Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Jekyll VS CreateFiles+

Compare Jekyll VS CreateFiles+ and see what are their differences

Jekyll

Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
CreateFiles+

Create blank files, custom file types, templates, whole batches, and reusable folder setups exactly where you are working on macOS.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid Free trial $4.99 / One-off (2 mac licenses with purchase)
Alternatives Is it good?
Grapple
Do-It-Yourself Data Analytics & Business Intelligence, Powered by AI sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Jekyll seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 204 times since March 2021.

social mentions
204 vs 0
CMS popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Jekyll
CreateFiles+
Website jekyllrb.com createfilesplus.com
Pricing
Open source
Paid Free trial $4.99 / One-off (2 mac licenses with purchase) Official pricing
Platforms —
MacOS Mac OSX Mac
Company Startup from the United States Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026
Listed in
CMS Blogging Blogging Platform Static Site Generators +1
Mac Tools File Management Productivity Developer Tools OS & Utilities +2

About Jekyll and CreateFiles+

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Jekyll
CreateFiles+

No description of Jekyll yet.

CreateFiles+ adds the file creation workflow macOS should have had all along. Create a new file exactly where you are working, without opening TextEdit, saving-as, using Terminal, or dragging template files around. Use Finder right-click menus where macOS allows them, or fall back to the Finder...

Read more about CreateFiles+

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Jekyll 5 features
CreateFiles+ 4 features
  • Speed and Performance
    Jekyll generates static websites, which means they load faster compared to dynamic websites. No database queries are required, reducing server overhead and improving performance.
  • Security
    Static sites have a smaller attack surface compared to dynamic sites because they don't rely on databases or server-side code. This means fewer vectors for potential compromises.
  • Simplicity
    Jekyll setups are relatively straightforward, especially if you are comfortable writing in Markdown and HTML. This can make it easier to manage and maintain your website.
  • Integration with GitHub Pages
    Jekyll is designed to work seamlessly with GitHub Pages, allowing you to host your website for free with automatic deployment directly from your GitHub repository.
  • Customizability
    Jekyll allows for extensive customization through its support for plugins, themes, and templates. This can be helpful to create a unique look and functionality for your website.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    While Jekyll is simpler than some other static site generators, it does require some familiarity with the command line, version control (Git), and YAML configuration.
  • Build Time
    For large websites, the build times can become lengthy, which can slow down the development process, especially if you are making frequent updates.
  • Lack of Real-time Content Updates
    Since Jekyll generates static sites, real-time content updates (e.g., comments, dynamic forms) aren't natively supported and require third-party services or additional tooling.
  • Dependence on Ruby
    Jekyll is built with Ruby, so you will need to have Ruby installed and occasionally deal with Ruby-specific issues. This might be a drawback for developers who are not familiar with the Ruby ecosystem.
  • Limited Built-in Functionality
    While Jekyll is very flexible, it doesn’t have built-in support for many features out of the box, which might require you to manually implement or rely on plugins.
  • Right-click on Finder
    Today finder does not let you create new files just folders. Our tool allows that in the Menu bar, Finder Menu, and in the body of any folder in macOS.
  • Quick file creation
    using the Flywheel to create new file types
  • Creating batch files
    Allows to create new files in batches up to 100 at a time
  • Folder packs
    Come with the app for different use cases and professions allowing the user to create commonly file types.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Jekyll
CreateFiles+

Overall verdict

  • Jekyll is a good choice for individuals and organizations looking for a straightforward, reliable, and efficient way to build static websites. Its strengths include simplicity, flexibility, and strong community support, which contribute to a smooth development experience.

Why this product is good

  • Jekyll is a popular static site generator that is widely appreciated for its simplicity, speed, and ease of use. It is particularly suited for creating blogs and simple websites, leveraging Markdown and Liquid templates to generate static HTML content. Its integration with GitHub Pages also makes it a convenient choice for developers and non-developers alike who want to host their sites directly from their GitHub repositories without additional setup or cost.

Recommended for

  • Bloggers and content creators looking for a simple way to publish content online.
  • Developers who prefer writing in Markdown and managing content with a version control system.
  • Users who want to host their sites for free using GitHub Pages.
  • Anyone in need of a static site generator that is easy to set up, customize, and maintain with minimal resources.

Overall verdict

  • I don't have verified information about CreateFiles+ (createfilesplus.com), as I don't have reliable data on this specific product or service to assess its quality, features, or reputation.

Why this product is good

  • Unable to confirm the legitimacy, functionality, or user reviews of this specific website or tool
  • No verified data available on pricing, features, or customer satisfaction
  • Recommend researching independently through reviews, user forums, and checking domain history before use
  • Consider checking for security certificates, privacy policy, and company transparency

Recommended for

  • Users should conduct their own due diligence before using this service
  • Verify through independent review sites, trust indicators like BBB or Trustpilot if available
  • Check domain age and reputation using tools like WHOIS lookup

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Jekyll 1 video + Add
CreateFiles+ 1 video + Add

Getting Started With Jekyll, The Static Site Generator

CreateFiles+ Demo

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Jekyll
CreateFiles+
100% 100%
CMS
0% 0%
0% 0%
OS & Utilities
100% 100%
100% 100%
Blogging
0% 0%
0% 0%
Productivity
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Jekyll and CreateFiles+.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

CreateFiles+'s answer:

Xcode and Swift

What makes your product unique?

CreateFiles+'s answer:

macOS should have created this feature out of the box but does not exist. Windows users have had this feature for over a decade. I created this to remove that gap for macOS users.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

CreateFiles+'s answer:

I am not familiar with any competitors doing this today.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

CreateFiles+'s answer:

Power Users, Developers, Productivity focused users, students, teachers, creators.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

CreateFiles+'s answer:

Its brand new so that is yet to be determined.

What's the story behind your product?

CreateFiles+'s answer:

I have struggled with not having this capability in Finder for years and decided I would fix the problem for me and then see if other users would want the same solution.

User comments

Share your experience with using Jekyll and CreateFiles+. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Jekyll no reviews yet
CreateFiles+ no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of CreateFiles+ yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Jekyll 204 mentions
CreateFiles+ 0 mentions
  • Managing private data from the web securely on AWS
    My bookmarks have been public since 1998, and the previous version, bookmarks-v3.0, was a static site generated by Jekyll and published on GitHub Pages: it cost nothing, and for a list of public links it was good enough. The criterion... - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago
  • Setting up a hugo static site hosted with Porkbun
    This is a static site generated with hugo with the PaperMod theme. I wanted an easy to use static site generator. I considered Jekyll And believe it to be a good choice for static sites. There seemed to be slightly more themes I liked... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • So, you want to vibecode a linkblog?
    First of all, I modified my publishing programs to keep a (local) copy of each link published modulePublicationCache and then I thought about using it for my linkblog. I like very much jekyll for a blog and I requested to some AIs... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

View more

Tracking CreateFiles+ since Jun 2026.

Alternatives to Jekyll and CreateFiles+

When comparing Jekyll and CreateFiles+, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...