
jquery-template
NANO – jQuery Template Engine
Pug
Eta JS
Handlebars
Typescript
Nunjucks
Jinja2 is a template engine written in Python.

Create blank files, custom file types, templates, whole batches, and reusable folder setups exactly where you are working on macOS.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Jinja2 seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 4 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | jinja.pocoo.org | createfilesplus.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Jinja2 yet.
CreateFiles+ adds the file creation workflow macOS should have had all along. Create a new file exactly where you are working, without opening TextEdit, saving-as, using Terminal, or dragging template files around. Use Finder right-click menus where macOS allows them, or fall back to the Finder...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Jinja2 yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Python and Jinja2 Cisco Network Automation
More videos
CreateFiles+ Demo
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Jinja2 and CreateFiles+.
CreateFiles+'s answer:
Xcode and Swift
CreateFiles+'s answer:
macOS should have created this feature out of the box but does not exist. Windows users have had this feature for over a decade. I created this to remove that gap for macOS users.
CreateFiles+'s answer:
I am not familiar with any competitors doing this today.
CreateFiles+'s answer:
Power Users, Developers, Productivity focused users, students, teachers, creators.
CreateFiles+'s answer:
Its brand new so that is yet to be determined.
CreateFiles+'s answer:
I have struggled with not having this capability in Finder for years and decided I would fix the problem for me and then see if other users would want the same solution.
Share your experience with using Jinja2 and CreateFiles+. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


I have a list say list[a][b] of length 10.I want to print from list[0][b] to list[10][b] and use it in jinja2 template. Source: over 4 years ago
I am using Flask with Jinja2 as templating language. Source: over 4 years ago
I'm trying to issue a POST request within a Jinja template in Flask. However, parameters are passed in via GET by default, and this particular method only accepts POST requests. Source: over 4 years ago
Tracking CreateFiles+ since Jun 2026.
When comparing Jinja2 and CreateFiles+, you can also consider the following products.

A template plugin for jQuery. Allows templating without cluttering JavaScript code with markup.
Compare jquery-template to Jinja2 or CreateFiles+:

NANO is a simple and open-source jQuery Template Engine developed by trix.pl and released under the MIT License.
Compare NANO – jQuery Template Engine to Jinja2 or CreateFiles+:

Pug is a robust, elegant, feature rich template engine for Node.js
Compare Pug to Jinja2 or CreateFiles+:
Application and Data, Languages & Frameworks, and Templating Languages & Extensions
Compare Eta JS to Jinja2 or CreateFiles+:

Handlebars is a JavaScript template library that is, more or less, based on ...
Compare Handlebars to Jinja2 or CreateFiles+:

TypeScript allows developers to compile a superset of JavaScript to plain JavaScript on any browser, host, or operating system.
Compare Typescript to Jinja2 or CreateFiles+: