Loom is a screen recording extension for Chrome that gives people the ability to create and share media. Create your own videos using your camera, screen view, and audio. Read more about Loom.
Do-It-Yourself Data Analytics & Business Intelligence, Powered by AI
sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Which is more popular?
Fluid might be a bit more popular than
Loom.
We know about 19 links to it since March 2021
and only 19 links to Loom.
social mentions
19 vs 19
Screen Recording popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 78
Base details
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
Ease of Use Loom offers a highly intuitive interface that makes recording, sharing, and managing videos easy, even for users who are not tech-savvy.
Speed Loom allows for quick video recording, instant sharing, and embedding, which can greatly save time, especially for team communication and support tasks.
Integrations Loom integrates with various tools like Slack, Google Drive, and GitHub, providing seamless workflow enhancements.
Viewer Analytics Loom provides video engagement analytics, including viewer activity and completion rates, which helps understand the effectiveness of the content.
Cross-Platform Availability Loom is available on multiple platforms, including Chrome, Windows, Mac, and mobile devices, making it versatile for different user environments.
Team Collaboration Loom offers features specifically geared towards teams, allowing for shared libraries, comments, and real-time notifications.
Possible disadvantages
Limited Editing Features While Loom allows some basic editing, it lacks the advanced editing capabilities found in more robust video editing software.
Bandwidth Usage Recording high-quality video can be demanding on internet bandwidth, which might be an issue in areas with slower internet speeds.
Cost The free version of Loom has usage limits and fewer features compared to its paid plans, which might be a constraint for budget-conscious users.
Data Privacy As with any cloud service, there are potential concerns about data privacy and security, which may not be suitable for highly sensitive information.
Video Length Limitations The free tier imposes restrictions on the maximum length of videos, which could be a hindrance for users needing to create longer content.
Dedicated Browsers Fluid creates site-specific browsers that allow users to have dedicated apps for their favorite web pages. This can enhance focus and organization by keeping tasks separate from regular web browsing.
Custom User Experience Each Site Specific Browser (SSB) can have a custom icon and name, providing a more personalized and aesthetically pleasing user interface.
Resource Management Having dedicated apps for regularly used web services can minimize the use of browser tabs and extensions, potentially leading to better performance and resource management.
Independence from Web Browser Fluid apps are independent of the main web browser. This means that if your browser crashes or has issues, your Fluid apps remain unaffected.
Enhanced Productivity By converting web apps into standalone desktop applications, users can more easily compartmentalize their work, leading to enhanced productivity.
Possible disadvantages
Limited to MacOS Fluid is available only for MacOS, which limits its usability to Mac users and excludes users on other operating systems like Windows or Linux.
Manual Updates Users need to manually update each Site Specific Browser (SSB) created through Fluid, as these do not automatically update like regular browser tabs.
Security Risks As Fluid apps are essentially wrappers for web pages, they are subject to the same security risks as any web browser. Users need to ensure they are visiting trusted sites.
Limited Functionality Unlike full-fledged desktop applications, Fluid apps might have limited native functionality. They rely heavily on the web app's own features and may lack advanced desktop integrations.
Cost for Full Features While Fluid is free to use, certain advanced features, such as pinning apps to the status bar, require a one-time purchase of Fluid's paid version.
Analysis
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
LoomFluid
Overall verdict
Yes, Loom is considered a good tool for asynchronous communication, particularly in professional settings. It is effective for enhancing communication clarity, saving time, and improving productivity.
Why this product is good
Loom is favored for its user-friendly interface, ease of use, and efficiency in creating and sharing video messages. It enables users to quickly record their screens, voice, and webcam, making it suitable for a range of professional and personal communication needs. The platform is particularly useful for those who want to provide clear, visual explanations or updates without the need for arranging meetings or lengthy emails.
Recommended for
Remote teams needing asynchronous communication tools.
Educators creating video tutorials or lectures.
Sales teams making personalized video pitches.
Product teams explaining features or demonstrating product use.
Anyone needing to communicate complex information quickly and clearly.
Overall verdict
Fluid is a good option for macOS users who find themselves frequently switching between web applications and want a more streamlined process. It's especially useful for those who prefer to keep web app sessions isolated or those who enjoy customizing their workflows. However, consider that it is only available for macOS and may not support all features of more complex web applications.
Why this product is good
Fluid (fluidapp.com) allows users to create site-specific browsers, which can be useful for treating web applications as standalone apps on macOS. This can help with productivity by preventing web distractions and organizing workflows. Fluid is particularly beneficial if you frequently use web apps and want them to function like native applications with their own dock icons and separate sessions.
Recommended for
MacOS users looking to create desktop-like experiences for web applications.
Individuals seeking to minimize distractions from other open tabs in a standard browser.
Users who need isolated sessions for different web applications.
People who appreciate customizing their desktop workflow.
Loom caps free recordings at five minutes and quotes $18 a seat. Here is what the alternatives really cost, what each one is best at, and where Loom still wins.
Loom helps employees, sales professionals, and teams communicate better and faster. With Loom, you can coordinate asynchronously, empower customer support to meet customer expectations and needs, improve customer...
Loom is a modern, user-friendly screen recording app designed for diverse platforms and areas of use. Perfect for business settings, Loom lets you create and fine-tune screen recordings to be easily shared with your...
With a strong focus on simplicity and communication, Fluid UI great Prototyping tools. Having built-in high and low fidelity component libraries, live team collaboration, device previews and video presentations making...
Social recommendations and mentions
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.
Loom is a video recording tool that allows users to capture screenshares with voiceovers. In UAT, it’s used to show an application workflow, whether successful or buggy. Instead of listing steps to replicate a bug/workflow, you can...
- Source: dev.to
/
almost 2 years ago
How to Stand Out When Asking for a Job
Telling somebody, “I want to work for you” is only as good as the reasons you give them. If you show them that you can identify value that they need created and can create it, you take a lot of that work off of their plate. Loom is a...
Source:
over 3 years ago
Show HN: Walkie-Talkie for Badass Developers
Async meetings are pretty great), http://loom.com is pretty great. (don't work there, not even a paying customer, but even then it's transformed the way I work.).
- Source: Hacker News
/
over 3 years ago
> Is ToDesktop For Me? > If you want to make a desktop app of a website for your personal use, ToDesktop is overkill. I just want to point out that a lot of us "pros" learn how to use tools like this by semi-personal use. Therefore, you...
- Source: Hacker News
/
about 3 years ago
in safari Sonoma, do profiles act like containers ? (firefox container)
If you haven't used Fluid - https://fluidapp.com , I would recommend trying the free download.
Source:
over 3 years ago
Why is it so hard to change Chromium's UI?
You can use Min, Fluid or any browser with full screen mode to have the same effect.
Source:
over 3 years ago
Camtasia
ScreenStudio
Tella
OBS Studio
Screencastify
FocuSee
Snagit
WebCatalog New Tab
Nativeifier
ToDesktop
Rambox
Unite for macOS
Electron
Shift
