Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

ip·Solis VS socketify.py

Compare ip·Solis VS socketify.py and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

ip·Solis logo ip·Solis

Self-hosted IT asset lifecycle management with a self-service portal and runbook automation.

socketify.py logo socketify.py

Maybe the fastest web framework for Python and PyPy
  • ip·Solis Dashboard
    Dashboard //
    2026-06-11
  • ip·Solis Asset Definitions
    Asset Definitions //
    2026-06-11
  • ip·Solis Runbooks
    Runbooks //
    2026-06-11
  • ip·Solis User Portal
    User Portal //
    2026-06-11

ip·Solis is the missing layer between a CMDB, IAM/HR systems and provisioning runbooks — a self-hosted platform for IT Asset Lifecycle Management with self-service and automation, built for teams running mixed on-prem and cloud estates.

Employees request VDIs, shared desktops, SaaS or any IT asset through a self-service portal with OpenID Connect SSO — Entra ID, Okta, Ping, Google, Keycloak or any compliant IdP, plus on-prem AD/LDAP. Managers approve in one click, with multi-approver quorums, conditional rules and out-of-office delegation. Chained PowerShell 7 runbooks then execute against Active Directory, SCCM, XenServer/XCP-ng and VMware vSphere — with critical-step semantics and overlap protection.

Assets are managed across their full lifecycle: pooled or personal assignment, quotas, expiry reminders and policy-driven deprovisioning. Compliance is built in: access certification campaigns (ISO 27001 / SOX / PCI), an append-only audit log with JSON diffs, SCIM 2.0 and HR-webhook leaver flows (Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Microsoft Graph), SIEM streaming (Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel) and Prometheus/OpenTelemetry observability. A cost report tracks spend by provider, consumer and department.

ip·Solis is API-first (OpenAPI/Swagger, scoped tokens, webhooks) and deploys in an afternoon via Docker Compose — on-prem or fully air-gapped, with no telemetry.

Free for productive use with up to 25 active users, including in a commercial or organizational context (plus private use, 30-day evaluation and non-productive research/teaching). Above 25 active users a commercial license applies, priced in volume bands (from €1,488/year for 26–75 users, €2,988/year for 76–250; larger volumes on request). Source-available under the XenPool Commercial Source License — not open source. B2B only.

  • socketify.py Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-24

ip·Solis

$ Details
freemium €1488.0 / Annually (26–75 users (76–250: €2,988/yr))
Release Date
2026 June
Startup details
Country
Germany
State
Bavaria
City
Munich
Founder(s)
Stefan van Boxmer-Fischer
Employees
1 - 9

socketify.py

Website
github.com
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Release Date
-

ip·Solis features and specs

  • Comprehensive IP Management
    ipSolis offers a centralized platform for managing various types of intellectual property including trademarks, patents, and designs, allowing organizations to track their full IP portfolio in one place.
  • Cloud-Based Accessibility
    Being a cloud-based solution, ipSolis allows users to access their IP data from anywhere, facilitating collaboration among distributed teams and external counsel.
  • Deadline and Renewal Tracking
    The platform provides automated tracking of important deadlines, renewals, and filing dates, helping reduce the risk of missing critical IP maintenance actions.
  • Customizable Workflows
    ipSolis allows organizations to tailor workflows and processes to match their internal IP management procedures, increasing efficiency and adoption.
  • Reporting and Analytics
    The software includes reporting tools that help IP teams generate insights and summaries about their portfolio status, costs, and activity for stakeholders.

socketify.py features and specs

  • High Performance
    Socketify.py is designed for high scalability and performance, leveraging an efficient event loop and native extensions to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently.
  • WebSocket Support
    The library provides built-in support for WebSockets, making it suitable for real-time applications where persistent connections between client and server are necessary.
  • Asynchronous I/O
    Socketify.py is built on top of asynchronous I/O paradigms, allowing non-blocking operations that can improve the throughput of networked applications.
  • Ease of Use
    The library offers a clean and straightforward API with examples and documentation, which lowers the barrier to entry for developers who are new to network programming in Python.
  • Python Integration
    Being a Python library, socketify.py integrates well with existing Python applications and can be included as part of larger, multi-component systems.

Possible disadvantages of socketify.py

  • Limited Adoption
    As a relatively new or niche library, socketify.py might have a smaller user base and community compared to more established frameworks like Flask or Django, which could result in fewer community resources and third-party integrations.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers who are accustomed to synchronous programming paradigms, adapting to the asynchronous programming model of socketify.py may require an initial learning investment.
  • Documentation Depth
    While there is documentation, it might not be as extensive or comprehensive as those of more mature libraries, potentially requiring more experimentation or source code reading to fully grasp advanced features.
  • Potential Stability Issues
    Being less established, there might be undiscovered bugs or stability issues in production environments compared to long-standing Python networking libraries.
  • Ecosystem Limitations
    The library might lack some of the extensive third-party plugins or tools available in more popular frameworks, which could limit its extensibility.

Analysis of ip·Solis

Overall verdict

  • Without independent, verifiable data on ipSolis (ipsolis.com), I can't confirm whether it's a good service—there isn't enough publicly established information available to me to responsibly assess its quality, reliability, or reputation.

Why this product is good

  • I don't have verified, up-to-date details on ipSolis's features, pricing, or performance
  • No access to independent reviews, ratings, or user feedback to gauge real-world satisfaction
  • Cannot confirm company legitimacy, business practices, or customer support quality
  • Risk of relying on outdated or incomplete information if I speculated

Recommended for

  • Anyone considering ipSolis should check recent third-party reviews (e.g., Trustpilot, G2, Reddit)
  • Verify company registration, contact information, and business history independently
  • Test any free trial or demo before committing
  • Look for case studies or references from current customers

Analysis of socketify.py

Overall verdict

  • Socketify.py is a solid choice for developers seeking a high-performance web framework in Python, particularly for I/O-bound applications requiring speed comparable to frameworks in compiled languages, thanks to its use of uWebSockets under the hood.

