Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

JSIL VS Sciter

Compare JSIL VS Sciter and see what are their differences

JSIL logo JSIL

JSIL is an open source compiler that turns .NET applications, written in C# or VB.NET, into fast readable JavaScript.

Sciter logo Sciter

Embeddable HTML/CSS/script engine
  • JSIL Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-09
  • Sciter Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-11

JSIL features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Sciter features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Sciter's runtime is very small compared to other frameworks, making applications fast and efficient with low memory consumption.
  • Self-contained
    Sciter is a single DLL with no dependencies required. This simplifies deployment and reduces potential conflicts with other libraries.
  • Good performance
    The framework provides a balance between modern web technologies and high performance by utilizing native C++ code.
  • Cross-platform
    Sciter works on Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS, allowing developers to write applications that run on multiple platforms without additional effort.
  • Rich UI capabilities
    The framework allows the creation of complex and responsive user interfaces using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.
  • Offline applications
    Sciter does not require a web server as it can run entirely offline, which is beneficial for certain application types.
  • Active development and support
    Sciter is actively maintained and supported, with regular updates and a responsive support system available.

Possible disadvantages of Sciter

  • Limited community
    Sciter has a smaller community compared to more popular frameworks like Electron or Qt, making it harder to find resources or peer support.
  • Proprietary technology
    Sciter is not open-source, which might be a drawback for developers who prefer or require open-source solutions.
  • Documentation
    While improving, some developers may find Sciter's documentation less comprehensive compared to more established frameworks.
  • Learning curve
    Developers familiar with web development will have to adapt to Sciter's specific quirks and methods, which may have a learning curve.
  • Limited integration tools
    Sciter does not have as extensive a range of third-party tools and plugins as more popular frameworks, affecting integration with other systems.

Analysis of Sciter

Overall verdict

  • Sciter is generally considered a good option for developers who are looking for a lightweight and efficient way to build desktop applications with web technologies.

Why this product is good

  • Sciter offers several advantages including a small footprint, easy integration, and the ability to create cross-platform desktop applications using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It does not require a separate run-time installation, which simplifies deployment. Additionally, it supports modern web standards, ensuring that developers can utilize the latest web technologies in their applications. Its focus on performance makes it suitable for resource-constrained environments.

Recommended for

    Sciter is recommended for developers who need to build GUI applications that are cross-platform and want to leverage their web development skills. It's especially useful for those looking to create lightweight applications without the overhead of more extensive frameworks like Electron. It is also suitable for developers interested in rapid prototyping and creating custom UI/UX solutions.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JSIL and Sciter)
Development Tools
10 10%
90% 90
No Code
100 100%
0% 0
Rapid Application Development
Website Builder
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using JSIL and Sciter. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Sciter seems to be a lot more popular than JSIL. While we know about 71 links to Sciter, we've tracked only 2 mentions of JSIL. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

JSIL mentions (2)

  • .NET Blazor
    At the very end of the blogpost the author asks why not compile C# to JavaScript, like F# (Fable) does? The author thinks that would be the best solution overall, and is surprised it has not happened yet. In fact that has happened, see JSIL (http://jsil.org/, which compiles .NET bytecode to JS) and also SharpKit (https://github.com/SharpKit/SharpKit which is built... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • .NET Blazor
    There actually are several C# to JavaScript transpilers out there but none are well-maintained with a strong following (compared to Fable). Some examples are... https://github.com/theolivenbaum/h5 https://www.infoq.com/news/2015/02/duocode-csharp-javascript/ http://jsil.org I wonder if the community just isn't interested in this approach. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

Sciter mentions (71)

  • Show HN: Vaev โ€“ A browser engine built from scratch (It renders google.com)
    There is also https://sciter.com/ that the author tried to find finance to make it opensource but couldn't find enough supporters. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Servo in 2024: stats, features and donations
    > I'm convinced that using an embedded browser engine to render app UI is the future. Sciter exists: https://sciter.com/ And it indeed is great for UI. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Blitz: A lightweight, modular, extensible web renderer
    I think Sciter is probably the better comparison: https://sciter.com/ It is a ground-up implementation of HTML and CSS rendering. IIRC it used to have its own programming language but now uses JS. Iโ€™ve long been interested in this kind of thing but havenโ€™t actually played with Sciter in depth. Used to be that the licensing was a concern but looking at the site now it seems the terms have changed to be much more... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • So You Want to Build a Browser Engine
    Seems a good place to mention https://sciter.com/ It's been on HN loads of times. A "browser" engine but very narrow scope. Works a treat for LOB type apps. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Show HN: Dropflow, a CSS layout engine for node or <canvas>
    > wondering if css and svg could be used as abstraction over graphics and UI libraries There's another project called Sciter that uses CSS to target native graphics libraries: https://sciter.com > I wonder how hard it was to implement css. I've heard it can be pretty complex. It was hard, but the biggest barrier is the obscurity of the knowledge. Text layout is the hardest, because working with glyphs and... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing JSIL and Sciter, you can also consider the following products

ScaffoldHub - JavaScript full-stack application generator. You generate it and the code is yours.

Electron - Build cross platform desktop apps with web technologies

JSC - jsc can convert your C# Application to PHP, JavaScript, Actionscript, Java, C and C#

Flutter - Build beautiful native apps in record time ๐Ÿš€

Eto.Forms - Cross platform, .NET-based desktop and mobile user interface framework.

Ultralight - Fast, light HTML UI solution for C++ apps