Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Kanmail should be more popular than mlsql. It has been mentioned 4 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
 |
 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | kanmail.io | github.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | 2020 | — |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.
Kanmail turns your inbox into a kanban board. Drag emails between columns like To Do and Waiting, then clear them a column at a time. Works with any GMail/Outlook/IMAP account. Your mail never touches our servers. Open source. One-time purchase, no subscription.
No description of mlsql yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.
No features have been listed yet.
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
No analysis of Kanmail yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.
As answered by people managing Kanmail and mlsql.
Kanmail's answer
Kanmail transforms your email inbox into a kanban board, letting you drag and drop emails between columns to organize workflows visually. It combines all your email accounts (Gmail, Outlook, etc.) into one unified view while keeping your data private on your device. You pay once and own it forever with no subscriptions.
Kanmail's answer
Kanmail offers a visual kanban approach that helps you actually manage email as tasks rather than just reading messages in a list. Unlike competitors, it combines multiple accounts in custom workflow views while keeping all your data local and private. It's a one-time purchase with no subscription fees or cloud dependencies.
Kanmail's answer
Kanmail's primary audience includes professionals who manage multiple email accounts and need to organize emails as actionable tasks, such as salespeople tracking leads, customer support teams managing tickets, and power users who want efficient, keyboard-driven workflows. It appeals to privacy-conscious users who prefer local data storage and those frustrated with subscription-based email clients.
Share your experience with using Kanmail and mlsql. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.
I’ve gone through this process for my email client Kanmail [1]. The third party audit is not required for email clients that run on end users computers and store credentials locally. By the looks of it Pegasus falls into this... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
I’m building a desktop email client [0] that has $45 lifetime licenses. Made to scratch my own itch I’ve been using it as my only client for 4 years now, barely makes any money though! [0] https://kanmail.io. - Source: Hacker News / almost 5 years ago
I use pyinstaller for my Kanmail email client [1] and it’s fantastic, but at creating Mac app bundles or Windows exes. Tried making actual standalone binaries for another project and, as others have mentioned, they’re incredibly slow to... - Source: Hacker News / almost 5 years ago
I am working on a project that requires me to take user input (as English) and return SQL queries. We will eventually be working with multiple datasets, which is why the valuenet over at https://github.com/paulfitz/mlsql ended up being... Source: over 4 years ago
I found this great resource here: https://github.com/paulfitz/mlsql. Source: almost 5 years ago
When comparing Kanmail and mlsql, you can also consider the following products.
