Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Hyper VS Ice

Compare Hyper VS Ice and see what are their differences

Hyper

Extensible, cross-platform terminal built on open web standards.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
Ice

Develop in C++, C#, Java, JavaScript, MATLAB, Objective-C, PHP, Python, and Ruby. Deploy on Linux, macOS, Windows, Android, and iOS.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
Grapple
Do-It-Yourself Data Analytics & Business Intelligence, Powered by AI sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Hyper seems to be a lot more popular than Ice. While we know about 47 links to Hyper, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Ice.

social mentions
47 vs 2
Terminal Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 59

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Hyper
Ice
Website hyper.is zeroc.com
Pricing
Open source
Open source
Listed in
Terminal Tools Emulators Terminal Developer Tools +1
Productivity Mac Mac Tools Tool +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Hyper 5 features
Ice 0 features
  • Cross-Platform
    Hyper is available for multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it versatile for users on different platforms.
  • Extensibility
    Hyper is built on web technologies like JavaScript, HTML, and CSS, allowing users to customize and extend it with plugins and themes easily.
  • Modern UI
    It offers a sleek and modern user interface that is visually appealing and user-friendly.
  • Performance
    Despite being built on Electron, Hyper's performance is generally satisfactory for the majority of terminal tasks.
  • Ecosystem
    A rich ecosystem of plugins and themes is available, which enhances the terminal's functionality and customization options.

Possible disadvantages

  • Resource Usage
    As an Electron-based application, Hyper can consume more memory and CPU compared to more lightweight terminal emulators.
  • Startup Time
    Hyper may have a slower startup time compared to native terminal applications because it initializes a lot of components at launch.
  • Complexity
    For users who are not familiar with web development technologies, customizing and extending Hyper might be challenging.
  • Stability
    Occasional bugs and crashes can occur, especially when using numerous plugins or custom configurations.
  • Native Feature Gaps
    Some of the features available in native terminal emulators might be missing or less optimized in Hyper.

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Hyper
Ice

Overall verdict

  • Hyper is a good choice for users who value customization and a visually appealing interface over performance. While it may not match the speed and efficiency of native terminal applications, its flexibility and design appeal to those who are comfortable with and prefer Electron-based applications.

Why this product is good

  • Hyper is an electron-based terminal that is highly customizable, allowing users to enhance its functionality through plugins and themes. It's built with web technologies, making it easy for developers familiar with JavaScript, HTML, and CSS to contribute and modify. This enables a rich ecosystem of community contributions, offering users a wide variety of enhancements to tailor the terminal experience to their needs.

Recommended for

  • Developers who prefer a customizable terminal environment
  • Users who enjoy experimenting with plugins and themes
  • Individuals who prioritize design and aesthetics in their tooling

Overall verdict

  • ZeroC's Ice (Internet Communications Engine) is a mature, high-performance RPC framework that is well-regarded for building distributed and networked applications, offering robust features and cross-language support.

Why this product is good

  • Provides efficient, high-performance remote procedure calls (RPC) with a compact binary protocol
  • Supports many programming languages including C++, Java, C#, Python, JavaScript, and more, enabling cross-language interoperability
  • Includes a rich set of built-in services such as IceGrid for deployment, IceStorm for pub/sub messaging, and Glacier2 for firewall traversal and security
  • Offers strong security features including SSL/TLS encryption and authentication
  • Well-documented with a stable, battle-tested codebase used in production systems
  • Handles complex distributed computing concerns like load balancing, failover, and object lifecycle management

Recommended for

  • Developers building large-scale distributed systems and microservices
  • Applications requiring cross-language communication between heterogeneous components
  • Enterprise systems needing reliable, secure, and high-performance RPC
  • Real-time and low-latency networked applications such as gaming or financial systems
  • Teams that need built-in services for service discovery, messaging, and deployment management

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Hyper 3 videos + Add
Ice 3 videos + Add

Motorola One Hyper Review

More videos

  • - SKECHERS GOrun RAZOR 3 HYPER & GOrun 7 HYPER REVIEW | The Ginger Runner
  • - Motorola One Hyper "Real Review"

ICE Professional Review Preparation Course - An Overview

More videos

  • - The New High-Speed Train Germany LOVES to HATE! - DB ICE 4 Review
  • - Ice Planet Barbarians! (ADULT REVIEW)

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Hyper
Ice
100% 100%
Terminal Tools
0% 0%
0% 0%
Productivity
100% 100%
100% 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0%
0% 0%
Mac
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Hyper and Ice. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Hyper no reviews yet
Ice no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Ice yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Hyper 47 mentions
Ice 2 mentions
  • A Fig That Works Anywhere — FaiTerm
    This was Fig's smartest move. Every other approach at the time either forced you onto a brand-new terminal emulator (Warp, Tabby) or left you stuck with the weak completion of the day. Fig chose to piggyback instead — it supported macOS... - Source: dev.to / 22 days ago
  • Ratty – A terminal emulator with inline 3D graphics
    Or Terminal is already a full featured web browser? https://hyper.is/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Show HN: Hyper – Standards first React alternative
    I wish open-source projects checked to see if other projects share the same name. Especially since there are packages in NPM already about hyper. https://hyper.is/ has been around for a while and is kind of big. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

View more

  • The Rise and Fall of Corba (2006)
    We still don't have anything that can do what CORBA could do. Grpc doesn't even come close. If you are interested in this type of technology, I recommend looking at ZeroC's Ice. https://zeroc.com It's CORBA with all the warts removed,... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Strive for simplicity: sanctions, transactions and a big refactoring
    Are you saying: “This solution does not look particularly great”? Well, there's more. The system was not just your average, boring product, it was a modern and fancy distributed system, so it used a framework called Zeroc Ice. This is an... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

Alternatives to Hyper and Ice

When comparing Hyper and Ice, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...