Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

lf (file manager) VS Ubuntu Unity

Compare lf (file manager) VS Ubuntu Unity and see what are their differences

This page does not exist

lf (file manager) logo lf (file manager)

Terminal file manager written in Go (programming language).

Ubuntu Unity logo Ubuntu Unity

A powerful blend of Ubuntu and Unity - to give you the most complete and cohesive Linux Desktop Experience.
  • lf (file manager) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-04
  • Ubuntu Unity Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-05

lf (file manager) features and specs

  • Speed
    Being a terminal-based file manager, lf is fast and snappy, providing swift navigation and file manipulation compared to GUI-based file managers.
  • Minimalistic Design
    With its simple and minimal interface, lf is less distracting and allows users to focus more on managing files effectively without unnecessary bells and whistles.
  • Keyboard-driven
    Offers efficient, keyboard-driven navigation and file management, increasing productivity for users comfortable with mouse-less interaction.
  • Configurable
    Highly configurable with the ability to customize key bindings, appearance, and integrate with external tools, making it adaptable to various workflows.
  • Cross-platform
    Available on multiple operating systems, including Unix-like systems and Windows, providing a consistent experience across different environments.
  • Vi-like Key Bindings
    Supports vi-like key bindings by default, which can be appealing to users familiar with the vi or vim editors who can extend their keyboard proficiency to file management.

Possible disadvantages of lf (file manager)

  • Steep Learning Curve
    The reliance on keyboard input and lack of graphical user interface elements can be difficult for users unfamiliar with terminal-based applications.
  • Limited Functionality
    May lack out-of-the-box features found in some GUI file managers, such as drag-and-drop support, thumbnail previews, and built-in synchronization capabilities.
  • Dependency on Terminal
    Since lf runs within a terminal, users must be comfortable navigating and operating within a terminal environment, which might not be ideal for everyone.
  • No Built-in Viewer
    Lf doesn't offer a built-in file viewer, requiring users to configure and rely on external programs to open or preview files, adding an extra configuration step.
  • Customization Required
    While lf is highly configurable, it requires users to spend time and effort in setting up custom configurations to tailor it to their specific needs.

Ubuntu Unity features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

lf (file manager) videos

No lf (file manager) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Ubuntu Unity videos

Ubuntu Unity 23.10 - A Great Linux Distro - Review !

More videos:

  • Review - What happened to Ubuntu Unity??
  • Review - Ubuntu Unity: Ubuntu's Biggest Regret? (First Impressions)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to lf (file manager) and Ubuntu Unity)
FTP Client
100 100%
0% 0
Linux
0 0%
100% 100
File Manager
84 84%
16% 16
Robo-Advisor
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using lf (file manager) and Ubuntu Unity. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, lf (file manager) seems to be a lot more popular than Ubuntu Unity. While we know about 65 links to lf (file manager), we've tracked only 5 mentions of Ubuntu Unity. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

lf (file manager) mentions (65)

View more

Ubuntu Unity mentions (5)

  • Omakub – Opinionated Ubuntu Setup
    > Ubuntu out of the box is not a great experience. I personally went with Linux Mint, because it doesn't try to push snaps and honestly the Cinnamon desktop is lovely and gets out of the way, a bit like XFCE but in some ways more polished: https://www.linuxmint.com/ It's nice that I don't even need custom scripts, it's pretty good out of the box. That said, contrary to popular opinion, I actually liked back when... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • The KDE desktop gets an overhaul with Plasma 6
    Unity is back. An enthusiast resurrected it and now it's an official Ubuntu flavour again: https://ubuntuunity.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Rethinking Window Management in Gnome
    > I wish Unity didn't die Hi from Unity on Ubuntu 23.04. I am running the Unity flavour: https://ubuntuunity.org/ It uses the latest Unity 7.7, released earlier this year: https://gitlab.com/ubuntu-unity/unity-x/unityx I run it on 3 or 4 machines, one of which has 2 screens and one of which has 3. Works great, scales well, handles modern Ubuntu just fine. I use it with the Waterfox browser, which integrates... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Rolling release between Arch and Rhino(Ubuntu based)
    I'm sorry, but Ubuntu Unity takes the cake for the best distro website https://ubuntuunity.org/. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Question about changing desktop environments
    Canonical dropped development of Unity in 2017 (if I remember correctly), but there is https://ubuntuunity.org/ which is not affiliated with Canonical. Source: about 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing lf (file manager) and Ubuntu Unity, you can also consider the following products

nnn - Fast and resource-sensitive file manager for the terminal

pcmanfm-qt - pcmanfm-qt is a QT port of PCManFM that is the default file manager for the LXQR desktop.

Broot - Commandline app to simplify directory navigation.

CliFM - CliFM is a completely CLI-based, shell-like and KISS file manager written in C: simple, fast, and lightweight as hell.

jFileProcessor - A developers file manager.

xplr - Fast and hackable file manager for the terminal.