
Julia
MATLAB
Python
GNU Octave
Rust
Wolfram Mathematica
Clojure
Scilab
Tiny C Compiler
GNU Compiler Collection
LLVM
clang
MinGW
Scoop
SSH of Windows' Linux subsystem
QBE
{"data_science" => "Data scientists who require a fast and flexible language for data manipulation and analysis.", "machine_learning" => "Developers looking to implement machine learning models that benefit from Julia's performance.", "numerical_analysis" => "Engineers and analysts conducting numerical analysis that demands high computational efficiency.", "scientific_computing" => "Researchers and scientists working on mathematical, statistical, and computational problems."}
No Tiny C Compiler videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Julia should be more popular than Tiny C Compiler. It has been mentiond 130 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
If you're looking for a language that aims to solve the "two-language problem" like Mojo, but want something more open, more mature and less influenced by VC funding, check out Julia: https://julialang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
The problem with MATLAB is that idiomatic MATLAB style (every operation returns a fresh matrix) can easily become very inefficient: it leads to countless heap memory allocations of new matrices, resulting in low data-access locality, i.e. Your data is needlessly copied around in slow DRAM all the time, rather than being kept in the fastest CPU cache. Julia's MATLAB-inspired syntax is at least as nice, but the... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
In this post, We will learn how to simulate MRI physics In the Julia programming language, a free and open source programming language That excels especially in scientific computing. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
Mine is Julia, although I don't use diary. Nowadays I like SuperCollider. https://julialang.org. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
> I was active in the Python community in the 200x timeframe, and I daresay the common consensus is that language didn't matter and a sufficiently smart compiler/JIT/whatever would eventually make dynamic scripting languages as fast as C, so there was no reason to learn static languages rather than just waiting for this to happen. To be very pedantic, the problem is not that these are dynamic languages _per se_,... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Some of those already exist, e.g. https://bellard.org/tcc/ However, they're not in widespread use. I would be curious to learn if there's any data/non-anecdotal information as to why. Is it momentum/inertia of GCC/LLVM/MSVC? Are alternative compilers incomplete and can't actually compile a lot of practical programs (belying the "relatively simple program") claim? Or is the performance differential due to... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
In theory you should be able to use TCC to build git currently [1] [2]. If you have a lightweight system or you're building something experimental, it's a lot easier to get TCC up and running over GCC. I note that it supports arm, arm64, i386, riscv64 and x86_64. [1] https://bellard.org/tcc/ [2] https://github.com/TinyCC/tinycc. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
> I'm not sure who wants to be able to syntax highlight C at 35 MB per second, but I am now able to do so Fast, but tcc *compiles* C to binary code at 29 MB/s on a really old computer: https://bellard.org/tcc/#speed. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
"Because Pnut can be distributed as a human-readable shell script (`pnut.sh`), it can serve as the basis for a reproducible build system. With a POSIX compliant shell, `pnut.sh` is sufficiently powerful to compile itself and, with some effort, [TCC](https://bellard.org/tcc/). Because TCC can be used to bootstrap GCC, this makes it possible to bootstrap a fully featured build toolchain from only human-readable... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
For what it's worth you can implement a C compiler in under 10kLOC. The chibi C compiler is only a few thousand lines [1]. There is also Cake [2] and the tiny C compiler [3] which are both relatively small. [1] https://github.com/rui314/chibicc [3] https://bellard.org/tcc/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
MATLAB - A high-level language and interactive environment for numerical computation, visualization, and programming
GNU Compiler Collection - The GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) is a compiler system produced by the GNU Project supporting...
Python - Python is a clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
LLVM - LLVM is a compiler infrastructure designed for compile-time, link-time, run-time, and...
GNU Octave - GNU Octave is a programming language for scientific computing.
clang - C, C++, Objective C and Objective C++ front-end for the LLVM compiler.