Software Alternatives & Startups

LibreNMS VS Netdata

Compare LibreNMS VS Netdata and see what are their differences

LibreNMS

A fully featured network monitoring system that provides a wealth of features and device support.

LibreNMS Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Netdata

Monitor your servers, containers, and applications, in high-resolution and in real-time.

Netdata Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source Freemium Free trial $3 / Monthly (Netdata Pro, $3 /Node /mo - Netdata Business, $4 /Node /mo )

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Netdata seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 6 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 6
Monitoring Tools popularity
46% vs 54%
alternatives listed
155 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

LibreNMS
Netdata
Website librenms.org netdata.cloud
Pricing
Open source
Open source Freemium Free trial $3 / Monthly (Netdata Pro, $3 /Node /mo - Netdata Business, $4 /Node /mo ) Official pricing
Platforms
Linux Docker AWS Azure Mac OSX Cloud Windows Edge NGINX Oracle +7
Company 2018
Listed in

About LibreNMS and Netdata

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

LibreNMS
Netdata

No description of LibreNMS yet.

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It is designed to run on all physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters, and edge/IoT devices, to monitor your systems, containers & applications. Scales nicely from a single server...

Read more about Netdata

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

LibreNMS 7 features
Netdata 5 features
  • Open Source
    LibreNMS is open-source software, allowing you to customize, modify, and distribute it freely. This also means it has a community of contributors who help improve and maintain the project.
  • Vendor-Agnostic
    Supports a wide range of network devices and vendors, making it a versatile network monitoring tool capable of managing heterogeneous environments.
  • Scalability
    Designed to scale from small office networks to large data center environments, ensuring it can grow with your network infrastructure needs.
  • Auto Discovery
    Includes automatic network discovery capabilities which help in identifying and adding devices to the monitoring system effortlessly.
  • Extensive Features
    Offers a robust set of features including alerting, graphing, and support for a variety of network protocols (e.g., SNMP, ICMP, BGP).
  • Integration
    Integrates well with other tools and services such as RANCID, Collectd, Nagios, and more, enhancing its capabilities in various IT ecosystem setups.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Provides an intuitive web-based interface that makes it easier for administrators to navigate and use the tool effectively.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Initial Setup
    The initial setup can be complex and time-consuming, especially for users who are not familiar with network monitoring systems.
  • Resource Intensive
    Requires significant server resources (CPU, memory, disk space) as your network grows, which could necessitate infrastructure upgrades.
  • Learning Curve
    Has a steep learning curve for new users, particularly those who are not experienced with network monitoring tools.
  • Documentation
    While there is documentation available, it can sometimes be lacking in detail or out-of-date, making it difficult for users to troubleshoot or fully utilize all features.
  • Community Support
    Relies heavily on community support which can be inconsistent and may not always provide timely solutions for critical issues.
  • Third-Party Dependencies
    Requires several third-party dependencies for full functionality, making the setup process more complicated and sometimes leading to compatibility issues.
  • Dashboards & visualizations
    Digestible, intuitive, and visually appealing charts for troubleshooting.
  • Configurable
    Zero configuration. Zero maintenance. No preparations. Sane defaults. Auto-detection for all metrics. Immediately usable.
  • Metrics
    Netdata collects, stores and visualizes all the metrics available. We almost never filter out metrics. The more metrics, the better.
  • Real time monitoring
    Netdata is real-time. It collects all metrics every second and it has a data collection to visualization latency of less than a millisecond.
  • Analytics and Reporting
    Detailed analysis on how applications and systems are performing

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

LibreNMS
Netdata

Overall verdict

  • Yes, LibreNMS is generally considered a good solution for network monitoring, especially for medium to large environments. Its open-source nature also makes it a cost-effective choice compared to some proprietary alternatives, and it offers a great deal of flexibility through its plugins and API.

Why this product is good

  • LibreNMS is a network monitoring tool that is known for its ease of use, extensive documentation, and active community support. It provides automated monitoring and discovery of network devices and supports a wide range of devices and operating systems. Its web-based interface is considered user-friendly and it offers comprehensive graphing and alerting capabilities.

Recommended for

    Network administrators and IT professionals who need an efficient and scalable monitoring solution for a variety of network devices. It's particularly well-suited for those who prefer open-source software and are interested in contributing to or benefitting from community-driven improvements and support.

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Netdata is generally regarded as a valuable tool for system monitoring and troubleshooting. It is praised for its speed, ease of use, and detailed insights, making it an effective solution for diverse monitoring needs.

Why this product is good

  • Netdata is considered good because it provides real-time monitoring and troubleshooting of systems. It offers detailed insights with minimal resource consumption, and features a user-friendly interface, making it accessible for both technical and non-technical users. Its open-source nature allows for customization and integration with other data sources, enhancing its capabilities.

Recommended for

  • IT professionals who need real-time system diagnostics
  • DevOps teams seeking efficient monitoring tools
  • Small to medium enterprises looking for cost-effective monitoring solutions
  • Open-source enthusiasts who prefer customizable software
  • Organizations that require scalable monitoring solutions across different environments

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

LibreNMS 5 videos + Add
Netdata 2 videos + Add

Network Monitoring - LibreNMS

More videos

  • Review - NLNOG day 2017 - Neil Lathwood (LibreNMS) - Monitoring Everything
  • Review - [LibreNMS] Explaining alert rules
  • Tutorial - Introduction to LibreNMS and Prime Features - LibreNMS
  • Tutorial - LibreNMS Application -Apache

Install Netdata on Linux in two minutes

More videos

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
LibreNMS
Netdata
46% 46%
54% 54%
41% 41%
59% 59%
46% 46%
54% 54%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using LibreNMS and Netdata. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

LibreNMS no reviews yet
Netdata no reviews yet

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

LibreNMS 0 mentions
Netdata 6 mentions

Tracking LibreNMS since Mar 2021.

  • From Netdata Inspiration to SaaS MVP: Server Monitoring with Bun + Claude Code Opus 4.6
    If you've ever set up Netdata, you know that feeling — hundreds of real-time charts, per-second granularity, metrics you didn't even know your kernel exposed. It's a wonderful piece of software, genuinely one of the best open-source... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Trying to decide best practices for production environment
    Pros are instant HA and Migration. Cons are huge bandwidth hits. With your 4x1gbe you would be maxed out on replicating those 25 VMs. You wouldn't have anything for users. I have a test lab with 4 nodes, 22cpu 100gbram and 30tb... Source: over 3 years ago
  • Ask HN: Reducing the maintenance surface area of hosting a small internal app
    Docker-compose, not k8s. Set up a script to update the OS, pull all your containers and reboot after hours once a week or once a day. Make sure the script specifies non interactive. Set up alerting for low disk space, see... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

View more

Alternatives to LibreNMS and Netdata

When comparing LibreNMS and Netdata, you can also consider the following products.