Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
TP

Make.com VS TinyProxy

Compare Make.com VS TinyProxy and see what are their differences

Anyone.com
The smarter way to buy, sell, and close real estate transactions. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Make.com logo Make.com

Tool for workflow automation (Former Integromat)

TinyProxy logo TinyProxy

A lightweight http(s) proxy daemon
  • Make.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-05
  • TinyProxy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-11-18

Make.com features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Make.com offers a user-friendly interface with drag-and-drop functionality, making it accessible for non-technical users.
  • Integration Options
    The platform supports a wide array of integrations with popular apps and services, enabling complex workflows.
  • Custom Workflows
    Users can create highly customized workflows tailored to specific business needs, allowing for greater flexibility.
  • Scalability
    Make.com is built to handle both small-scale and enterprise-level tasks, providing a scalable solution as your business grows.
  • Community and Support
    There is an active community and comprehensive support, including documentation and forums, to help users troubleshoot and optimize their usage.
  • Real-time Monitoring and Analytics
    The platform offers real-time monitoring and analytics, allowing users to track the performance of their workflows and make data-driven decisions.
  • Versatile Triggers and Actions
    Make.com offers a variety of triggers and actions that can be used to automate a wide range of tasks across different services.

Possible disadvantages of Make.com

  • Pricing
    The pricing structure can be expensive for small businesses or individual users, especially for advanced features and high-volume usage.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, there is still a learning curve for newcomers to understand all the capabilities and features.
  • Occasional Bugs
    Users have reported occasional bugs and issues, which can disrupt workflows and require troubleshooting.
  • Limited Offline Support
    Make.com heavily relies on internet connectivity, which can be a drawback for users requiring offline functionality.
  • Complexity for Advanced Features
    While basic workflows are easy to set up, leveraging more advanced features may require a deeper understanding of the platform and potentially some coding knowledge.
  • Dependency on Third-party Services
    The platformโ€™s effectiveness is influenced by the reliability and performance of third-party services it integrates with, making it susceptible to external issues.
  • Data Privacy Concerns
    Storing and processing data through third-party services may raise privacy and compliance issues for businesses dealing with sensitive information.

TinyProxy features and specs

  • Lightweight
    TinyProxy has a small footprint, making it highly efficient in terms of resource consumption.
  • Easy to Configure
    With a simple configuration file, TinyProxy is easy to set up and configure according to specific needs.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source solution, TinyProxy is free to use and can be modified to fit unique use cases.
  • Minimal Dependencies
    TinyProxy requires minimal dependencies, simplifying installation and maintenance on various systems.
  • HTTP Proxy Support
    It supports HTTP proxy functionality, making it suitable for basic web proxy needs.

Possible disadvantages of TinyProxy

  • Limited Features
    TinyProxy offers basic functionality and lacks more advanced features found in other proxy solutions.
  • Security Limitations
    Due to its minimalistic nature, TinyProxy has limited security features such as traffic encryption.
  • No Web UI
    TinyProxy does not come with a web-based user interface, making management less intuitive for some users.
  • Not Ideal for Large Scale
    Its lightweight design means it may not scale well for large enterprise environments compared to more robust proxy solutions.
  • Lack of Comprehensive Documentation
    The documentation can be sparse, making troubleshooting and advanced configuration challenging for new users.

Analysis of Make.com

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Make.com is considered a good platform for those looking to streamline processes and improve efficiency through automation. Its flexible and powerful features cater to a wide range of needs, although there may be a learning curve for those new to automation or with limited technical knowledge.

Why this product is good

  • Make.com, formerly known as Integromat, is a popular platform for automating workflows and integrating various software tools. It offers a visual interface that allows users to connect different applications and automate repetitive tasks, enhancing productivity. Its ability to create complex multi-step automations with various conditions and triggers makes it a robust tool for both small businesses and larger enterprises.

