Software Alternatives & Startups

IPv6 test VS ShellNewHandler

Compare IPv6 test VS ShellNewHandler and see what are their differences

IPv6 test

IPv6-test.

Rating
0 reviews
ShellNewHandler

SourceForge.net: ShellNewHandler details page

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, IPv6 test seems to be a lot more popular than ShellNewHandler. While we know about 57 links to IPv6 test, we've tracked only 2 mentions of ShellNewHandler.

social mentions
57 vs 2
IP Data popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

IP
IPv6 test
ShellNewHandler
Website ipv6-test.com sourceforge.net
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

IP
IPv6 test 4 features
ShellNewHandler 0 features
  • Comprehensive Testing
    The IPv6 test on ipv6-test.com provides a thorough analysis of IPv6 and IPv4 connectivity, helping users to understand their compatibility and readiness for IPv6.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The website is designed to be intuitive and easy to use, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise.
  • Detailed Results
    Users receive detailed information on their IPv6 and IPv4 addresses, including latency and connectivity status, allowing for in-depth analysis of network performance.
  • No Cost
    The service is free, providing a cost-effective way for individuals and organizations to assess their IPv6 readiness without financial investment.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited to Basic Testing
    While useful for initial assessments, the test may not cover advanced networking scenarios, potentially limiting its utility for complex network environments.
  • Reliance on Browser Capabilities
    The accuracy of the test results can be affected by the user's browser and network configuration, which may lead to inconsistent or misleading information.
  • No Diagnostic Tools
    The site does not offer tools to diagnose or fix IPv6 connectivity issues, limiting its usefulness to merely identifying the presence or absence of IPv6 support.
  • Lack of Historical Data
    The test does not provide historical data or trends over time, making it difficult for users to track improvements or regressions in their IPv6 readiness.

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

IP
IPv6 test
ShellNewHandler

No analysis of IPv6 test yet.

Overall verdict

  • ShellNewHandler is a niche, lightweight utility hosted on SourceForge designed to give users more control over the Windows 'New' context menu (the ShellNew menu). It can be considered good for its specific narrow use case, but it is an older, minimally maintained tool that may not suit all users, especially those on modern Windows versions.

Why this product is good

  • Provides direct control over customizing the Windows right-click 'New' menu, allowing users to add or remove file type entries
  • Lightweight and free, without bundled bloatware typical of some other free utilities
  • Simple and focused in scope, making it easy to understand for its specific purpose
  • Open distribution via SourceForge allows transparency and no-cost access

Recommended for

  • Power users who want to declutter or customize the Windows New context menu
  • IT administrators managing standardized desktop environments across multiple machines
  • Users comfortable with older utility-style tools and Windows registry-related tweaks
  • Not recommended for casual users seeking modern, actively supported software with regular updates

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

IP
IPv6 test 1 video + Add
ShellNewHandler 0 videos + Add

IPV6 Test for Apple Review

No ShellNewHandler videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
IP
IPv6 test
ShellNewHandler
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using IPv6 test and ShellNewHandler. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

IP
IPv6 test 57 mentions
ShellNewHandler 2 mentions
  • IP address with Eero is weird?
    You can see both addresses here. https://ipv6-test.com/ Likely your ISP has IPv6 and your old router wasn't capable or setup for it. The new one has it enabled by default, and web browsers prefer it over 4, so basic IP address pages show... Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Yet another problem with IPv6 on Ubuntu Server
    IPv6 works perfectly well on the router, and my LAN devices can ping each other via their prefix-delegated addresses, but I can't reach the www via IPv6 (according to ipv6-test.com and ping6). Source: about 3 years ago
  • Microsoft Edge and test-ipv6.com don't seem to work well together.
    For other sites, Edge is clearly using my IPv6 client address. https://ipv6-test.com and https://ipv6.google.com work fine, for example. And I can confirm in logs on my external site that I'm hitting my site with the client's temp IPv6... Source: over 3 years ago

View more

  • I recently got libreoffice, but now the new option in right click looks like a mess. Can someone help me get rid of them please?
    Use Shell New Handler. Run the portable app and simply untick the items you don't want to appear in your new context menu. Source: about 4 years ago
  • This menu should be easy to add/remove programs to... Who is really creating Access Databases from this menu often enough to keep it here? (Not me!) Is there an easy way to edit this?
    I've always used ShellNewHandler for this. It's a really simple portable utility that allows you to remove most of the items from that menu. Tested it out on Windows 11 and it's still compatible. Source: over 5 years ago

Alternatives to IPv6 test and ShellNewHandler

When comparing IPv6 test and ShellNewHandler, you can also consider the following products.