Software Alternatives & Startups

HTTPie VS Hurl.dev

Compare HTTPie VS Hurl.dev and see what are their differences

HTTPie

CLI HTTP that will make you smile. JSON support, syntax highlighting, wget-like downloads, extensions, and more.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Hurl.dev

Hurl is a command line tool that runs HTTP requests defined in a simple plain text format.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source

Which is more popular?

Hurl.dev might be a bit more popular than HTTPie. We know about 61 links to it since March 2021 and only 57 links to HTTPie.

social mentions
57 vs 61
API Tools popularity
71% vs 29%
alternatives listed
36 vs 13

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

HTTPie
Hurl.dev
Website httpie.io hurl.dev
Pricing
Open source
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

HTTPie 6 features
Hurl.dev 5 features
  • User-Friendly Syntax
    HTTPie offers a simplified and intuitive syntax for making HTTP requests compared to tools like curl. This makes it easier to use, especially for beginners.
  • JSON Support
    HTTPie automatically handles JSON data, making it simple to send and receive JSON payloads. It formats JSON responses in a readable way.
  • Cross-Platform
    HTTPie can be used on multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, ensuring broad compatibility.
  • Plugin Support
    HTTPie supports extensions and plugins that can extend its functionality, offering users the ability to customize their experience.
  • Automatic Headers
    Certain headers are automatically generated by HTTPie, reducing the need to manually specify common headers like Content-Type.
  • Color-coded Output
    The tool offers color-coded and formatted output, making it easier to read and debug HTTP responses.

Possible disadvantages

  • Performance
    HTTPie's performance may be slower compared to more stripped-down tools like curl due to its additional features and user-friendly design.
  • Dependency on Python
    HTTPie is a Python-based tool, requiring users to have Python installed. This may add complexity for users who do not already have a Python environment set up.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic usage is straightforward, getting the most out of HTTPie's advanced features may require additional learning.
  • Not Pre-Installed
    Unlike curl, HTTPie is not pre-installed on most Unix-based systems, requiring an extra step for installation.
  • Limited Raw Socket Options
    HTTPie lacks some low-level networking capabilities and raw socket options available in other tools, limiting its functionality for some advanced use cases.
  • Ease of Use
    Hurl.dev provides a simple and intuitive interface to work with, making it easy for users to compose and test HTTP requests without dealing with the complexity of more advanced tools.
  • Scripting Capabilities
    It offers powerful scripting capabilities using a straightforward syntax, allowing users to automate HTTP requests efficiently.
  • Open Source
    Hurl.dev being open-source allows users to contribute to the development and improvement of the tool, as well as ensuring transparency and reliability.
  • Flexibility
    The tool supports a wide range of HTTP methods and features, accommodating various testing needs and workflows.
  • Integration
    Hurl.dev can easily integrate into existing CI/CD pipelines, streamlining automated testing processes.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to more complex tools, Hurl.dev might lack some advanced features required for extensive API testing and analysis.
  • Learning Curve for Scripting
    While Hurl.dev provides scripting capabilities, users unfamiliar with the syntax may face an initial learning curve.
  • Community Support
    As a newer tool, it might have a smaller community, which can affect the availability of resources and support.
  • Performance Limitations
    Hurl.dev may not handle very large or complex load testing scenarios as efficiently as dedicated load testing tools.
  • Interface Limitations
    The command-line nature of the tool might not appeal to users who prefer graphical user interfaces for managing HTTP requests.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

HTTPie
Hurl.dev

Overall verdict

  • HTTPie is highly regarded by developers for its ease of use and powerful capabilities when dealing with APIs and web services. Its design focuses on making the command-line experience as seamless and productive as possible, making it a good choice for both beginners and experienced developers.

Why this product is good

  • HTTPie is popular due to its user-friendly command-line interface which simplifies making HTTP requests. It provides a more readable output compared to traditional tools like curl, highlighting syntax and formatting JSON responses nicely. It also supports plugins, which extend its functionality, and includes features like HTTPS by default, persistent sessions, and intuitive URL parsing.

Recommended for

  • Developers who frequently interact with RESTful APIs and require an efficient tool for testing and debugging.
  • Users who prefer a clean and human-friendly command-line interface.
  • Those who need a flexible tool that can be extended with plugins to suit specific needs.
  • Anyone looking for an alternative to curl with an emphasis on simplicity and readability.

No analysis of Hurl.dev yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

HTTPie 2 videos + Add
Hurl.dev 0 videos + Add

Testing REST APIs con HTTPie y Postman

More videos

  • - Testing REST APIs con HTTPie y Postman - Parte 3

No Hurl.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
HTTPie
Hurl.dev
71% 71%
29% 29%
55% 55%
45% 45%
100% 100%
CLI
0% 0%
67% 67%
33% 33%

User comments

Share your experience with using HTTPie and Hurl.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

HTTPie no reviews yet
Hurl.dev no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of Hurl.dev yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

HTTPie 57 mentions
Hurl.dev 61 mentions

View more

  • Every invoice in Brazil's economy runs on SOAP 1.2. We mapped it all
    Https://hurl.dev is pretty neat. As others have mentioned already - Bruno is also lean, dependable and recently got .yml support. - Source: Hacker News / 23 days ago
  • Show HN: APIs as First-Class Citizen
    }; ``` I've carefully studied tools like gRPC/TypeSpec, but I'm not entirely satisfied. Since I have prior experience writing parsers and code generation tools, I finally decided to create my own—[XIDL](https://github.com/xidl/xidl). I... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Hurl vs Postman: Git-Friendly API Testing With Proxy-Aware Egress (2026)
    If any of that sounds familiar, I’d recommend finally taking the big step and replacing your Postman collection with Hurl — a command-line HTTP test runner where tests are plain **.hurl** text files that live in Git. For this tutorial,... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

View more

Alternatives to HTTPie and Hurl.dev

When comparing HTTPie and Hurl.dev, you can also consider the following products.