
ngrok
sish
Pinggy.io
LocalXpose
Pagekite
Localtunnel
zrok
Instantly share your localhost environment!

Create blank files, custom file types, templates, whole batches, and reusable folder setups exactly where you are working on macOS.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, localhost.run seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 42 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | localhost.run | createfilesplus.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of localhost.run yet.
CreateFiles+ adds the file creation workflow macOS should have had all along. Create a new file exactly where you are working, without opening TextEdit, saving-as, using Terminal, or dragging template files around. Use Finder right-click menus where macOS allows them, or fall back to the Finder...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No localhost.run videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
CreateFiles+ Demo
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing localhost.run and CreateFiles+.
CreateFiles+'s answer:
Xcode and Swift
CreateFiles+'s answer:
macOS should have created this feature out of the box but does not exist. Windows users have had this feature for over a decade. I created this to remove that gap for macOS users.
CreateFiles+'s answer:
I am not familiar with any competitors doing this today.
CreateFiles+'s answer:
Power Users, Developers, Productivity focused users, students, teachers, creators.
CreateFiles+'s answer:
Its brand new so that is yet to be determined.
CreateFiles+'s answer:
I have struggled with not having this capability in Finder for years and decided I would fix the problem for me and then see if other users would want the same solution.
Share your experience with using localhost.run and CreateFiles+. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


localhost.run is very similar to Serveo but with less features. In fact, as far as I can tell, it only does 1 thing: expose your local web server to the web with a public URL. And it does that well enough for me.
We have no reviews of CreateFiles+ yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


- This asciinema: https://asciinema.org/a/674501?t=111 Any unix machine (currently only fedora and debian based distro dependencies are auto installed. Passwordless sudo recommended) with tmux if you run this ssh command you’ll get a... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Localhost.run - Simple hosted SSH option. Supports custom domains for a cost. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Localhost.run — Expose locally running servers over a tunnel to a public URL. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Tracking CreateFiles+ since Jun 2026.
When comparing localhost.run and CreateFiles+, you can also consider the following products.

ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.
Compare ngrok to localhost.run or CreateFiles+:

An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.
Compare sish to localhost.run or CreateFiles+:

Public URLs for localhost without downloading any binary
Compare Pinggy.io to localhost.run or CreateFiles+:

Your network without the IT work. Radically simple, always-on tunneling service for mission-critical applications.
Compare LocalXpose to localhost.run or CreateFiles+:

