Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Jekyll VS StackStats.app

Compare Jekyll VS StackStats.app and see what are their differences

Jekyll

Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
To be Vibe Voted
Alternatives Is it good?
StackStats.app

Advanced analytics for Substack writers. Runs 100% locally, no cloud, no subscription. Discover your superfans, churn risk, and cohort retention.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid $39 / Annually (1 Year License)
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
Grapple
Do-It-Yourself Data Analytics & Business Intelligence, Powered by AI sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Jekyll seems to be a lot more popular than StackStats.app. While we know about 204 links to Jekyll, we've tracked only 1 mention of StackStats.app.

social mentions
204 vs 1
CMS popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 2

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Jekyll
StackStats.app
Website jekyllrb.com stackstats.app
Pricing
Open source
Paid $39 / Annually (1 Year License) Official pricing
Company Startup from the United States Startup from the United Arab Emirates · 1 - 9 employees · 2026
Listed in
CMS Blogging Blogging Platform Static Site Generators +1
Data Analysis And Visualization Data Analytics Web Analytics

About Jekyll and StackStats.app

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Jekyll
StackStats.app

No description of Jekyll yet.

StackStats is a local desktop app for serious Substack writers. Import your CSV exports and get analytics Substack doesn't show you: bot-filtered open rates, cohort retention, dead subscriber detection, superfan ID, content-to-growth correlation, and an optional AI layer (supports Ollama,...

Read more about StackStats.app

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Jekyll 5 features
StackStats.app 6 features
  • Speed and Performance
    Jekyll generates static websites, which means they load faster compared to dynamic websites. No database queries are required, reducing server overhead and improving performance.
  • Security
    Static sites have a smaller attack surface compared to dynamic sites because they don't rely on databases or server-side code. This means fewer vectors for potential compromises.
  • Simplicity
    Jekyll setups are relatively straightforward, especially if you are comfortable writing in Markdown and HTML. This can make it easier to manage and maintain your website.
  • Integration with GitHub Pages
    Jekyll is designed to work seamlessly with GitHub Pages, allowing you to host your website for free with automatic deployment directly from your GitHub repository.
  • Customizability
    Jekyll allows for extensive customization through its support for plugins, themes, and templates. This can be helpful to create a unique look and functionality for your website.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    While Jekyll is simpler than some other static site generators, it does require some familiarity with the command line, version control (Git), and YAML configuration.
  • Build Time
    For large websites, the build times can become lengthy, which can slow down the development process, especially if you are making frequent updates.
  • Lack of Real-time Content Updates
    Since Jekyll generates static sites, real-time content updates (e.g., comments, dynamic forms) aren't natively supported and require third-party services or additional tooling.
  • Dependence on Ruby
    Jekyll is built with Ruby, so you will need to have Ruby installed and occasionally deal with Ruby-specific issues. This might be a drawback for developers who are not familiar with the Ruby ecosystem.
  • Limited Built-in Functionality
    While Jekyll is very flexible, it doesn’t have built-in support for many features out of the box, which might require you to manually implement or rely on plugins.
  • Platforms
    Mac, Windows
  • Pricing
    One-time
  • Data storage
    Local Only
  • Internet Required
    No
  • Account Required
    No
  • AI integration
    Yes (optional)

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Jekyll
StackStats.app

Overall verdict

  • Jekyll is a good choice for individuals and organizations looking for a straightforward, reliable, and efficient way to build static websites. Its strengths include simplicity, flexibility, and strong community support, which contribute to a smooth development experience.

Why this product is good

  • Jekyll is a popular static site generator that is widely appreciated for its simplicity, speed, and ease of use. It is particularly suited for creating blogs and simple websites, leveraging Markdown and Liquid templates to generate static HTML content. Its integration with GitHub Pages also makes it a convenient choice for developers and non-developers alike who want to host their sites directly from their GitHub repositories without additional setup or cost.

Recommended for

  • Bloggers and content creators looking for a simple way to publish content online.
  • Developers who prefer writing in Markdown and managing content with a version control system.
  • Users who want to host their sites for free using GitHub Pages.
  • Anyone in need of a static site generator that is easy to set up, customize, and maintain with minimal resources.

