
Scrimba
Codédex
CodeCrafters
Data Protocol
Codelita
Eloquent JavaScript
The State of JavaScript 2018
A free resource for learning and developing in JavaScript

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Squoosh seems to be a lot more popular than JavaScript.com. While we know about 202 links to Squoosh, we've tracked only 1 mention of JavaScript.com.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | javascript.com | squoosh.app |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of JavaScript.com yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Web developers, designers, bloggers, and anyone needing to optimize images for the web, particularly those concerned about maintaining image quality while reducing file size.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No JavaScript.com videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Jumbo Squoosh-o’s Review! #SLIMESTAGRAM #JumboSquooshos
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using JavaScript.com and Squoosh. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of JavaScript.com yet. Be the first one to post
The only negative thing about this web app, is that it's not clear which formats are supported in which browsers.
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


The best resource I know of is Javascript.com for learning Javascript for the first time. It's made by Pluralsight which is a site that contains courses. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
WebP/AVIF over PNG/JPG: Converted all icons to WebP (using Squoosh) – average size reduction of ~60% (e.g., a 40KB PNG icon became 15KB WebP). - Source: dev.to / 10 days ago
It often comes down to compat, and developer requests. Personally I find in-browser encoding for images inadequate, because it doesn't expose enough options. When we built https://squoosh.app/, we exposed the browser encoders for... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
Its a fun challenge. I used https://squoosh.app to make a pretty good one. Mostly just a resize and then OxiPNG for compression. Managed a 124x62 black/white image. OP has a resolution of 195x53, so I had very similar, but slightly worse... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
When comparing JavaScript.com and Squoosh, you can also consider the following products.

Interactive coding screencasts created in an instant
Compare Scrimba to JavaScript.com or Squoosh:

Make your website faster and save bandwidth. TinyPNG optimizes your PNG images by 50-80% while preserving full transparency!
Compare TinyPNG to JavaScript.com or Squoosh:


iLoveIMG is one of most powerful solution that comes with all the major tool you cloud want to edit images in bulk.
Compare iLoveIMG to JavaScript.com or Squoosh:

Programming exercises for experienced engineers.
Compare CodeCrafters to JavaScript.com or Squoosh:

Compress your pictures up to 90% without visible quality loss.
Compare Caesium Image Compressor to JavaScript.com or Squoosh: