Software Alternatives & Startups

InputMapper VS cppq

Compare InputMapper VS cppq and see what are their differences

InputMapper

Input Mapper is designed to bridge the gap between the devices you use and the games you play.

Rating
0 reviews
cppq

Simple, reliable & efficient distributed task queue for C++

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, InputMapper seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 8 times since March 2021.

social mentions
8 vs 0
Gaming popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

InputMapper
cppq
Website beta.inputmapper.com github.com
Listed in —

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

InputMapper 4 features
cppq 5 features
  • Versatility
    InputMapper supports a wide range of controllers and devices, making it highly versatile for different gaming setups.
  • Customization
    Users can customize button mappings and profiles extensively to suit their personal preferences or specific game requirements.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The application offers a user-friendly interface, making it accessible even for those who are not technically proficient.
  • Community Support
    InputMapper has an active community and official support which offers assistance and plugin development for new features.

Possible disadvantages

  • Performance Issues
    Some users report performance issues, particularly with latency and connection stability when using certain controllers.
  • Limited Updates
    The software doesn't receive updates as frequently as some users would prefer, which can lead to issues with newer games or devices.
  • Compatibility
    There can be compatibility issues with certain games or operating systems, requiring workarounds or additional tweaking.
  • Complex Setup
    For some users, especially newcomers, the initial setup process can be complex and may require following detailed guides.
  • Lightweight C++ implementation
    cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
  • Redis-backed reliability
    Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
  • Inspired by proven design (asynq)
    The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
  • Native integration for C++ projects
    For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
  • Open source and inspectable
    Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited maturity and battle-testing
    Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
  • Smaller community and ecosystem
    Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
  • Documentation gaps
    As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
  • C++ build and dependency complexity
    Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
  • Fewer built-in features and tooling
    cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

InputMapper
cppq

Overall verdict

  • Overall, InputMapper is considered a helpful tool for gamers looking to customize their device inputs. While the beta version may have some bugs or stability issues, its functionality and flexibility make it a worthwhile option for tech-savvy users who are willing to troubleshoot potential issues or those who require specific control configurations.

Why this product is good

  • InputMapper is a popular tool primarily used for mapping input devices such as controllers to different configurations. Its utility comes from its ability to enhance the gaming experience by allowing users to customize controls for better comfort and gameplay. This can be particularly beneficial for games that have limited control customization options natively. The tool also supports multiple devices, making it versatile for a wide range of input needs.

Recommended for

  • Gamers seeking customizable controller configurations
  • Users with non-standard input devices
  • Individuals who enjoy tweaking and optimizing their gaming setups

Overall verdict

  • cppq is a lightweight, Redis-backed distributed task queue for C++ inspired by Go's popular 'asynq' library. It's a good choice for developers who need a simple, dependency-light job queue system in C++ without the overhead of larger enterprise messaging systems, though it's a smaller, less battle-tested project compared to mature alternatives.

Why this product is good

  • Simple and lightweight design makes it easy to understand and integrate into existing C++ projects
  • Built on Redis, a well-established and reliable backend for queue storage, giving it a solid foundation
  • Inspired by asynq (a proven Go library), so the design patterns and task queue semantics are based on a well-thought-out model
  • Open source on GitHub, allowing developers to inspect, modify, and contribute to the code
  • Good fit for projects already using Redis, minimizing the need for additional infrastructure
  • Straightforward API for enqueueing and processing background jobs in C++ applications

Recommended for

  • C++ developers needing a background job/task queue without adopting a heavyweight message broker
  • Projects already using Redis as part of their infrastructure
  • Small to medium-sized applications requiring asynchronous task processing
  • Teams comfortable working with less mainstream or smaller open-source libraries and willing to contribute or debug issues themselves
  • Developers familiar with asynq (Go) looking for a similar pattern in C++
  • Prototyping or hobby projects where a minimal task queue solution is sufficient

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

InputMapper 2 videos + Add
cppq 0 videos + Add

Use a PS4 Controller in Steam with Inputmapper

More videos

  • - How to connect your ps4 controller to your pc windows 10 Using InputMapper 2019!!!

No cppq videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
InputMapper
cppq
100% 100%
0% 0%
100% 100%
0% 0%
100% 100%
0% 0%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using InputMapper and cppq. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

InputMapper no reviews yet
cppq no reviews yet
  • Top 5 REWASD Alternatives in 2021
    keyboardkings.com · Jul 2022

    InputMapper uses PS4 and virtual Xbox 360 controllers for key mapping of keyboards to make sure different games and applications work effectively. It is free to use, and you can expect it to evolve a lot, so it would...

  • Fantastic Controller Mappers and Where to Find Them
    www.rewasd.com · Oct 2018

    In general, InputMapper (which is also called DS4Windows) is a good controller mapping software for those who have a DualShock 4 controller. But if you’re looking for deeper features, or using any controller except...

We have no reviews of cppq yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

InputMapper 8 mentions
cppq 0 mentions
  • I feel like I’m digressing
    You can use either this or this I believe to change shit around to where you can figure out one way or another of playing with two people despite the issues you mentioned. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Controller Issue
    This may be of some use to you, maybe? Source: over 3 years ago
  • free alternative to reWASD
    It mentions some alternatives, though, such as Input Mapper and Xpadder. If your games are on Steam, you could try Steam's controller config thing. Source: over 3 years ago

View more

Tracking cppq since Nov 2022.

Alternatives to InputMapper and cppq

When comparing InputMapper and cppq, you can also consider the following products.