
Apollo.io
ZoomInfo
Hunter.io
Clearbit
UpLead
RocketReach
Lead411
Search less. Sell more.

twitterapi.io
SocialData Tools
TweetAPI
Sorsa API
Twexapi
TwitterAPIs
XFlux
GetXAPI is the cheapest Twitter API and X API. $0.001 per call returns ~20 tweets ($0.05 per 1,000). Fetch tweets, profiles, followers. Cheapest Twitter & X API alternative.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Lusha seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | lusha.com | getxapi.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | Startup from the United States · 100 - 249 employees · 2016 | Startup from the United Arab Emirates · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


Lusha is a continuously updating database that provides B2B Salespeople with targeted, accurate, and timely business information. Lusha aggregates its data from multiple sources, cross-checking and updating LIVE to ensure up-to-the-minute data accuracy and database cleanliness.
GetXAPI is the cheapest Twitter API (X API) for developers and AI agents: pay-per-call data with no subscription and no X developer account. Most endpoints are $0.001 per call (about $0.05 per 1,000 tweets); DMs are $0.002. New accounts get $0.10 in free credits, no card. Read: search, profiles,...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
How to use Lusha
More videos
No GetXAPI videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Lusha and GetXAPI.
GetXAPI's answer:
Developers and AI-agent builders who need affordable, reliable Twitter/X data without the cost or setup of the official API. Typical users are indie developers and founders, automation builders (n8n, MCP, Cursor), growth and social-monitoring teams, and researchers collecting tweet datasets.
GetXAPI's answer:
GetXAPI is the cheapest way to read and write Twitter/X data programmatically. Most endpoints cost $0.001 per call (about $0.05 per 1,000 tweets) on a pure pay-per-call model, with no subscription, no developer-account approval, and no platform-level rate limits. You sign up with email, copy a Bearer token, and start calling 50+ endpoints right away.
GetXAPI's answer:
It is roughly 3x cheaper than twitterapi.io and far cheaper than the official X API for reads, with no monthly minimum, so you only pay for what you use. Unlike the official API there is no developer-account approval and no 15-minute rate-limit windows to engineer around. It also ships ready-made integrations: a public OpenAPI 3.1 spec, an MCP server for Claude and Cursor, and Apify actors.
GetXAPI's answer:
GetXAPI started after its founder kept overpaying for Twitter/X data through the official API, Apify, and RapidAPI. After spending weeks understanding how those tools work, he built a leaner pay-per-call API that delivers the same reads and writes at a fraction of the cost, with no subscription or developer account. It launched publicly in early 2026 and grew through the developer community.
GetXAPI's answer:
GetXAPI is a REST API built on Node.js and TypeScript, returning JSON with Bearer-token authentication and a public OpenAPI 3.1 specification. For integration it provides an MCP server (Claude, Cursor, Continue), Apify actors, a Postman collection, and interactive Fern docs.
GetXAPI's answer:
Share your experience with using Lusha and GetXAPI. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


The two overlap heavily: data plus email sequences at a self-serve price. Apollo’s Basic plan includes 30,000 credits a year against 4,800 on Lusha Starter, so Apollo wins on volume, and Lusha wins on simplicity for a...
What is the difference between a prospecting tool and a sales engagement tool? Prospecting tools find and verify contact information. Sales engagement tools run outreach sequences and manage replies. Some platforms,...
Lusha made a name with their Chrome extension — hover over a LinkedIn profile and get the phone number. It's simple and it works. Their data quality for US direct dials is solid. The free tier is slim (5...
There is no single threshold across all packages. TweetAPI PAYG costs $0.50 per 1,000 normal units; GetXAPI's undiscounted standard calls cost $1 per 1,000. But GetXAPI Pro includes 30,000 base standard calls for $15,...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Most SDR stacks start with a contact database — ZoomInfo, Apollo, or Lusha — and treat enrichment as a one-time step at the top of the funnel. The problem: these databases are 3–18 months stale on average. Job titles change. Companies... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
Tracking GetXAPI since Jun 2026.
When comparing Lusha and GetXAPI, you can also consider the following products.

Apollo’s predictive prospecting, sales engagement, and actionable analytics help the teams to reach its full revenue potential.
Compare Apollo.io to Lusha or GetXAPI:

Reliable Twitter API Alternative | Access Twitter data at scale without limits. Our enterprise-grade API offers unlimited data access, better pricing, and higher rate limits than Twitter's official API. Perfect for businesses needing mass data.
Compare twitterapi.io to Lusha or GetXAPI:

ZoomInfo is a B2B database providing detailed business information on people and companies.
Compare ZoomInfo to Lusha or GetXAPI:

Twitter/X data API without the enterprise price
Compare SocialData Tools to Lusha or GetXAPI:


Twitter data API for developers and researchers: 82 endpoints, pay as you go from $5, SDKs, MCP, 100 free requests.
Compare TweetAPI to Lusha or GetXAPI: