Software Alternatives & Startups

join.me VS Apache ActiveMQ

Compare join.me VS Apache ActiveMQ and see what are their differences

join.me

Instant screen sharing. Instant Aha!

Rating
0 reviews
Apache ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, join.me should be more popular than Apache ActiveMQ. It has been mentioned 15 times since March 2021.

social mentions
15 vs 7
Communication popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 99

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

join.me
Apache ActiveMQ
Website join.me activemq.apache.org
Pricing
Open source
Company Startup from the United States —
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

join.me 5 features
Apache ActiveMQ 6 features
  • Ease of Use
    Join.me has an intuitive user interface that allows users to quickly set up and join meetings without extensive technical knowledge.
  • Screen Sharing
    The platform offers robust screen sharing capabilities, making it easy for presenters to share their screen with participants in real-time.
  • No Downloads Required
    Users can join a meeting directly through their web browser without needing to download any software, enhancing its accessibility.
  • Mobile Accessibility
    Join.me supports mobile devices, allowing users to participate in meetings on-the-go through their smartphones or tablets.
  • Customizable URLs
    The service allows for personalized meeting URLs, making it easier for participants to remember and join meetings.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Free Plan
    The free version of Join.me has limited features, especially in comparison to competitors, which may not be sufficient for more extensive business needs.
  • Video Quality
    Some users have reported that the video quality is not as high as other competing platforms, which can affect the overall meeting experience.
  • Security Concerns
    Join.me has faced criticism over its security and privacy measures, which might be a significant concern for businesses handling sensitive information.
  • Advanced Features Require Subscription
    Many of the advanced features like recording, scheduling, and management tools are locked behind a paywall, requiring a subscription.
  • Integration Limitations
    Compared to some other platforms, Join.me offers fewer integrations with other business tools and applications, which might limit its functionality for some users.
  • Open Source
    ActiveMQ is open-source under the Apache License, making it free to use and modify. This can lead to cost savings compared to commercial solutions.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    ActiveMQ supports multiple messaging protocols, including AMQP, MQTT, OpenWire, Stomp, and others, allowing for flexible integration with various systems and applications.
  • Java Integration
    Written in Java, ActiveMQ integrates well with JVM-based applications and other Apache projects like Camel and Karaf, making it a good fit for Java-centric environments.
  • High Availability
    Features like broker clustering, network of brokers, and failover support provide robust high availability options, ensuring message delivery even in case of failures.
  • Performance and Scalability
    ActiveMQ can handle a large number of messages and users by scaling horizontally, making it suitable for both small and enterprise-level applications.
  • Admin Console
    ActiveMQ provides a web-based admin console for easy management and monitoring of the message broker, simplifying administrative tasks.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Configuration
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for newcomers. It often requires a steep learning curve to understand all the available options and optimizations.
  • Resource Intensive
    ActiveMQ can be resource-intensive, particularly in high-throughput scenarios, which may necessitate more robust hardware for optimal performance.
  • Latency
    In certain configurations, ActiveMQ may exhibit higher latency compared to other brokers, which might not make it suitable for use cases requiring real-time guarantees.
  • Java Dependency
    As a Java-based solution, ActiveMQ requires the JVM, which can be a downside for organizations that have standardized on other technology stacks.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around ActiveMQ, it may not be as large or as active as those for other, similar open-source projects. This can lead to slower responses to issues and fewer community-based resources.
  • Documentation
    Though comprehensive, the documentation can sometimes be difficult to navigate, making it challenging for users to find specific information quickly.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

join.me
Apache ActiveMQ

Overall verdict

  • While join.me was once an excellent option for quick and easy virtual meetings, it's important to note that the platform has undergone changes over the years. As of October 2020, the features of join.me were integrated into the GoTo portfolio, which may have affected its availability and functionality. Prospective users should consider current alternatives within and beyond the GoTo suite that may offer similar simplicity and features.

Why this product is good

  • Join.me was a popular screen sharing and online meeting platform known for its simplicity and ease of use. It allowed users to easily host and join meetings, share screens, and collaborate in real-time without requiring extensive software installation. Its simple interface and ability to support a variety of devices made it a convenient choice for users who needed straightforward and spontaneous meetings.

