Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

JSLint VS CrossBrowserTesting

Compare JSLint VS CrossBrowserTesting and see what are their differences

Sugarbug
Connect your tools into a living knowledge graph. Sugarbug captures every signal to deliver compounding insights and unified context. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

JSLint logo JSLint

JSLint is a JavaScript program that looks for problems in JavaScript programs.

CrossBrowserTesting logo CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.
  • JSLint Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-13
  • CrossBrowserTesting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23

JSLint features and specs

  • Code Quality
    JSLint enforces a strict coding standard which helps maintain high code quality by identifying potential errors and problematic patterns.
  • Early Error Detection
    It provides early detection of bugs by checking for syntax errors and common coding mistakes before the code is executed.
  • Strict Enforcement
    JSLint adheres to strict coding guidelines which ensure that code remains consistent and readable, especially in larger teams or projects.
  • Education
    By highlighting questionable practices, JSLint serves as an educational tool for developers to improve their coding habits.
  • Configuration Simplicity
    JSLint has minimal configuration options, which simplifies the setup and ensures that the focus remains on code quality.

Possible disadvantages of JSLint

  • Rigid Rules
    JSLint is known for its inflexibility, imposing rigid rules that might not always align with modern JavaScript practices or individual project requirements.
  • Limited Customization
    There is limited scope for customization in JSLint, which can be frustrating for developers who prefer more control over the rules being enforced.
  • Deprecated Practices
    Some rules enforced by JSLint are considered outdated and may not accommodate modern JavaScript features like newer ECMAScript standards.
  • Learning Curve
    Beginners might find JSLint's strictness and cryptic error messages challenging, leading to a steeper learning curve compared to other linting tools.
  • Negative Developer Experience
    The strictness and sometimes seemingly arbitrary nature of its rules can lead to a frustrating developer experience for those who prefer a more flexible coding style.

CrossBrowserTesting features and specs

  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CrossBrowserTesting

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

Analysis of JSLint

Overall verdict

  • JSLint is a good tool for developers who appreciate strict code linting standards. It can help maintain consistent and clean code, although its stringent rules might not suit every project or coding style.

Why this product is good

  • History
    JSLint is one of the first JavaScript linters created, and its reputation has been solid over the years as a tool aimed at maintaining coding standards.
  • Simplicity
    It offers a straightforward approach by providing immediate feedback on potential errors and code smells.
  • Code quality
    JSLint is designed to identify problematic patterns in JavaScript code, helping to enforce coding best practices and improve code quality.

Recommended for

    {"teams" => "Development teams who need consistent coding standards across a project can benefit from JSLint’s strict conventions.", "projects" => "Projects that require high code quality and adherence to standards might find JSLint beneficial.", "beginner_developers" => "JSLint can help beginners learn good coding practices by highlighting problematic code patterns and suggesting improvements."}

Analysis of CrossBrowserTesting

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

JSLint videos

+ Add

JavaScript Chapter 4 - a look at jslint

CrossBrowserTesting videos

+ Add

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JSLint and CrossBrowserTesting)

JSLint

CrossBrowserTesting

Code Coverage
100 100%
Code Coverage
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
Website Testing
100% 100
Code Analysis
100 100%
Code Analysis
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
Browser Testing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using JSLint and CrossBrowserTesting. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

CrossBrowserTesting might be a bit more popular than JSLint. We know about 6 links to it since March 2021 and only 5 links to JSLint. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

JSLint mentions (5)

  • Should JavaScript be split into two languages? Google proposal divides opinion
    Absolutely - one for the great minds to play with while running in great circles and one that passes https://jslint.com and is allowed to be on the internet. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • JSLint error: Move all 'var' declarations to the top of the function
    UPDATE 8/22/2011: found http://jshint.com, it looks much better than http://jslint.com/. Source: over 4 years ago
  • Deltarune crash after editing chapter 1 language file
    Use https://jslint.com to find the unescaped quote or whatever that's invalidating the file. Remember to put quote marks in dialogue as \". Source: over 4 years ago
  • You shall never disrespect the ways of the elders
    Ooh! I'm pretty sure I actually know this one! I watched a bunch of Douglas Crockford talk's at Yahoo! Talking about the weirdness of the language he helped develop (such as this one). He also has built JSLint to help pull out code that runs but can have unexpected results. Booleans in JS evaluate if something is truthy or falsy and undefined is falsy (19:20), however a string of "undefined" would be truthy, and... Source: almost 5 years ago
  • Stupid simple problem in JS
    For future, just pop your code into an HTML Validator, a JS Linter, or a CSS Linter and it will check for basic stuff like this. There are also plugins in most IDEs for these kind of things which are incredibly useful. Source: over 5 years ago

CrossBrowserTesting mentions (6)

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a lot Https://www.howacarworks.com/ - how a car works Https://www.mcmaster.com/ - the UI here is so nice. Those illustrations Https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/ - how does a mechanical... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has built-in support for all major browsers, including Firefox, Edge, and Safari, all thanks to its integration with the W3C Webdriver API and Selenium. It also allows you to use... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    Crossbrowsertesting.com - Manual, Visual, and Selenium Browser Testing in the cloud - free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago
  • How do y’all test responsiveness of website?
    Professionally, I do basically the same for dev testing. We also have various devices on different platforms/versions in the office when needed, and our QA team primarily uses Cross Browser Testing Tool. If I need to check something specific, I usually use CBT. Source: over 5 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing JSLint and CrossBrowserTesting, you can also consider the following products

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

ESLint - The fully pluggable JavaScript code quality tool

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

Loading...