Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

lf (file manager) VS WCM Commander

Compare lf (file manager) VS WCM Commander and see what are their differences

lf (file manager) logo lf (file manager)

Terminal file manager written in Go (programming language).

WCM Commander logo WCM Commander

Multi-platform open source file manager.
  • lf (file manager) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-04
  • WCM Commander Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-09

lf (file manager) features and specs

  • Speed
    Being a terminal-based file manager, lf is fast and snappy, providing swift navigation and file manipulation compared to GUI-based file managers.
  • Minimalistic Design
    With its simple and minimal interface, lf is less distracting and allows users to focus more on managing files effectively without unnecessary bells and whistles.
  • Keyboard-driven
    Offers efficient, keyboard-driven navigation and file management, increasing productivity for users comfortable with mouse-less interaction.
  • Configurable
    Highly configurable with the ability to customize key bindings, appearance, and integrate with external tools, making it adaptable to various workflows.
  • Cross-platform
    Available on multiple operating systems, including Unix-like systems and Windows, providing a consistent experience across different environments.
  • Vi-like Key Bindings
    Supports vi-like key bindings by default, which can be appealing to users familiar with the vi or vim editors who can extend their keyboard proficiency to file management.

Possible disadvantages of lf (file manager)

  • Steep Learning Curve
    The reliance on keyboard input and lack of graphical user interface elements can be difficult for users unfamiliar with terminal-based applications.
  • Limited Functionality
    May lack out-of-the-box features found in some GUI file managers, such as drag-and-drop support, thumbnail previews, and built-in synchronization capabilities.
  • Dependency on Terminal
    Since lf runs within a terminal, users must be comfortable navigating and operating within a terminal environment, which might not be ideal for everyone.
  • No Built-in Viewer
    Lf doesn't offer a built-in file viewer, requiring users to configure and rely on external programs to open or preview files, adding an extra configuration step.
  • Customization Required
    While lf is highly configurable, it requires users to spend time and effort in setting up custom configurations to tailor it to their specific needs.

WCM Commander features and specs

  • Dual-pane Interface
    WCM Commander features a dual-pane layout which allows users to easily manage files by viewing two directories at once, enhancing productivity and simplifying file operations like copying and moving.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    WCM Commander is available on multiple platforms including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it a versatile choice for users who operate across different operating systems.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, WCM Commander allows users to examine and modify the source code, contributing to transparency and enabling customization according to user needs.
  • Customizable UI
    The tool offers a customizable user interface, letting users tailor the look and functionality to suit their individual preferences and improve usability.
  • Integration with External Tools
    WCM Commander supports integration with various external tools such as editors and viewers, allowing users to create a more efficient and connected workflow.

Possible disadvantages of WCM Commander

  • Limited Plugin Availability
    Compared to other file managers, WCM Commander has fewer plugins available, which may limit the expandability options for users looking for additional features.
  • Smaller User Community
    The tool has a smaller user base compared to more established file managers, potentially leading to less community support and fewer online resources.
  • Occasional Stability Issues
    Some users have reported occasional stability issues, such as crashes or freezes, which can disrupt the user experience especially during intensive tasks.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might face a learning curve due to the multiple features and customization options, which can be overwhelming for those accustomed to simpler file managers.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    WCM Commander may lack some advanced features and functionalities found in more comprehensive file management solutions, potentially limiting its use for power users.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to lf (file manager) and WCM Commander)
FTP Client
80 80%
20% 20
File Manager
76 76%
24% 24
Robo-Advisor
100 100%
0% 0
File Management
49 49%
51% 51

User comments

Share your experience with using lf (file manager) and WCM Commander. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, lf (file manager) seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 65 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

lf (file manager) mentions (65)

View more

WCM Commander mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of WCM Commander yet. Tracking of WCM Commander recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing lf (file manager) and WCM Commander, you can also consider the following products

nnn - Fast and resource-sensitive file manager for the terminal

Midnight Commander - GNU Midnight Commander is a visual file manager, licensed under GNU General Public License and...

Broot - Commandline app to simplify directory navigation.

Vifm - Vifm is a ncurses based file manager with vi like keybindings.

CliFM - CliFM is a completely CLI-based, shell-like and KISS file manager written in C: simple, fast, and lightweight as hell.

fman - An unexpected gift. January 07, 2018 by Michael. One of the nice things that happened last week was an fman user writing in to say that 1) fman "is THE BEST SOFTWARE" (sic). And that 2) he would like to send me a $50 tip.