Performance
Kitty is designed to be a fast and efficient terminal, with support for GPU rendering. This can provide smoother and quicker display updates, especially beneficial for intensive command-line tasks.
Features
Kitty offers a rich set of features including support for tabs, multiple layouts, and extensions. It also supports features like ligatures, image display, and sixel graphics.
Customization
Kitty is highly customizable, allowing users to modify key bindings, color schemes, and more through its comprehensive configuration files.
Remote Control
Kitty provides a remote control framework, which allows users to script and control the terminal from the command line or other external programs.
Platform Support
Kitty is available on multiple platforms including Linux, macOS, and Windows (through WSL), making it versatile for various operating systems.
Active Development
The terminal is actively maintained by its developers, ensuring regular updates, bug fixes, and the addition of new features.
Yes, Kitty is a highly regarded terminal emulator that is considered good by many users.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Kitty terminal is good.
Check the traffic stats of Kitty terminal on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Kitty terminal on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Kitty terminal's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Kitty terminal on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Kitty terminal on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Terminal: I use Kitty. I have tabs, splits, clipboard bindings, quick access terminal, and a few custom keybindings. It is fast, it works well on Wayland, and it does not get in my way. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
I've been using Omarchy as my main setup since June 26, 2025, the day DHH released the first version. Before that I had my own custom Opinionated Linux, mclovin-ARCHived: an Arch + i3wm installer set up exactly the way I liked. It was total control over the OS: me deciding what goes in, keeping every piece (i3wm, polybar, picom, kitty, dotfiles) up to date and making sure they all talked to each other for the... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
I was wondering also. If it can help, there is an overview on Kitty's website : https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
It works on any terminal that supports the Kitty graphics protocol โ Ghostty and Kitty are the two main ones. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
I enjoy it, and itโs great to have another modern high performance terminal as an option for macOS and Linux. For me, Kitty still has the edge: https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/ WezTerm is also a strong contender: https://wezterm.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Claude Code comes with a notification hook. Some terminals support it natively (iTerm2, Kitty, Ghostty) but most donโt, and even when they do, itโs a system notification which is easy to miss if you step away. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
To be fair, for those of us who live in a terminal, the terminal is/was not solved. Old terminals are slow and have a bunch of weird Unicode issues. Now, Warp is a terrible product, and I have nothing nice to say about them. But look at modern terminals like Kitty or Ghostty. There are so many very nice improvements. Like mouse support that works well (as opposed to "kind of works, but who needs a mouse?!, won't... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
Initially, I used the Mac's built-in Terminal, but encountered issues with font loading. This led me to explore alternative terminal options. I initially chose Kitty, but after the official release of Ghostty, I made the switch. It has been running flawlessly for me. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Kitty (https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty) has been my go to for many years and with tmux it's fantastic. I have heard a lot of great things about https://ghostty.org/ but haven't had a chance to check it out. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
The terminal I am currently using is st but I have also tested this "Vifm" enhancement in kitty and alacritty. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Oh, this might be the missing piece of the puzzle for me to get rid of tmux! I've been using screen/tmux for a long time. Recently I switched to kitty[0] locally. I like kitty a lot! But I've been stuck with tmux on my servers for session persistence. [0]: https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Besides the usual Firefox/Chrome, Spotify, etc I use the following: - Karabiner-Elements for key remapping, specifically, for making caps lock into ctrl/esc. I don't know of anything else that does this job. Everyone who remaps keys seems to use this. - Kitty as my terminal of choice. I spend most of my time logged in remotely to a server via ssh where I attach to a tmux session. Kitty was easy enough to... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
A terminal with built-in telemetry and a pricing model... Just what I never wanted! To avoid being too negative, I'll offer the option of Kitty[1]. My current favorite terminal. Supports many features. Including my personal favorites: * ctrl+c (as opposed to stupid things like ctrl+shift+c) to copy data only when you have content selected. Otherwise, ctrl+c sends a sigint like normal. * font ligature support (a... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
IME, this is like the golden age of terminal apps in general and macOS-compatible ones in particular. There are several really good terminals for macOS: [iTerm2 app](https://iterm2.com/) [Kitty terminal](https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/) [WezTerm terminal](https://wezfurlong.org/wezterm/index.html) [Alacritty](https://github.com/alacritty/alacritty) -... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
I havenโt tried this yet (so please take my commentary with a grain of salt), but my initial thoughts are: (1) it looks interesting, (2) it looks overwhelming (thereโs a lot going on in those screenshots), and (3) itโs likely slow (I might be completely wrong). To elaborate a bitโฆ 1. I love good design work and well-designed (UI-wise) software, and it certainly looks like the creators of Wave Terminal have made... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
There are lots of terminal projects recently. Ghostty (https://mitchellh.com/ghostty) and Terminal Click (https://terminal.click) come to mind. Also Warp and Fig but they don't appeal to me because they're proprietary (and Fig got acquired by Amazon). I've been very happy with kitty (https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/) for years and it would take a lot to make me switch. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
I favor kitty[0] and zutty[1]. Gnome terminal / libvte is and has always been slow, and alacritty might have good throughput, but sadly is high latency. 0. https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/ 1. https://tomscii.sig7.se/zutty/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
I loved Warp for it's speed, but the keybindings and lack of configuration didn't work for me. For example, it doesn't support "ctrl+x ctrl+e" which I use daily for editing long prompts in vim. I recently switched to (Kitty)[https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/] and I don't think I'm ever going back. It's not flashy and doesn't have any AI features. It's just a donation-funded, wickedly fast, highly configurable,... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
I may be alone on this, but kittyยน with sessions has nearly eliminated my use of tmux. [1] https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Kitty - Price: Free Fast, feature-rich, GPU-based terminal emulator for macOS. Source: about 3 years ago
I used iTerm2 on a daily basis for many years, but started using Kitty in late 2021 and now prefer it: https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Kitty terminal to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Kitty terminal good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Kitty terminal here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.