Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

LT Browser by Lambdatest VS Captain Stack

Compare LT Browser by Lambdatest VS Captain Stack and see what are their differences

LT Browser by Lambdatest logo LT Browser by Lambdatest

LT Browser is a free dev friendly browser for developers and testers. You can see mobile view of website on different screen sizes and resolution on 50+ pre installed view ports. You can build, test and debug your website faster then ever.

Captain Stack logo Captain Stack

An open source alternative to GitHub Copilot
  • LT Browser by Lambdatest Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-11

With LT Browser, you can see mobile view of website on different screen sizes and resolution. With over 50+ devices to choose from, mobile website test hasn't been much easier. Use LT Browser and ensure that your website is mobile responsive. You can create your own custom devices and save it for future uses. Create new mobile, tablet or desktop devices and test website on various devices, screen resolution and perform screen resolution test for website on different screen sizes. You donโ€™t have to switch between two devices to perform mobile website test. Test on two devices simultaneously with LT Browser and perform mobile website test on different tablet and desktop devices and inspect website on different resolution and resolution simultaneously. LT Browser comes with Dev Tool to debug multiple devices while performing responsiveness test on your devices simultaneously. Test website on various devices simultaneously with separate Dev Tools for each device.

  • Captain Stack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03

Captain Stack

Website
github.com
Pricing URL
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

LT Browser by Lambdatest features and specs

  • Responsive Testing
    LT Browser allows users to test their websites on a variety of screen sizes and resolutions, ensuring that the site is responsive and performs well on all devices.
  • Pre-built Device Viewports
    The tool comes with a wide range of pre-built device viewports which can simulate different devices' screens, making it easier to perform cross-device testing.
  • Local Testing
    Users can perform local testing, allowing them to test and debug their websites in the development phase without having to deploy them.
  • Network Throttling
    LT Browser includes network throttling features that enable users to test their websites under different network conditions, such as 3G, 4G, and slower connections.
  • Collaborative Features
    The tool provides features for easy bug logging and sharing of test results with team members, fostering better collaboration.
  • Performance Reports
    Users receive detailed performance reports that help identify and rectify issues affecting the website's performance across different devices.
  • Integration with Popular Tools
    LT Browser integrates with a range of popular development tools such as Slack, JIRA, and Asana, streamlining workflows and improving productivity.

Possible disadvantages of LT Browser by Lambdatest

  • Subscription Cost
    LT Browser requires a subscription, which might be a consideration for small teams or individual developers who have budget constraints.
  • Learning Curve
    Though user-friendly, new users may face a slight learning curve in navigating and leveraging all the features effectively.
  • Limited Free Features
    The free version has limited features, potentially requiring users to upgrade to paid plans to access advanced functionalities.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running multiple devices and resolution tests simultaneously can be resource-intensive, possibly affecting the performance of less powerful systems.
  • No Offline Mode
    An active internet connection is required to use many of the features, meaning you cannot perform tests offline.

Captain Stack features and specs

  • Open Source
    Captain Stack is an open-source project, which allows developers to contribute to its development and customize the tool for their specific needs without any licensing restrictions.
  • Cost-effective
    Being a GitHub-based project, it is typically free to use, making it an accessible option for developers and organizations who want to experiment with AI-driven coding without incurring additional costs.
  • Customizability
    Users can modify and extend the tool's capabilities as needed, potentially tailoring it to specific programming languages or frameworks beyond its original scope.
  • Community-driven
    The open-source nature encourages a community of developers to provide enhancements, fixes, and support, potentially leading to faster iterations and feature implementations.

Possible disadvantages of Captain Stack

  • Potential Lack of Support
    As an open-source project, it might not have the same level of professional support and documentation that a commercial product would offer.
  • Stability and Maintenance
    The project might suffer from irregular updates or maintenance depending on community involvement, which can lead to stability and reliability concerns.
  • Limited Features Compared to Commercial Solutions
    While functional, it may not offer the breadth of features and integrations that a commercial tool like GitHub Copilot provides.
  • Dependency on Community Contributions
    The project's progress and enhancement rely heavily on community contributions, which can be unpredictable and vary over time.

Analysis of LT Browser by Lambdatest

Overall verdict

  • LT Browser is considered a good tool for developers and QA testers looking for an efficient way to validate the responsiveness of web applications. It integrates well with other testing tools and platforms, offers a range of customizable viewport options, and supports local testing. Users appreciate its user-friendly design and the ability to sync with the development workflow seamlessly.

Why this product is good

  • LT Browser by LambdaTest is designed for developers and testers who need to ensure their websites are mobile responsive. It offers a straightforward interface that allows users to test the appearance and functionality of web pages across different devices and viewports. The tool supports a wide range of device resolutions and allows side-by-side comparisons, which can be crucial for identifying and resolving responsive design issues quickly.

Recommended for

    LT Browser is recommended for web developers, QA testers, and UI/UX designers who regularly work on responsive web designs. It's particularly useful for those managing projects where cross-device consistency is crucial. Additionally, it's beneficial for agile teams that require fast feedback loops and efficient collaboration.

