Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Jotti VS Fig Scripts

Compare Jotti VS Fig Scripts and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Jotti logo Jotti

Jottis malware scan is a free online service that enables you to scan suspicious files with several...
Build internal CLI tools, really fast
  • Jotti Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-01
  • Fig Scripts Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-08

Jotti features and specs

  • Multiple Antivirus Engines
    Jotti uses multiple antivirus engines to scan files, increasing the likelihood of detection for various malware by leveraging different heuristics and databases.
  • Free Service
    The service is available for free, allowing users to scan files without incurring any costs.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Jotti provides a straightforward and easy-to-use interface, making it accessible for most users.
  • No Installation Required
    As an online tool, it doesn't require any software installation, making it convenient for users concerned about downloading additional applications.

Possible disadvantages of Jotti

  • File Size Limitations
    Jotti has a limitation on the size of files that can be uploaded, which may be restrictive for users needing to scan larger files.
  • Limited to Single Files
    Users can only scan one file at a time, which can be time-consuming if there are multiple files to check.
  • Potential Privacy Concerns
    Since files are uploaded to an online server for scanning, there could be privacy and confidentiality concerns depending on the nature of the data.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    Being an online service, Jotti requires a stable internet connection, which may be a limitation in areas with poor connectivity.

Fig Scripts features and specs

  • Pre-built automation scripts
    Fig Scripts provides a library of pre-built scripts that help developers automate common tasks, saving significant time on repetitive terminal workflows without needing to write scripts from scratch.
  • Easy integration with the terminal
    Fig Scripts integrates seamlessly with the terminal environment, allowing users to run and manage scripts directly within their existing workflow without needing to switch between tools or interfaces.
  • Community-driven collection
    The scripts are community-driven, meaning developers can benefit from the collective knowledge and contributions of other developers, gaining access to a diverse range of useful automation solutions.
  • Customizable and extensible
    Users can modify existing scripts or create their own to fit specific use cases, making the tool flexible enough to accommodate a wide variety of development workflows and personal preferences.
  • Developer-focused design
    Fig Scripts is built specifically for developers, so the scripts and tooling are tailored to common development tasks like Git operations, environment setup, deployment, and other engineering-centric workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Fig Scripts

  • Limited platform support
    Fig was historically focused on macOS, which limited its availability to developers working on Linux or Windows platforms, reducing its appeal for cross-platform teams.
  • Dependency on Fig ecosystem
    Using Fig Scripts often requires having the broader Fig (now acquired by AWS and rebranded) tooling installed, creating a dependency on an external ecosystem that may change or be discontinued.
  • Uncertain future after acquisition
    After Fig was acquired by Amazon and integrated into AWS, the future direction and continued support of Fig Scripts became uncertain, raising concerns about long-term reliability for users who depend on it.
  • Limited script discoverability
    Finding the right script for a specific use case can be challenging, as the library may not be as well-organized or searchable as more mature package managers or script repositories.
  • Learning curve for customization
    While pre-built scripts are easy to use, customizing or creating new scripts requires understanding Fig's specific configuration format and conventions, which adds a learning curve beyond standard shell scripting.

Analysis of Fig Scripts

Overall verdict

  • Fig Scripts, part of the Fig platform, was a well-regarded tool for terminal autocomplete and productivity, though it's important to note that Fig was acquired by AWS in 2023 and its standalone product was eventually sunset, with much of its technology being integrated into Amazon Q Developer (formerly CodeWhisperer/CLI). If you're referring to the legacy Fig tool, it was generally well-liked for its user-friendly approach to terminal enhancement.

Why this product is good

  • Provided IDE-style autocomplete for hundreds of CLI tools directly in the terminal
  • Easy to install and integrated seamlessly with existing shell environments like bash, zsh, and fish
  • Offered a visual, intuitive interface for command discovery without needing to leave the terminal
  • Supported scripting and customization for teams to build their own autocomplete specs
  • Had a strong open-source community contributing autocomplete definitions for various tools

Recommended for

  • Developers who spend significant time in the terminal and want to reduce typing errors
  • Teams looking to standardize CLI usage with custom autocomplete scripts
  • New developers learning complex CLI tools who benefit from visual command suggestions
  • Users who prioritize terminal productivity and efficiency
  • Those already using AWS tools who might now prefer transitioning to Amazon Q Developer for similar functionality

Jotti videos

Jotti Malware Scan

Fig Scripts videos

No Fig Scripts videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Jotti and Fig Scripts)
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100
Security & Privacy
100 100%
0% 0
Web Icons
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Jotti and Fig Scripts. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Jotti seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Jotti mentions (13)

  • Might have gotten a virus from Dodi repacks.
    Everyone of you "pirates" should be using a image of your hard-drive to restore from. This should have been done after your windows installation, updates, drivers, OS tweaks, etc. You use the free version of Macrium Reflect, you use the "make a boot thumb drive" option with the software and it will automatically partition the USB drive for you and on the non-boot partition, you stick the image. Anytime you think... Source: over 3 years ago
  • How to not get a computer virus?
    Anything you execute, including installers, run through VirusTotal, Jotti AntiVirus, or my personal favorite: ShieldPro. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Areowitter V3.0, false positives? What do you think?
    Just scanned the apk on https://virusscan.jotti.org which also uses Ikarus and says that it's fine. Only Fortinet gives the same result. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Virus detected in official bg.battletech site docs - Google shows as "unsafe" to download - McAfee detects virus
    Let me give you a pro tip from guys doing netsec since the 90s: Get rid of 3rd party AV and use https://virusscan.jotti.org/ for suspicious downloads. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Is there a site that I can upload files for virus scan?
    There is also https://virusscan.jotti.org/ but virustotal is the largest one and communicates with the companies whose scanners they use to report new threats. Source: over 4 years ago
View more

Fig Scripts mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Fig Scripts yet. Tracking of Fig Scripts recommendations started around Feb 2023.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Jotti and Fig Scripts, you can also consider the following products

VirusTotal - VirusTotal is a free service that analyzes suspicious files and URLs and facilitates the quick...

Icons8 - Free app for Mac & Windows already containing 39,800 icons. Allows to search and import iconsโ€ฆ

Metadefender - Metadefender, by OPSWAT, allows you to quickly multi-scan your files for malware using 43 antivirus...

Hybrid-Analysis.com - Hybrid-Analysis.com is a free malware analysis service powered by payload-security.com.

URLscan.io - urlscan.io is a free service to scan and analyse websites. When a URL is submitted to urlscan.io, an automated process will browse to the URL like a regular user and record the activity that this page navigation creates.

Any.Run - ANY.RUN is an online interactive sandbox for DFIR/SOC investigations. The service gives access to fast malware analysis and detection of cybersecurity threats.