Overall verdict

  • StackStats.app appears to be a niche analytics/tracking tool, but without verified hands-on data or extensive user reviews available, a definitive quality judgment can't be fully confirmed—prospective users should test the free tier or trial before committing.

Why this product is good

  • Likely offers a focused, lightweight dashboard for tracking specific stats without the bloat of larger platforms
  • May provide simple setup and integration compared to more complex enterprise analytics tools
  • Could offer competitive pricing for smaller teams or solo users compared to established competitors
  • Potentially built with a modern tech stack for faster performance and cleaner UI

Recommended for

  • Indie developers or solopreneurs needing simple stat tracking
  • Small teams looking for an affordable alternative to larger analytics suites
  • Users who prioritize simplicity and minimal setup over advanced feature sets
  • Those willing to test a newer or less-established tool in exchange for potentially lower cost or more tailored functionality

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Jekyll 1 video + Add
StackStats.app 0 videos + Add

Getting Started With Jekyll, The Static Site Generator

No StackStats.app videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Jekyll
StackStats.app
100% 100%
CMS
0% 0%
0% 0%
Data Analysis And Visualization
100% 100%
100% 100%
Blogging
0% 0%
0% 0%
Data Analytics
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Jekyll and StackStats.app.

What's the story behind your product?

StackStats.app's answer:

I built StackStats because Substack's native analytics weren't cutting it. I wanted cohort data, real open rates (not bot-inflated), and a way to identify which posts were actually driving subscriber growth — but every tool I found was either cloud-based or required migrating off Substack entirely. So I built a local app that works with Substack's own CSV exports. No migration, no cloud, no subscription.

What makes your product unique?

StackStats.app's answer:

StackStats runs 100% locally on your machine — your subscriber data never touches a server. It also goes far beyond what Substack shows natively: bot-filtered open rates, cohort retention, superfan identification, dead subscriber detection, and content-to-growth correlation. No subscription, no account, no cloud. Pay once, own it forever.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

StackStats.app's answer:

Most newsletter analytics tools are cloud-based SaaS with monthly subscriptions. StackStats is a one-time purchase that runs entirely on your device. For Substack writers who care about privacy — especially those with paid subscribers — that's a meaningful difference. You also get analytics features that don't exist anywhere else, like bot-filtered open rates and cohort retention, without having to migrate away from Substack.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

StackStats.app's answer:

Serious Substack writers who are frustrated by Substack's shallow native analytics and want real data to drive growth — without moving their subscriber data to the cloud.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

StackStats.app's answer:

Electron (macOS + Windows), HTML/CSS/JavaScript, Chart.js, PapaParse. Optional AI layer supports Ollama, Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, Groq, and OpenRouter. Licensing via Cloudflare Workers + D1. Payments via Gumroad.

User comments

Share your experience with using Jekyll and StackStats.app. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Jekyll no reviews yet
StackStats.app no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of StackStats.app yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Jekyll 204 mentions
StackStats.app 1 mention
  • Managing private data from the web securely on AWS
    My bookmarks have been public since 1998, and the previous version, bookmarks-v3.0, was a static site generated by Jekyll and published on GitHub Pages: it cost nothing, and for a list of public links it was good enough. The criterion... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Setting up a hugo static site hosted with Porkbun
    This is a static site generated with hugo with the PaperMod theme. I wanted an easy to use static site generator. I considered Jekyll And believe it to be a good choice for static sites. There seemed to be slightly more themes I liked... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • So, you want to vibecode a linkblog?
    First of all, I modified my publishing programs to keep a (local) copy of each link published modulePublicationCache and then I thought about using it for my linkblog. I like very much jekyll for a blog and I requested to some AIs... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago

View more

  • Ask HN: What are you working on? (November 2026)
    I'm working on 3 products now: 1. FormBeep(https://formbeep.com) at $38 MRR now - A form to Whatsapp tool. Stack is mainly CF workers with Clerk Auth. 2. SlashLink(https://slashlink.app) $0 - A simple pay as you go amazon link localizer.... - Source: Hacker News / 3 days ago

Alternatives to Jekyll and StackStats.app

When comparing Jekyll and StackStats.app, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...