Hurl.dev VS Requestly

• Ease of Use
  Hurl.dev provides a simple and intuitive interface to work with, making it easy for users to compose and test HTTP requests without dealing with the complexity of more advanced tools.
• Scripting Capabilities
  It offers powerful scripting capabilities using a straightforward syntax, allowing users to automate HTTP requests efficiently.
• Open Source
  Hurl.dev being open-source allows users to contribute to the development and improvement of the tool, as well as ensuring transparency and reliability.
• Flexibility
  The tool supports a wide range of HTTP methods and features, accommodating various testing needs and workflows.
• Integration
  Hurl.dev can easily integrate into existing CI/CD pipelines, streamlining automated testing processes.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Advanced Features
  Compared to more complex tools, Hurl.dev might lack some advanced features required for extensive API testing and analysis.
• Learning Curve for Scripting
  While Hurl.dev provides scripting capabilities, users unfamiliar with the syntax may face an initial learning curve.
• Community Support
  As a newer tool, it might have a smaller community, which can affect the availability of resources and support.
• Performance Limitations
  Hurl.dev may not handle very large or complex load testing scenarios as efficiently as dedicated load testing tools.
• Interface Limitations
  The command-line nature of the tool might not appeal to users who prefer graphical user interfaces for managing HTTP requests.

• Redirect URL
• Block Network Requests
• Modify Request & Response Header
• Modify Response
• Supercharge Selenium
• Session Replay
• Modify Query Params
• Team Workspace
• API Client
• API Mocks
• GraphQL Support
• Zero Setup
• Auto Capture Sessions
• Network Logs
• Console Logs

No analysis of Hurl.dev yet.

No Hurl.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Get Started with Requestly

More videos

We have no reviews of Hurl.dev yet. Be the first one to post

• Comparing Charles Proxy, Fiddler, Wireshark, and Requestly
  dev.to · Aug 2019

  On the pricing front, Requestly strikes a balance between affordability and functionality. It is an open-source tool, offering freemium to individual developers and affordable pricing plans for team collaboration. We...

• Postman silently auto-installs AI plugins and attempts to share all API data

  If you want to complicate your life just a little bit, there's hurl: https://hurl.dev/ The downside for me is that I have a filesystem littered with .hurl files and no real organization. But it's one step more organized than just curl. - Source: Hacker News / 6 days ago

• Show HN: Ghostman – A fast, keyboard-driven TUI API client and webhook inspector

  I’m a big fan of Hurl for this purpose. It’s just a thin declarative layer over curl. https://hurl.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 days ago

• Every invoice in Brazil's economy runs on SOAP 1.2. We mapped it all

  Https://hurl.dev is pretty neat. As others have mentioned already - Bruno is also lean, dependable and recently got .yml support. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago

View more

• Why You Need a Local-First API Client (With Hands-On Example)

  If you want to try a local-first workflow, you can start using Requestly here: https://requestly.com. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago

• How to use Cursor to Generate API Testcases in Requestly

  That’s where automation changes the game. By pairing Cursor, an AI-powered coding assistant, with Requestly's local-first API testing and mocking platform, you can offload the grunt work of writing tests to AI while keeping execution... - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago

• These 20 Awesome API Clients Will Change How You Work with APIs

  Requestly is a versatile browser extension and web client used to intercept, mock, and debug APIs in real-time—perfect for frontend developers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

View more