IsItWP VS code-prettify

• Ease of Use
  IsItWP provides a user-friendly interface that makes it simple for users to check whether a site uses WordPress, making it accessible even for those with limited technical knowledge.
• Comprehensive Information
  The tool offers detailed insights into the WordPress themes and plugins used by a website, which can be beneficial for developers and designers seeking inspiration or competitive analysis.
• Free Service
  IsItWP is available at no cost, providing users with valuable website analysis without any financial commitment.
• Quick Results
  The tool delivers fast results, enabling users to quickly determine if a site is using WordPress and gather other relevant details.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited to WordPress
  IsItWP is specifically tailored for WordPress detection, which means it does not provide insights for websites built on other content management systems.
• Potential Inaccuracies
  In some instances, the tool may not accurately detect WordPress usage if the website employs strong obfuscation techniques or custom configurations.
• Reduced Functionality
  Compared to more comprehensive website analysis tools, IsItWP focuses primarily on CMS detection, lacking more extensive performance or SEO analysis features.
• Advertisement Presence
  As a free tool, IsItWP includes ads, which might distract some users or interfere with their overall experience using the site.

• Easy to Integrate
  Code-prettify is simple to integrate into web projects. It uses plain JavaScript and works by adding a single script tag to your HTML, which makes it easy to set up.
• Language Support
  The library supports a wide range of programming languages out of the box, which makes it versatile for various types of code highlighting without needing additional plugins.
• Lightweight
  Compared to some other syntax highlighters, code-prettify has a relatively small footprint, which helps in maintaining fast loading times for web pages.
• Browser Compatibility
  It is compatible with most modern and older browsers, ensuring consistent syntax highlighting across different client environments.

Possible disadvantages

• Archived Status
  The repository is archived, meaning it is no longer actively maintained by Google. This could pose issues with future compatibility or bug fixes.
• Customization Limitations
  While it provides a decent level of default styling, customization options are limited compared to some other syntax highlighters that offer more theming flexibility.
• Lack of Recent Updates
  Being an archived project, it doesn't receive updates or improvements, missing out on newer features or optimizations available in currently maintained libraries.
• Community Support
  As the project is no longer active, community support may be limited, making it potentially challenging to get help or find resources for troubleshooting issues.

• How to know if a website is using a website build service or if it is made from scratch? Is there a way?

  Https://whatcms.org/ if it's WordPress you can then use https://isitwp.com to find general things like theme or plugins. Source: almost 4 years ago

• NanoMD: Lightweight Markdown Editor

  Integrated Google Icon and code-prettify for syntax highlighting. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago