Software Alternatives & Startups

Killed by Google VS Opalstack

Compare Killed by Google VS Opalstack and see what are their differences

Killed by Google

Killed by Google is the open source list of dead Google products, services, and devices. It serves as a tribute and memorial of beloved services and products killed by Google.

Killed by Google Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Opalstack

Managed Hosting for developers, entrepreneurs, and businesses like yours

Opalstack Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Killed by Google seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1245 times since March 2021.

social mentions
1,245 vs 0
Website Directory popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Killed by Google
Opalstack
Website killedbygoogle.com opalstack.com
Pricing
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Killed by Google 5 features
Opalstack 5 features
  • Memorialization
    Killed by Google serves as a digital memorial for defunct Google products, allowing users to reminisce and understand the company's evolution over time.
  • Educational
    The site offers educational value by providing insight into Google's business decisions and the shifting priorities in tech, helping users and professionals understand market dynamics.
  • Transparency
    By cataloging discontinued products, the website promotes transparency, potentially holding Google accountable for its business practices and decisions.
  • Consumer Awareness
    It helps consumers and businesses be aware of the longevity and reliability of Google's products, which can inform their purchasing and usage decisions.
  • Historical Reference
    Acts as a valuable reference for developers, historians, and researchers studying the tech industry and product lifecycle.

Possible disadvantages

  • Negative Sentiment
    The site might propagate negative sentiment about Google by focusing solely on failures and discontinued products, overshadowing its successes and contributions.
  • Incomplete Picture
    Listing products without context can be misleading; users may not understand why certain products were discontinued or the strategic shifts behind these decisions.
  • Potential Bias
    The site can be perceived as biased, particularly if it appears to cherry-pick examples or doesn't offer balanced coverage of both successes and failures.
  • Lack of Official Data
    As an unofficial source, it may lack the nuanced details and official explanations that only Google can provide, leading to misinformation or misinterpretations.
  • Overwhelm Users
    The sheer number of discontinued projects might overwhelm users, leading to trust issues or reluctance to adopt new Google products due to fear of discontinuation.
  • Developer-Friendly Hosting
    Opalstack is designed with developers in mind, offering SSH access, Git integration, and support for multiple programming languages and frameworks including Python, Node.js, Ruby, and PHP, giving developers granular control over their hosting environment.
  • Affordable Pricing
    Opalstack offers competitive pricing for shared and managed hosting plans, making it an accessible option for small businesses, freelancers, and individual developers who need robust features without enterprise-level costs.
  • Modern Control Panel
    Opalstack provides a clean, modern, and intuitive web-based dashboard for managing sites, applications, databases, and email accounts, which is a significant improvement over older-style hosting control panels like cPanel.
  • Strong Support for Multiple Applications
    The platform supports a wide variety of application types including WordPress, Django, Flask, Express, static sites, and more, allowing users to host diverse projects on a single account with easy deployment.
  • Reliable Infrastructure and Support
    Opalstack is built by former WebFaction team members, bringing experienced hosting expertise. They offer responsive customer support and a reputation for stable, well-managed server infrastructure with good uptime.

Possible disadvantages

  • Smaller Community and Ecosystem
    Compared to major hosting providers like DigitalOcean, AWS, or even shared hosts like SiteGround, Opalstack has a smaller user base, which means fewer community tutorials, third-party guides, and forum discussions available for troubleshooting.
  • Limited Scalability Options
    Opalstack is primarily a shared hosting provider, which means it may not be the best choice for high-traffic applications or projects that require rapid, on-demand scaling of resources like CPU, RAM, or storage.
  • Not Ideal for Beginners
    While developer-friendly, Opalstack's approach can be intimidating for non-technical users. Setting up applications often requires familiarity with the command line and server configuration, which may not suit those looking for simple one-click solutions.
  • Limited Data Center Locations
    Opalstack offers a relatively small number of data center locations compared to major cloud providers, which may result in higher latency for users targeting audiences in regions not well-served by the available server locations.
  • Fewer Managed Services and Add-ons
    Unlike larger hosting platforms, Opalstack lacks a wide range of managed add-on services such as built-in CDN integration, managed backups with granular restore options, or one-click SSL management that more mainstream providers offer out of the box.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Killed by Google
Opalstack

Overall verdict

  • If you are interested in keeping track of technology trends or are a frequent user of Google products, Killed by Google can be a valuable resource. It offers transparency about Google's decisions and serves as a historical archive.

Why this product is good

  • Killed by Google informs users about products and services that the company has discontinued. It provides insight into Google's product strategy and can help users understand the lifecycle of tech products.

Recommended for

  • Tech enthusiasts
  • Google product users
  • Historians and researchers focusing on technology
  • Consumers interested in understanding product lifecycles

Overall verdict

  • Opalstack is a solid choice for developers and tech-savvy users seeking an affordable, flexible control panel hosting solution with good performance and transparent pricing, though it may require more technical know-how than mainstream cPanel hosts.

Why this product is good

  • Uses a custom lightweight control panel that's fast and efficient compared to resource-heavy alternatives like cPanel
  • Offers straightforward, transparent pricing without hidden fees or aggressive upselling
  • Provides SSD storage and solid server performance for the price point
  • Supports multiple app types including Python, Node.js, and various frameworks beyond typical PHP hosting
  • Founded by the original creators of WebFaction, bringing significant hosting industry experience
  • Good for running multiple websites/apps under one account with granular resource control
  • Responsive customer support with a knowledgeable team
  • No long-term contracts required, allowing flexibility

Recommended for

  • Developers who need support for Python, Node.js, or other non-PHP applications
  • Users comfortable with a more technical, non-cPanel control panel interface
  • Small businesses or freelancers hosting multiple websites who want granular control
  • Former WebFaction users looking for a similar service after its shutdown
  • Budget-conscious users who want VPS-like flexibility without full server management
  • Users who prioritize transparent pricing over bundled marketing extras

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Killed by Google
Opalstack
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Killed by Google and Opalstack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Killed by Google 1245 mentions
Opalstack 0 mentions
  • The Gemini app is now available for Windows
    In case people don't know the Google Graveyard: https://killedbygoogle.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 1 day ago
  • AWS Acquires DuckDB
    > Amazon is probably the one that has the least regard for keeping technically interesting projects alive Well ... https://killedbygoogle.com/ Either way that news is awful. Europeans selling out to US corporations and then wondering why... - Source: Hacker News / 17 days ago
  • I'm switching my phone from Android to Linux
    That's fascinating. Meanwhile the google graveyard is growing almost daily: https://killedbygoogle.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

View more

Tracking Opalstack since Sep 2023.

Alternatives to Killed by Google and Opalstack

When comparing Killed by Google and Opalstack, you can also consider the following products.