Recommended for

  • small business owners
  • project managers
  • IT professionals
  • digital marketers
  • anyone looking to automate tasks without extensive coding knowledge

Make.com videos

+ Add

Zapier vs Integromat - Quick Comparison Review

More videos:

  • Review - Integromat feature tour
  • Review - Introduction to Integromat

TinyProxy videos

+ Add

kodi recording nbc with ffmpeg without tinyproxy - kodi recording videos - 20

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Make.com and TinyProxy)

Make.com

TinyProxy

Automation
100 100%
Automation
0% 0
Proxy
0 0%
Proxy
100% 100
Workflow Automation
100 100%
Workflow Automation
0% 0
Proxy Server
0 0%
Proxy Server
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Make.com and TinyProxy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Make.com and TinyProxy

Make.com Reviews

Best Zapier alternatives for technical teams in 2026
If you want the strongest option for technical control, start with n8n. If you want a more flexible but still approachable managed platform, test Make. If the decision is broader than one direct replacement, compare the category through AI automation tools and n8n vs Zapier.
Source: flowmationhq.com
Autonomous Automation Platforms: Aident VS n8n VS Make
Aident AI is the leading autonomous automation platform for users who prefer building workflows through natural language conversation rather than complex visual maps. While n8n and Make serve developers and visual thinkers with powerful node-based editors, Aident's agentic engine eliminates the steep learning curve by compiling plain English instructions into executable...
Source: aident.ai
The Best n8n.io Alternatives for Workflow Automation in 2025
Make, formerly known as Integromat, is a versatile no-code platform that enables users to create sophisticated workflows with ease. It offers a visual workflow builder that allows users to connect various applications and services, define conditional logic, and manipulate data without writing any code. Make's strengths lie in its ability to handle complex workflows and its...
Source: latenode.com
N8n.io Alternatives
One of the standout features of Integromat is its flexibility and customization options. Users can set up multi-step workflows with conditional logic, ensuring that each automation is tailored to their specific needs. Additionally, Integromat offers advanced error handling and data manipulation capabilities, providing robust solutions for complex automation requirements. For...
Source: apix-drive.com
The Best MuleSoft Alternatives [2024]
Make (formerly Integromat) is an integration solution that allows you to automate and connect applications, databases, web services, chatbots, and other systems.
Source: exalate.com

TinyProxy Reviews

  1. Stan
    ยท Founder at SaaSHub ยท
    It was easier to install and use than expected

    Super simple and straight to the point. All I had to do, in a linux server, was this:

    • install it => apt install tinyproxy
    • configure hosts allowed to connect
    • reload configs => service tinyproxy reload
    ๐Ÿ Competitors: banu.com TinyProxy, Squid Proxy
    ๐Ÿ‘ Pros:    Super simple|Easy to use

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, TinyProxy seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Make.com mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Make.com yet. Tracking of Make.com recommendations started around Mar 2021.

TinyProxy mentions (8)

  • Duct tape enough services together and you can cache APT packages
    The first result led me to TinyProxywhich was the exactly what I needed. Itโ€™s a small, proxy server that handles forwarding HTTPS requests, requiring almost zero configuration, and has on-going maintenance. Adding it to the container and updating HAProxy to pass the appropriate traffic to it filled in the missing piece. It would handle HTTPS traffic while Nginx continued to handle caching. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Overcoming Geo-Blocked Feature Testing with Zero-Budget DevOps Strategies
    Leverage open-source proxy tools like mitmproxy or tinyproxy, which allow you to intercept and modify HTTP requests and responses in real-time. By configuring these, you can simulate different geo conditions:. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • I Add 3-25 Seconds of Latency to Every Page I Visit (2020)
    Probably by modifying the source code of https://tinyproxy.github.io (it's a lightweight proxy, but modifying the source would be not a 5-minute thing...). - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Web Debugging Proxy to Remove Headers from Incoming Requests
    I found Privoxy, and it seems to do what I want, so maybe wondering if anyone would be eager to recommend. There is also Tinyproxy, but it can only add headers not remove them. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Chromium Spelunking: Connecting to Proxies
    To test proxying,I'm using tinyproxy, running a very simple config on port 8080. This supports SPDY (HTTP/2), which is a complication I don't really want to consider at this point, but the analysis ends up quite similar to HTTP/1. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Make.com and TinyProxy, you can also consider the following products

Zapier - Connect the apps you use everyday to automate your work and be more productive. 1000+ apps and easy integrations - get started in minutes.

Squid Proxy - Website Content Acceleration and Distribution. Thousands of web-sites around the Internet use Squid to drastically increase their content delivery. Squid can reduce your server load and improve delivery speeds to clients.

n8n.io - Free and open fair-code licensed node based Workflow Automation Tool. Easily automate tasks across different services.

Varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator

ifttt - IFTTT puts the internet to work for you. Create simple connections between the products you use every day.

Polipo - A small and fast caching web proxy (a web cache, an HTTP proxy, a proxy server).

Loading...