Jet Admin VS pkgsrc
Compare Jet Admin VS pkgsrc and see what are their differences
Shared cloud environments for AI coding agents. Run Claude Code, Cursor CLI, Codex, and Gemini CLI from any device, API, or automation tool.
sponsored
Jet Admin
Retool
Appsmith
Forest Admin
Budibase
Motor Admin
ToolJet
Softr
pkgsrc
Conda
Homebrew
Yay
Portage
Nix
Docker
BBEdit
Build custom business apps such as internal tools or client portals incredibly fast and without code. Use drag-and-drop UI components to assemble complex multi-page apps on top of any data source.
Jet Admin pkgsrcJet Admin is recommended for startups, SMEs, and large enterprises that need to build customized admin dashboards and internal tools quickly and without extensive coding knowledge. It is particularly beneficial for companies with diverse data sources and workflow automation needs.
Based on our record, pkgsrc should be more popular than Jet Admin. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I don't want to go the expense and setup of a managed database service. I like the concept of using sqlite3, litestream, and AWS S3 for an Internal App. I found an Internal Tools vendor Jetadmin (jetadmin.io) that lists Sqlite as a supported database. It may be that Sqlite is easily integrated with the other tools I looked at, but they don't state it. Source: almost 4 years ago
Jetadmin.io - Firestore integration is not working well. Source: over 5 years ago
Had a look at the github and subsequently the demo, I end up at jetadmin.io which by the looks of it is an interesting low-code/no-code environment. However if you use django-jet doesn't that mean you need a jetadmin account? Source: over 5 years ago
> Most open source software packages are also compiled for BSD variants, they switched to 64 bit time_t a long time ago and reported back upstream any problems. * NetBSD in 2012: https://www.netbsd.org/releases/formal-6/NetBSD-6.0.html * OpenBSD in 2014: http://www.openbsd.org/55.html For packaging, NetBSD uses their (multi-platform) Pkgsrc, which has 29,000 packages, which probably covers a large swath of... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
> https://pkgsrc.smartos.org/install-on-macos/ Note that Pkgsrc is a NetBSD-derived project. * https://pkgsrc.org The Joyent folks leveraged it to allow their customers, who were perhaps not as familiar with Solaris/SmartOS, a larger pool of packages. Pkgsrc was running on Solaris before Joyent, Joyent built on top of it. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Https://pkgsrc.org/ from netbsd runs on many systems. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
It seems according to pkgsrc.org that pkgin might follow the PKG_PATH environment variable. You're supposed to set PKG_PATH="http://cdn.NetBSD.org/pub/pkgsrc/packages/NetBSD/$(uname -p)/$(uname -r|cut -f '1 2' -d.)/All/", and according to uname(1), -p gives the processor architecture and -r gives the operating system [kernel] release. Source: over 3 years ago
It seems like pkgsrc.org hasnโt got the news yet. Source: over 3 years ago
Retool - Build custom internal tools in minutes.
Conda - Binary package manager with support for environments.
Appsmith - Appsmith is an open source web framework for building internal tools, admin panels, dashboards, and workflows.
Homebrew - The missing package manager for macOS
Forest Admin - Execute fast and at scale with no time wasted on internal tools developed in-house.
Yay - Yay is an AUR helper written in go, based on the design of yaourt, apacman and pacaur.