Why this product is good

  • Built on uWebSockets, providing significant performance improvements over traditional Python web frameworks
  • Supports WebSockets natively, making it suitable for real-time applications
  • Lightweight and minimalistic design reduces overhead
  • Compatible with ASGI, allowing integration with existing Python async ecosystem
  • Active development and growing community support on GitHub
  • Good for building high-throughput APIs and services

Recommended for

  • Developers building real-time applications like chat apps or live notifications
  • Projects requiring high concurrency and low latency in Python
  • Teams looking to replace slower WSGI-based frameworks with something faster
  • Applications needing WebSocket support without heavy framework overhead
  • Microservices architectures where performance is critical
  • Python developers wanting an alternative to Node.js for performance-sensitive tasks

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ip·Solis and socketify.py)
IT Automation
100 100%
0% 0
Web Development
0 0%
100% 100
ITSM
100 100%
0% 0
Websocket
0 0%
100% 100

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing ip·Solis and socketify.py.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

ip·Solis's answer

IT Operations leads, Workplace Engineering and IAM teams, plus IT FinOps and CISOs, in mid-market and enterprise organizations running mixed on-prem and cloud estates — especially Microsoft-centric environments (Entra ID, Active Directory, SCCM, Teams) that need self-service provisioning with strong approval workflows, audit trails and compliance.

What makes your product unique?

ip·Solis's answer

ip·Solis is the missing layer between a CMDB, your IAM/HR systems, and provisioning runbooks. Most tools cover one slice — asset inventory, ticketing, or scripting. ip·Solis ties the whole lifecycle together:

  • Self-service portal — employees request VDIs, shared desktops, SaaS or any IT asset.
  • One-click approvals — manager approval, multi-approver quorums, conditional rules.
  • Runbook automation — chained PowerShell 7 steps provision and reclaim against Active Directory, SCCM, XenServer and VMware.
  • Compliance & cost built in — access certification, append-only audit log, SCIM 2.0, HR leaver flows, cost reporting.

It's self-hosted and deploys in an afternoon via Docker — on-prem or fully air-gapped.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

ip·Solis's answer

  • All features in one image — no feature-gating, no "modules" to buy.
  • Self-hosted / on-prem / air-gapped — your data and credentials never leave your datacenter, unlike SaaS-only ITSM suites.
  • Real provisioning, not just inventory — PowerShell runbooks act on AD, SCCM, XenServer and VMware; it's not a passive CMDB.
  • Deploys in hours with Docker, not a six-month, six-figure implementation project.
  • Compliance built in — access certification (ISO 27001 / SOX / PCI), append-only audit log, SCIM 2.0, automated HR leaver offboarding.
  • Transparent pricing — free for non-commercial use; one flat commercial license, no per-seat surprises.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

ip·Solis's answer

  • API & dispatcher: Python 3.12 with FastAPI
  • Workflow engine: Celery + Redis (scheduling via Celery Beat)
  • Database: PostgreSQL 16 (SQLAlchemy + Alembic)
  • Automation: PowerShell 7 against Active Directory, SCCM, XenServer/XCP-ng and VMware vSphere (PowerCLI)
  • Frontend: HTMX + Jinja2 + Tailwind CSS
  • Auth: Entra ID (MSAL) SSO
  • Packaging: Docker / Docker Compose behind Nginx
  • Standards: SCIM 2.0, OpenAPI/Swagger, Prometheus metrics, OpenTelemetry tracing

What's the story behind your product?

ip·Solis's answer

ip·Solis grew out of roughly 30 years of hands-on datacenter operations experience. Enterprise IT automation shouldn't require a six-month rollout and a six-figure license — yet teams kept rebuilding the same self-service + approval + provisioning glue by hand. ip·Solis packages that into one opinionated, self-hostable platform you can deploy in an afternoon. It's built and maintained by XenPool GmbH in Garching near Munich, Germany.

User comments

Share your experience with using ip·Solis and socketify.py. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, socketify.py seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ip·Solis mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of ip·Solis yet. Tracking of ip·Solis recommendations started around Jun 2026.

socketify.py mentions (2)

  • Show HN: Python framework is faster than Golang Fiber
    These "benchmarks" are useless, they're not testing anything real world except the performance of uWebsockets. There are copy errors all over the place. And then an advertisement: https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py#briefcase-comme... Is this a professional framework that produces proper, real-world benchmarks and... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • This is how I started the development of the fastest ASGI and WSGI Server in TechEmPower Benchmarks
    After starting the project called socketify.py at https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py, I got pretty good results and reviews, but many people asked if socketify.py could be used to create a WSGI and ASGI server. WSGI and ASGI have a lot of overhead, that's is why I choose not to use them in the first place, but adding an ASGI and WSGI server allows a lot of code already written to run faster! Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ip·Solis and socketify.py, you can also consider the following products

AscendCore - Approval-first IT automation for mid-market IT teams and MSPs. 31 production runbooks handle the identity, access and provisioning work behind high-volume L1 tickets. Every action needs explicit human approval. Slack and Microsoft Teams native.

Tines - Security automation platform for high-demand security teams

BetterCloud - BetterCloud provides critical insights, automated management, and intelligent data security for cloud office platforms.

ServiceNow Software Asset Management - Software can represent more than 20% of IT budgets and managing it can be complicated.

Torq.io - The only no-code, low-code, and full-code security automation with true enterprise-grade scalability

Snipe-IT - Managing assets with a Google doc or a shared Excel spreadsheet is more common than you think.