Recommended for

    Join.me was particularly recommended for small businesses, freelancers, or individuals needing a user-friendly platform for impromptu meetings and screen sharing without complicated setup processes. It's best suited for scenarios where ease of use and accessibility are prioritized over advanced features.

Overall verdict

  • Apache ActiveMQ is generally considered a good choice for message brokering due to its comprehensive feature set, stability, and scalability. It is especially beneficial in environments where integration between different systems and technologies is necessary, thanks to its support of numerous messaging protocols.

Why this product is good

  • Apache ActiveMQ is a popular open-source message broker that is known for its flexibility and reliability. It supports multiple messaging protocols and offers features such as high availability, load balancing, and a robust set of messaging patterns. It is a mature project with a large user base and a supportive community. Its ability to integrate with various platforms and languages, along with its rich feature set, makes it a suitable choice for many applications requiring reliable message queuing.

Recommended for

    Apache ActiveMQ is recommended for enterprises looking for a reliable and scalable message broker, developers needing rich messaging functionality, and organizations that require robust support for various messaging protocols, including JMS, AMQP, STOMP, and MQTT. It is particularly well-suited for applications that need to distribute messages between different applications, languages, and platforms.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

join.me 3 videos + Add
Apache ActiveMQ 0 videos + Add

Join.me Review | Next Best Conference Calling Software | Pearl Lemon Reviews

More videos

  • - Using Join.me (Free)
  • - Join.Me - Free ScreenSharing Service Tutorial

No Apache ActiveMQ videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
join.me
Apache ActiveMQ
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using join.me and Apache ActiveMQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

join.me no reviews yet
Apache ActiveMQ no reviews yet

View more

  • 6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
    hevodata.com · Jan 2022

    ActiveMQ is a flexible, open-source, multi-protocol messaging broker that supports many protocols. This makes it easy for developers to use a variety of languages and platforms. The AMQP protocol facilitates...

  • Top 15 Alternatives to RabbitMQ In 2021
    gokicker.com · Jan 2022

    It is a managed information broker for Apache ActiveMQ which has simple installation and it runs message broker in cloud. It doesn’t need any special look after regular management and maintenance of the message...

  • Top 15 Kafka Alternatives Popular In 2021
    www.spec-india.com · Sep 2021

    Apache ActiveMQ is a popular, open-source, flexible multi-protocol messaging broker. Since it has great support for industry-based protocols, developers get access to languages and platforms. It helps in connecting...

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

join.me 15 mentions
Apache ActiveMQ 7 mentions
  • Is getting a .website domain a good idea for my business?
    Agreed. A good example of a good use is join.me. This makes sense but even so, do you know how many times I've had people type join.me.com even after I say its just join.me? A lot. Source: over 3 years ago
  • finding a screen recorder / screen share program that gives 5 minute warming that video will end
    I'm doing a little investigative work... While I was giving a personal training using my screen sharing program join.me, the participant had a voice come over his computer. The computer generated voice said 'this video will end in 5... Source: over 3 years ago
  • Anyone got extra users on their accouts?
    Why don't you have him share his screen with you? You can use something simple like teams in office or join.me so you can see his screen on your screen. Source: over 4 years ago

View more

  • Why Kafka? A Developer-Friendly Guide to Event-Driven Architecture
    Before Kafka, traditional message queues like RabbitMQ and ActiveMQ were widely used, but they had limitations in handling massive, high-throughput real-time data streams. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Hosting Services – The Short and Mid-Term Solution Before Transition to the Public Cloud
    Consume open-source queuing services – customers can deploy message brokers such as ActiveMQ or RabbitMQ, to develop asynchronous applications, and when moving to the public cloud, use the cloud providers managed services alternatives. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Top 6 message queues for distributed architectures
    Apache ActiveMQ is an open-source Java-based message queue that can be accessed by clients written in Javascript, C, C++, Python and .NET. There are two versions of ActiveMQ, the existing “classic” version and the next generation... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

View more

Alternatives to join.me and Apache ActiveMQ

When comparing join.me and Apache ActiveMQ, you can also consider the following products.