Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

InputLock VS Codeship

Compare InputLock VS Codeship and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

InputLock logo InputLock

Lock your input method(IME) on macOS

Codeship logo Codeship

Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.
  • InputLock Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-10-16
  • Codeship Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19

InputLock features and specs

  • Prevents accidental input
    InputLock is designed to block keyboard and mouse input, which is useful for preventing accidental keystrokes or clicks during activities like cleaning your keyboard, letting children watch videos, or giving presentations without interruptions.
  • Simple and focused functionality
    The app appears to serve a single, clear purpose of locking input devices, making it easy to understand and use without a steep learning curve or unnecessary features.
  • Useful for specific scenarios
    It caters well to niche use cases such as media playback for kids, keyboard maintenance, or preventing tampering while a computer is unattended but still displaying content.
  • Quick toggle control
    Applications of this type typically offer fast enabling and disabling of the lock via a hotkey or shortcut, allowing users to regain control quickly when needed.
  • Lightweight utility
    As a small single-purpose tool, it likely consumes minimal system resources and does not burden the computer while running in the background.

Possible disadvantages of InputLock

  • Limited scope
    Because the app focuses solely on locking input, it may not offer broader functionality that some users might expect from a more comprehensive system control or parental-control tool.
  • Potential lockout risk
    If the unlock hotkey or method is forgotten or fails, users could find themselves temporarily unable to control their computer, which can be frustrating or require a restart.
  • Platform availability uncertainty
    It may only be available on certain operating systems, limiting its usefulness for people who work across multiple platforms or use less common systems.
  • Sparse public information
    There is limited widely available documentation, reviews, or community feedback about the app, making it harder to assess reliability and long-term support before committing to it.
  • Security considerations
    Software that intercepts or blocks all keyboard and mouse input requires deep system access, which may raise privacy or security concerns for cautious users who want to verify how their input is handled.

Codeship features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Codeship offers an intuitive interface that simplifies the setup process, making it accessible for developers who may not be experienced with continuous integration (CI) and continuous deployment (CD) tools.
  • Integration with Cloud Services
    Codeship integrates seamlessly with cloud services such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Heroku, facilitating easy deployment of applications.
  • Flexible Workflows
    The tool provides support for both Codeship Basic and Codeship Pro, allowing for flexibility in choosing between a more straightforward or a more customizable CI/CD workflow.
  • Docker Support
    Codeship Pro offers extensive support for Docker, allowing developers to use containerization strategies for their build and deployment processes.
  • Parallel Test Pipelines
    It supports parallel test pipelines, which can significantly speed up the testing process and reduce build times.
  • Slack Integration
    Codeship integrates with communication tools like Slack, enabling notifications and updates directly within team communication channels.

Possible disadvantages of Codeship

  • Cost
    Codeship can be more expensive compared to other CI/CD tools, particularly for larger teams or more complex projects that require more build resources.
  • Limited Customization
    For highly customized CI/CD processes, Codeship Basic might be limiting. Users may need to switch to Codeship Pro, which requires more configuration and a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    Users have reported occasional performance bottlenecks, particularly under heavy workloads, which can slow down the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Plugin Ecosystem
    The plugin ecosystem for Codeship is not as extensive as some other CI/CD tools like Jenkins, potentially limiting its integration capabilities.
  • Learning Curve
    While Codeship Basic is relatively easy to use, Codeship Pro has a steeper learning curve, particularly for users who are new to Docker and advanced CI/CD practices.
  • Support
    Although support is available, some users have reported slower response times and less comprehensive support compared to other CI/CD platforms.

Analysis of InputLock

Overall verdict

  • InputLock appears to be a useful utility for temporarily disabling keyboard and mouse input, which is handy for cleaning your devices, preventing accidental input during media playback, or keeping children and pets from disrupting your work. As a lightweight, single-purpose tool it does its job well, though users should always verify the app's safety and download it from the official source.

Why this product is good

  • It lets you lock your keyboard and mouse instantly, preventing accidental or unwanted input
  • Useful for safely cleaning your keyboard and screen without triggering commands
  • Lightweight and focused on a single task, so it's simple to use
  • Can prevent children or pets from interfering with your work or media playback
  • Typically offers a quick keyboard shortcut to lock and unlock input

Recommended for

  • People who want to clean their keyboard and mouse without accidental keystrokes
  • Parents wanting to childproof their computer during movies or presentations
  • Users who watch videos or media and want to avoid accidental input
  • Pet owners keeping animals from disrupting their screen or work
  • Anyone needing a simple, temporary input-lock utility

InputLock videos

No InputLock videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Codeship videos

LinuxFest Northwest 2017: Continuous Delivery to Microsoft Azure with Docker through Codeship

More videos:

  • Review - The Codeship --ย Continuous Deployment made simple

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to InputLock and Codeship)
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Continuous Integration
0 0%
100% 100
AI
100 100%
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using InputLock and Codeship. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare InputLock and Codeship

InputLock Reviews

We have no reviews of InputLock yet.
Be the first one to post

Codeship Reviews

The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
Codeship, a CI/CD platform based in the cloud, has an interface that is easy for users and it can integrate with numerous tools and services people are familiar with. It works well for different programming languages and platforms, which makes it suitable for many teams involved in development work.
Source: morninglif.com
Top 10 Most Popular Jenkins Alternatives for DevOps in 2024
CodeShip is a CloudBees SaaS platform that provides a managed CI/CD experience in the cloud. Itโ€™s designed to give control back to developers by providing a guided workflow for creating and maintaining CI/CD pipelines. This avoids much of the complexity thatโ€™s associated with Jenkins.
Source: spacelift.io
10 Jenkins Alternatives in 2021 for Developers
You could consider using CodeShip to help you to optimize CI/CD cloud deployment. CodeShip can be used by just about any type of development team that looks to increase the efficiency and automation of their code delivery. You can get started within minutes and gain access to an incredible amount of control when setting everything up. The customization options will seem...
The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
CodeShip is a hosted continuous integration and continuous delivery platform found by CloudBees. It provides fast feedback and customized environments to build applications. It provides integration with almost anything and is good at helping you scale as per your needs. It comes free for up to 100 monthly builds.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing InputLock and Codeship, you can also consider the following products

TalkTastic - Voice Keyboard that Understands Your Personal Context

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Type Switch - Effortless language switching on macOS with Type Switch.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Homerow - Spotlight for the macOS user interface

Travis CI - Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CIโ€™s precision syntaxโ€”all with the developer in mind.