Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

LoadComplete VS CMark

Compare LoadComplete VS CMark and see what are their differences

LoadComplete logo LoadComplete

The only load testing tool to record, replay, and test in real browsers at scale.

CMark logo CMark

CMark is CommonMark implementation based on the C reference, which is a rationalized version of the Markdown syntax coming with the spec.
  • LoadComplete Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-01
  • CMark Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-01

LoadComplete features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    LoadComplete offers an intuitive interface that allows users to easily set up and execute load tests without needing extensive technical knowledge.
  • Comprehensive Reporting
    The tool provides detailed reports and analytics, making it easier for users to understand performance metrics and identify bottlenecks.
  • Integration Capabilities
    LoadComplete integrates well with various CI/CD tools, enhancing its utility in automated testing environments.
  • Real Browser Testing
    It enables testing using real browsers, ensuring that load tests closely simulate real user interactions and provide more accurate performance data.

Possible disadvantages of LoadComplete

  • Cost
    The pricing of LoadComplete can be high for small organizations or individuals, potentially limiting its accessibility for budget-conscious users.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running extensive tests may require significant computing resources, which could impact other operations if not managed properly.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its usability, some aspects of the tool might have a learning curve, especially for users unfamiliar with load testing concepts.
  • Limited Protocol Support
    Compared to some other load testing tools, LoadComplete may support fewer protocols, which could be a limitation for testing complex systems.

CMark features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis of LoadComplete

Overall verdict

  • LoadComplete (LoadNinja) is a powerful and reliable tool for teams looking for a comprehensive, scalable solution to performance testing. It's especially beneficial for teams that require ease of use and the ability to quickly execute and iterate tests without deep technical expertise in testing frameworks.

Why this product is good

  • LoadComplete, or LoadNinja, is renowned for its user-friendly interface and robust performance testing capabilities. It allows testers to create and execute performance tests without extensive programming knowledge, making it accessible to various users. Its cloud-based infrastructure facilitates realistic load testing scenarios by simulating thousands of users without the need for significant hardware investments. Additionally, its integration capabilities with popular CI/CD tools streamline the testing process within modern development workflows. LoadComplete also provides detailed analytics and reporting, helping teams identify performance bottlenecks and optimize applications efficiently.

Recommended for

  • Development teams looking for seamless integration with existing CI/CD pipelines
  • QA teams seeking a user-friendly interface for performance testing
  • Organizations that need to conduct scalable cloud-based load testing
  • Businesses aiming to identify and resolve performance issues rapidly to improve user experience

LoadComplete videos

LoadComplete 101: Getting Started in LoadComplete | SmartBear Academy

More videos:

  • Review - Hello Yogurt Game Review 1080p Official LoadComplete
  • Review - Hello Yogurt Game Review 1080p Official LoadComplete

CMark videos

No CMark videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to LoadComplete and CMark)
Monitoring Tools
87 87%
13% 13
Website Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Tool
0 0%
100% 100
Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using LoadComplete and CMark. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CMark should be more popular than LoadComplete. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

LoadComplete mentions (1)

  • Automated Performance Testing?
    Browser Testing: Hit pages with virtual users performing a flow e.g. Sign up, login. If you want a report of how many "real" users can use your app concurrently, then this testing would give the closest "real" world statistics. Cons - price and requires JS/TS scripting knowledge. Tools: BrowserStorm, Flood.IO, LoadNinja. Source: over 4 years ago

CMark mentions (6)

  • Why Is This Site Built with C
    Using a portable minimal markdown dependency (such as cmark [1]) I think markdown can be quite a low barrier here. I personally do similar to what you have described on my blog, with an additional cmark conversion and find it quite simple [2]. [1] https://github.com/commonmark/cmark. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Ask HN: What's the simplest static website generator?
    I use GNU make. Write content in markdown, feed it to https://github.com/commonmark/cmark to create html. I intended to splice files together using xslt but echo and cat written in the makefile sufficed. I'm not totally sure I'd recommend that but I do like the markdown => html flow. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Building a Personal Internet from Markdown Files
    I seem to be in the middle of trying to build something similar to this. I want it to run on an android phone but otherwise the same sort of idea, offline-first information I want access to. There's some weirdness around android browsers refusing to load html from the phone itself on security grounds. The OP uses a "progressive web app" which seems to be the proper way to do this at some point in the past, but... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Using Rust with Elixir for code reuse and performance
    Yeah no doubt it, although in this case the C implementation has been a long running project that's under the official commonmark GitHub repo at https://github.com/commonmark/cmark. But I think the most important thing here is an Elixir NIF already exists to use it. The blog post as is leaves readers having to implement ~100 lines of Elixir code to use the Rust version because the authors of blog post didn't... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
  • How do I link and use a c library?
    I'm confused about how to use a c library (specifically, cmark) from zig. Source: about 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LoadComplete and CMark, you can also consider the following products

WebLOAD - WebLOAD - The most flexible and cost effective software for enterprise load, stress and performance testing, integrated with DevOps processes. Click for details

CrystalMark - CrystalMark is a full included benchmark application that can be utilized for surveying the execution and capacities of a PC.

OctoPerf - OctoPerf is a SaaS load testing solution, based on JMeter.

Bazel - Bazel is a tool that automates software builds and tests.

SmartMeter.io - Performance Testing with Enterprise-Level Features with a familiar jMeter interface

fio - Generate I/O for benchmarking, stress testing, verification or workload reproduction purposes.