Software Alternatives & Startups

Kitty terminal VS Refocus

Compare Kitty terminal VS Refocus and see what are their differences

Kitty terminal

Super fast, GPU and OpenGL based terminal emulator with tiling support

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Refocus

Saving 137M jobs from AI β€” the retraining platform for SEA

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Kitty terminal seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 100 times since March 2021.

social mentions
100 vs 0
SSH popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 146

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Kitty terminal
Refocus
Website sw.kovidgoyal.net refocus.me
Pricing
Open source
β€”
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Kitty terminal 6 features
Refocus 5 features
  • Performance
    Kitty is designed to be a fast and efficient terminal, with support for GPU rendering. This can provide smoother and quicker display updates, especially beneficial for intensive command-line tasks.
  • Features
    Kitty offers a rich set of features including support for tabs, multiple layouts, and extensions. It also supports features like ligatures, image display, and sixel graphics.
  • Customization
    Kitty is highly customizable, allowing users to modify key bindings, color schemes, and more through its comprehensive configuration files.
  • Remote Control
    Kitty provides a remote control framework, which allows users to script and control the terminal from the command line or other external programs.
  • Platform Support
    Kitty is available on multiple platforms including Linux, macOS, and Windows (through WSL), making it versatile for various operating systems.
  • Active Development
    The terminal is actively maintained by its developers, ensuring regular updates, bug fixes, and the addition of new features.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    Given its extensive feature set and customization options, there can be a steep learning curve for new users unfamiliar with its configuration and advanced features.
  • Configuration Complexity
    The extensive customization options, while powerful, can be overwhelming and may require a considerable amount of time to configure to a user's liking.
  • Font Support
    Although Kitty supports font ligatures and several other advanced font features, some users have reported occasional issues with font rendering and compatibility.
  • Resource Usage
    While designed for performance, the use of GPU rendering can mean higher resource usage compared to simpler terminals, which might be noticeable on older hardware.
  • Documentation
    Though extensive, the documentation can sometimes be challenging to navigate for new users, making it harder to find specific information or solutions to particular problems.
  • No Native Windows Support
    Kitty does not have native Windows support; it runs on Windows through the Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL). This might not be ideal for users looking for a fully native Windows terminal experience.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Refocus offers a clean and intuitive user interface that makes it easy for users to navigate and use the application effectively.
  • Comprehensive Task Management
    The platform provides a wide range of task management features, allowing users to organize tasks, set priorities, and track progress efficiently.
  • Collaboration Tools
    Refocus includes collaboration features that enable teams to work together on projects, communicate effectively, and share resources seamlessly.
  • Customization Options
    Users can customize various settings and features to tailor the platform to their specific workflow needs, improving overall productivity.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Refocus is available on multiple platforms, allowing users to access and manage their tasks from different devices and locations.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, new users might experience a learning curve while getting accustomed to all of the platform's features.
  • Cost
    Some users might find the subscription pricing of Refocus to be a bit high, especially for small teams or individuals.
  • Limited Offline Functionality
    The platform's functionality may be restricted when offline, which can be a drawback for users needing consistent access without internet connectivity.
  • Feature Overload
    While comprehensive, some users may find the extensive range of features overwhelming, particularly if they need a simple task management tool.
  • Occasional Performance Issues
    Users have reported occasional lag or performance slowdowns, particularly when working with large amounts of data or complex projects.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Kitty terminal
Refocus

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Kitty is a highly regarded terminal emulator that is considered good by many users.

Why this product is good

  • Kitty is fast, feature-rich, and supports GPU rendering, which can improve performance. It is highly customizable, supports modern terminal features, and has a friendly and active community. Additionally, it supports features like tabs, layouts, and window management, which many users find convenient.

Recommended for

  • Users who require a fast and efficient terminal emulator.
  • Those who need advanced features and customization options.
  • Developers who appreciate GPU acceleration for rendering.
  • Anyone looking for a terminal emulator with active community support.

No analysis of Refocus yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Kitty terminal 1 video + Add
Refocus 3 videos + Add

Kitty Is A Fast And Feature Rich Terminal Emulator

Refocus Student Success Story Joshua πŸ”₯

More videos

  • - Refocus Student Joshua Cruz Shares His Secrets to Freelancing Success
  • - Refocus, Review and Rebuild.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Kitty terminal
Refocus
100% 100%
SSH
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Kitty terminal and Refocus. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Kitty terminal 100 mentions
Refocus 0 mentions
  • My fully offline AI-assisted Linux development machine
    Terminal: I use Kitty. I have tabs, splits, clipboard bindings, quick access terminal, and a few custom keybindings. It is fast, it works well on Wayland, and it does not get in my way. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Why I traded my custom "Opinionated Linux" for Omarchy
    I've been using Omarchy as my main setup since June 26, 2025, the day DHH released the first version. Before that I had my own custom Opinionated Linux, mclovin-ARCHived: an Arch + i3wm installer set up exactly the way I liked. It was... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Your Terminal Is Burning Battery Like It's Mining Bitcoin
    I was wondering also. If it can help, there is an overview on Kitty's website : https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

View more

Tracking Refocus since Jan 2023.

Alternatives to Kitty terminal and Refocus

When comparing Kitty terminal and Refocus, you can also consider the following products.