
fzf
HTTPie
jello
fx
Bat
fd
cURL
jq is like sed for JSON data - you can use it to slice and filter and map and transform structured...

NovoPsych
Clinical assessment tools for psychologists, therapists and occupational therapists. Send measures by secure link and review scored results, severity bands and reports.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, jq seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 162 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | stedolan.github.io | clientforms.app |
| Pricing | ||
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of jq yet.
Clinical assessment tools for psychologists, therapists and occupational therapists. Send measures such as the PHQ-9, GAD-7 and DASS-21 by secure link and get scored results, severity bands and reports ready to review. The catalogue also includes DSM-5 ADHD assessments and autism screening tools....
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
JQ Racing THECar Black Edition - Velocity RC Cars Magazine Review
More videos
No ClientForms.app videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing jq and ClientForms.app.
ClientForms.app's answer:
Frontend: Next.js 15 (React 19), Tailwind CSS Backend: Supabase (PostgreSQL, Row-Level Security) Authentication: Clerk Payments: Stripe Hosting: Vercel (Sydney region) Database hosting: Supabase (Australian data residency)
ClientForms.app's answer:
Psychologists who assess ADHD and autism. Typically private practice, solo or small group (1-5 clinicians), currently using paper forms and spending hours on admin per assessment. They want something that works and is secure.
ClientForms.app's answer:
Neurodivergent-first design. Most digital forms just replicate paper online. ClientForms is built specifically for ADHD and autism patients - progress bars with time remaining (helps with time blindness), softer colours instead of harsh white, sticky headers so you always know where you are. The forms are designed to reduce anxiety and improve completion rates.
ClientForms.app's answer:
Most clinical software treats patients as an afterthought. ClientForms is designed specifically for neurodivergent users who are filling out the forms, progress indicators, time estimates, calmer colours, predictable layouts. One link, no signup required, works on any device. Patients just open and complete.
Share your experience with using jq and ClientForms.app. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Therefore, if I have to choose one right now, I would probably go for Mustache, and a JSON processor such as jq as a glue if needed. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
I am lazy person, so I worked harder and wrote a small jq script to generate a list of rules to go into the select key in ruff.lint section:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
"jq is a lightweight and flexible command-line JSON processor" from the jq https://stedolan.github.io/jq/. - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago
Tracking ClientForms.app since Dec 2025.
When comparing jq and ClientForms.app, you can also consider the following products.


NovoPsych is a tool that is used for outcome monitoring via conducting psychological tests online.
Compare NovoPsych to jq or ClientForms.app:

CLI HTTP that will make you smile. JSON support, syntax highlighting, wget-like downloads, extensions, and more.
Compare HTTPie to jq or ClientForms.app:

jello is a command line tool that filters JSON data using pure python syntax.
Compare jello to jq or ClientForms.app:

