
Ruffle
Flash Player 2021
SuperNova Player
Newgrounds Player
CheerpX for Flash
OpenSilver
Gnash
The Lightspark project

CodeShare.io
Visual Studio Live Share
Teletype for Atom
Dabblet
Codeply
Liveweave
Floobits
Live share IDEs and coding sessions. See changes in real time.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Lightspark should be more popular than CodeTogether. It has been mentioned 9 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | lightspark.github.io | codetogether.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | 2020 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Lightspark yet.
CodeTogether is the perfect blend of functionality and simplicity, designed by a team of remote developers that rely on collaborative development. Whether you are on an Agile team that uses pair programming as part of your regular software development flow or you just like to live share your code...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No Lightspark videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
CodeTogether: The Complete Overview to Live Sharing your IDE
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Lightspark and CodeTogether. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Not the first attempted Flash reimplementation[1,2,3]. The GNU one didn’t work all that well back in the day as far as I remember, but then Flash was a moving target at the time. [1]: https://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/ [2]:... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
A true emulator would be something like Ruffle or Lightspark. Ruffle I know doesn't work well with Walfas last time I checked. I don't know about Lightspark. Source: about 4 years ago
Lightspark, a browser plugin written in C++. It's a work in progress, not every flash content will work. Modern mainstream browsers don't support running it within a page, so flash content needs to be run in a standalone lightspark app,... Source: over 4 years ago
Looking for collaboration and advanced features? Most decent ones cost money ... Start with replit.com, also look at codeanywhere.com, and also codetogether.com (requires download, free+paid plans). Source: almost 5 years ago
Are you using the right tools? Screen sharing isn't great for longer sessions, and you need a code focused tool like Live Share, or one we make - CodeTogether, especially if you need to work across IDEs. Source: over 5 years ago
Just addressing the pair programming aspect of this - if you were doing this remotely, you could use something like codetogether.com Each of you would have your own machines and screens, but be looking at the same piece of code (if you... Source: over 5 years ago
When comparing Lightspark and CodeTogether, you can also consider the following products.


Realtime code sharing for developers
Compare CodeShare.io to Lightspark or CodeTogether:

Want to fix "This plugin is not supported" and "Adobe Flash Player is blocked" error messages? This extension will remove those messages and allow you to play Flash in any website with a single click.
Compare Flash Player 2021 to Lightspark or CodeTogether:

Real-time collaborative development
Compare Visual Studio Live Share to Lightspark or CodeTogether:
SuperNova Player allows systems to play .SWF files in a standalone player launched from any browser.
Compare SuperNova Player to Lightspark or CodeTogether:
Collaborate in real time in Atom
Compare Teletype for Atom to Lightspark or CodeTogether: