if you need to access your stored items quickly.

Concourse features and specs

  • Simplicity and Consistency
    Concourse CI offers a simple and consistent UI/UX across different platforms. The interface is intuitive and designed to make it easy for users to visualize complex pipelines.
  • Containerized Builds
    Everything Concourse runs is within containers, ensuring isolated and reproducible builds. This method reduces the chances of environment-related issues during the deployment process.
  • Pipeline as Code
    Concourse utilizes a declarative approach to define pipelines using YAML files, which makes versioning and changing pipelines straightforward and trackable.
  • Scalability
    Concourse is highly scalable and can work well with very large pipelines and numerous concurrent builds, especially fitting for microservices architectures.
  • Dynamic Workflows
    It supports dynamic workflows through its resource/event-driven nature, allowing pipelines to react automatically to changes in resources.

Possible disadvantages of Concourse

  • Steeper Learning Curve
    New users might find Concourse's approach to pipeline as code and its unique abstractions more challenging to grasp initially compared to other CI/CD tools.
  • Limited Plugin Ecosystem
    Compared to other CI/CD platforms, Concourse has a more limited plugin ecosystem, which may require building custom resources for specific tasks that are readily available in other solutions.
  • Resource Intensity
    Due to its containerization strategy, Concourse can be resource-intensive, particularly if not appropriately managed or scaled.
  • Less Community Support
    Although active, the community around Concourse CI is smaller than those for more established CI/CD tools like Jenkins, which can result in fewer community-contributed plugins and resources.
  • Complex Configuration
    While powerful, the configuration files can become complex and hard to manage for large-scale deployments, requiring significant maintenance effort.

MakeSpace videos

MakeSpace takes and stores your belongings

More videos:

  • Review - Will MakeSpace Be The Amazon Of Physical Storage?

Concourse videos

Concourse Smart Wheels - Review

More videos:

  • Review - Australian Golf Digest TV - Concourse CBM3 Golf Buggy
  • Review - THE GOLF SHOW CONCOURSE CBM3

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MakeSpace and Concourse)
Storage
100 100%
0% 0
Continuous Integration
0 0%
100% 100
Moving
100 100%
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using MakeSpace and Concourse. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Concourse seems to be a lot more popular than MakeSpace. While we know about 23 links to Concourse, we've tracked only 1 mention of MakeSpace. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

MakeSpace mentions (1)

  • March 28 - 31 Discussion Thread
    Two storage companies I see a lot are Clutter and Makespace and they come to you and deliver back to you!! PACK THAT SHIT UP! Source: over 5 years ago

Concourse mentions (23)

  • GitHub Actions Has a Package Manager, and It Might Be the Worst
    Open source: - https://concourse-ci.org/ (discussed in the context of Radicle here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44658820 ) - Jenkins -etc. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Tracking Supermarket Prices with Playwright
    > My CI of choice is [Concourse](https://concourse-ci.org/) which describes itself as "a continuous thing-doer". While it has a bit of a learning curve, I appreciate its declarative model for the pipelines and how it versions every single input to ensure reproducible builds as much as it can. What's the thought process behind using a CI server - which I thought is mainly for builds - for what essentially is a data... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • We built the fastest CI in the world. It failed
    > Imagine you live in a world where no part of the build has to repeat unless the changes actually impacted it. A world in which all builds happened with automatic parallelism. A world in which you could reproduce very reliably any part of the build on your laptop. That sounds similar to https://concourse-ci.org/ I quite like it, but it never seemed to gain traction outside of Cloud Foundry. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • Ask HN: What do you use to run background jobs?
    I used Concourse[0] for a while. No real complaints, the visibility is nice but the functionality isn't anything new. [0] https://concourse-ci.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • How to host React/Next "Cheaply" with a global audience? (NGO needs help)
    We run https://concourse-ci.org/ on our own hardware at our office. (as a side note, running your own hardware, you realise just how abysmally slow most cloud servers are.). Source: about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MakeSpace and Concourse, you can also consider the following products

Boxie24 - Low-Cost and Convenient Moving & Storage Solution!

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Callbox Storage - Callbox Storage takes the hassle out of self-storage with full service storage. We'll pick up, organize, pack, store, and bring it back when you want it!

Travis CI - Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CIโ€™s precision syntaxโ€”all with the developer in mind.

Clutter - Stores what wonโ€™t fit in your closet

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.