LT Browser by Lambdatest videos

No LT Browser by Lambdatest videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Captain Stack videos

How to install Captain Stack

More videos:

  • Review - Captain Stack - a Github Copilot clone

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to LT Browser by Lambdatest and Captain Stack)
Website Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
58 58%
42% 42
Browser Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Coding
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using LT Browser by Lambdatest and Captain Stack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare LT Browser by Lambdatest and Captain Stack

LT Browser by Lambdatest Reviews

  1. Alick
    ยท Team Lead at Partnerize ยท
    Our go to mobile testing tool

    LT Browser is the new defacto tool for responsive testing requirements. Being a ecommerce company with wide audience we need to stay on our toes to keep our users bouncing because of a UI bug. LT browser has been helping us for the past 3 months with testing on the latest mobile view ports. And my favorite feature is instant local testing by simply adding the URL and side by side comparison of two devices. And best part of the debugging is that we can see the changes being reflected in real time

    ๐Ÿ Competitors: BrowserStack, CrossBrowserTesting
    ๐Ÿ‘ Pros:    Latest devices resolution|Scroll sync with two devices|Intuitive interface|Integration with jira|Instant screenshot and bug reporting flow|Testing on various networks
    ๐Ÿ‘Ž Cons:    Cross browser testing is not possible|Missing the test analytics
  2. chris-hewins
    ยท QA Engineer at Toast Inc ยท
    Helped us develop mobile websites faster

    As website designers our team loves the way we can show all the progress to our clients. It helped us have a better transparency in our work. We can just screengrab the viewport and easily share it with clients. And the best part is the interface, it's intuitive enough that none of us have ever looked at the support doc. Ability to test the local url path and Integration with JIRA saves a lot of time and makes it easier to communicate within the team. Kudos Team LT Browser..!!

    ๐Ÿ Competitors: Blisk Browser
    ๐Ÿ‘ Pros:    45+ viewports to choose from|Intuitive ui and viewport comparison feature for quick visualisation|Can make changes on the go with the help of inbuilt development tools|Mobile touch feature helps to test user experience in mobile viewports.
    ๐Ÿ‘Ž Cons:    Comparison is available for only 2 viewports, it forces users to select and deselect the devices repeatedly. a grid with more devices can be a better solution
  3. Alina-Novikava
    ยท Software QA Engineer at uTest ยท
    Must have tool for web designers & developers

    Responsive testing can be a really daunting task. To ensure that all media queries are working properly for specific screen sizes is bound to be time consuming. However, LT browser has made the task comparatively easy for me and my team. It enabled us to test on multiple pre installed devices in no time. Plus, we can test over 2 devices at the same time in a side by side view.

    Our development team relies heavily over this tool since it offers hassle-free local testing experience, supports hot-reloading and offers developer tools to help us debug any UI bug on the go.

    Even our design team loves the LT browser due to its intuitiveness. They are always intrigued to check if the changes are rendering well and as per the design or not after every release cycle. With LT browser, they can do it easily without having to install anything or dealing with developer tools mobile-view debugging

    ๐Ÿ Competitors: Blisk
    ๐Ÿ‘ Pros:    You can integrate project management tools like jira|Simulate network bandwidth to test your website.|It offers two device views, which makes comparing easy by mirroring actions.|You get 30+ pre installed devices to test on and also make your own custom resolution device.
    ๐Ÿ‘Ž Cons:    Testing on an internet explorer using our custom device, there is no option!

Captain Stack Reviews

3 alternatives to GitHub Copilot to keep an eye out for
Human resource managers and Stackoverflow are analogous to developers and Stackoverflow. We require platforms and tools. Captain Stack is an open-source VSCode plugin that combines the two. Inspired by Copilot, it is a code suggestion tool that uses Google instead of AI. It submits your search query to Google, retrieves answers from StackOverflow and Github Gist, and...
Top 10 GitHub Copilot Alternatives
Stackoverflow and developers are similar to LinkedIn and HR professionals. An open-source VSCode plugin called Captain Stack combines elements of both.
Source: hashdork.com
Top 9 GitHub Copilot alternatives to try in 2022 (free and paid)
Developers and Stackoverflow are like human resources managers and LinkedIn. We need our platforms and tools. Captain Stack is an open-source VSCode plugin that is a bit of both. Inspired by Copilot, Captain Stack is a code suggestion tool that uses Google instead of AI. It sends your search query to Google, retrieves StackOverflow and Github Gist answers, and auto-completes...
Source: www.tabnine.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Captain Stack seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

LT Browser by Lambdatest mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of LT Browser by Lambdatest yet. Tracking of LT Browser by Lambdatest recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Captain Stack mentions (2)

  • Idea to profitable software product in 5 days: Hieu Nguyen on MVPs and LTDs
    I caught up with Hieu Nguyen (@hieunc) of ishim, Rebit, Captain Stack, and more. He told me exactly how he made his first sale for ishim within five days of kicking off development, and another $1K+ within a month. Source: over 2 years ago
  • GitHub Copilot Breaks Bad Interviews
    In fact, many have pointed out that Copilotโ€™s process of looking up code based on its expected constraints is similar to one that a developer might experience by searching StackOverflow for code snippets. Funnily, some thought the idea so similar they decided to build an alternative VSCode plugin to Copilot that simply looks up StackOverflow answers as suggestions. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LT Browser by Lambdatest and Captain Stack, you can also consider the following products

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

GitHub Copilot - Your AI pair programmer. With GitHub Copilot, get suggestions for whole lines or entire functions right inside your editor.

CrossBrowserTesting - Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

Visual Studio IntelliCode - Visual Studio IntelliCode is an experimental set of AI-assisted development capabilities for next-generation developer productivity.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

GPT-Code-Clippy - GPT-Code-Clippy (GPT-CC) is an open source version of GitHub Copilot, a language model -- based on GPT-3, called GPT-Codex -- that is fine-tuned on publicly available code from GitHub.