Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

HttpMaster VS Hurl.dev

Compare HttpMaster VS Hurl.dev and see what are their differences

HttpMaster

HttpMaster is a professional software tool for testing and debugging HTTP applications, primarily aimed at REST API applications and web services.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium Free trial
Alternatives Is it good?
Hurl.dev

Hurl is a command line tool that runs HTTP requests defined in a simple plain text format.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
OutageDeck
Check the cloud and SaaS vendors your product depends on without opening every status page. Official-source timelines, observed uptime history, and alerts to email, Slack, Teams, Discord, or webhooks. Five-provider email alerts are free. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Hurl.dev seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 61 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 61
API Tools popularity
64% vs 36%
alternatives listed
104 vs 13

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

HttpMaster
Hurl.dev
Website httpmaster.net hurl.dev
Pricing
Freemium Free trial Official pricing
Open source
Platforms
Windows
—
Listed in
API Tools API Monitoring Tools HTTP Debugging Testing +3
Command Line Tools HTTP HTTP Test Tool Web Development Tools +1

About HttpMaster and Hurl.dev

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

HttpMaster
Hurl.dev

Core HttpMaster features are: * HttpMaster project to store complete definition of API calls in one single place. * Broad set of http properties. * Dynamic parameters to simulate variations of input data or create global API values. * Response data validation with logical expressions. * Request...

Read more about HttpMaster

No description of Hurl.dev yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

HttpMaster 14 features
Hurl.dev 5 features
  • HttpMaster project to store complete definition of API calls in one single place
  • Broad set of http properties
  • Dynamic parameters to simulate variations of input data or create global API values
  • Response data validation with logical expressions
  • Request chaining to use data from previous request with the next request
  • Extensive data upload support, including 'multipart/form-data'
  • Request data builder for creating request body with an optional dynamic parameters
  • Request item execution with detailed progress monitoring
  • Execution groups to create batches of requests
  • Comprehensive execution data review and management
  • Basic request tool
  • Command line interface
  • OpenAPI import
  • Prepare cURL commands
  • Ease of Use
    Hurl.dev provides a simple and intuitive interface to work with, making it easy for users to compose and test HTTP requests without dealing with the complexity of more advanced tools.
  • Scripting Capabilities
    It offers powerful scripting capabilities using a straightforward syntax, allowing users to automate HTTP requests efficiently.
  • Open Source
    Hurl.dev being open-source allows users to contribute to the development and improvement of the tool, as well as ensuring transparency and reliability.
  • Flexibility
    The tool supports a wide range of HTTP methods and features, accommodating various testing needs and workflows.
  • Integration
    Hurl.dev can easily integrate into existing CI/CD pipelines, streamlining automated testing processes.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to more complex tools, Hurl.dev might lack some advanced features required for extensive API testing and analysis.
  • Learning Curve for Scripting
    While Hurl.dev provides scripting capabilities, users unfamiliar with the syntax may face an initial learning curve.
  • Community Support
    As a newer tool, it might have a smaller community, which can affect the availability of resources and support.
  • Performance Limitations
    Hurl.dev may not handle very large or complex load testing scenarios as efficiently as dedicated load testing tools.
  • Interface Limitations
    The command-line nature of the tool might not appeal to users who prefer graphical user interfaces for managing HTTP requests.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

HttpMaster
Hurl.dev

Overall verdict

  • Overall, HttpMaster is a solid choice for individuals and teams looking for a reliable and efficient tool to test, debug, and document web applications and services.

Why this product is good

  • HttpMaster is considered a good tool because it offers comprehensive testing capabilities for web services and REST APIs. It provides developers and testers with features such as request chaining, parameterization, data validation, and response validation. It supports a wide array of HTTP methods and enables easy automation of testing processes with its command line interface. Additionally, it has a user-friendly interface that simplifies the construction of HTTP requests.

Recommended for

    HttpMaster is well-suited for developers, QA engineers, and testers who need to perform end-to-end testing of web APIs. It's particularly beneficial for those who require a versatile testing solution with both automated and manual testing features. It's also ideal for teams that need to validate the functionality, performance, and security of their web apps through an intuitive platform.

No analysis of Hurl.dev yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

HttpMaster 2 videos + Add
Hurl.dev 0 videos + Add

Testing with HttpMaster 02

More videos

  • - Web Services Testing with HTTP Master

No Hurl.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
HttpMaster
Hurl.dev
64% 64%
API Tools
36% 36%
0% 0%
Command Line Tools
100% 100%
53% 53%
Developer Tools
47% 47%
100% 100%
Development
0% 0%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing HttpMaster and Hurl.dev.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

HttpMaster's answer

Developers and testers.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

HttpMaster's answer

  • Microsoft
  • Oracle
  • Google

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

HttpMaster's answer

Performance, simple UI, resource friendly.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

HttpMaster's answer

Microsoft .NET.

User comments

Share your experience with using HttpMaster and Hurl.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

HttpMaster 0 mentions
Hurl.dev 61 mentions

Tracking HttpMaster since Mar 2021.

  • Every invoice in Brazil's economy runs on SOAP 1.2. We mapped it all
    Https://hurl.dev is pretty neat. As others have mentioned already - Bruno is also lean, dependable and recently got .yml support. - Source: Hacker News / 23 days ago
  • Show HN: APIs as First-Class Citizen
    }; ``` I've carefully studied tools like gRPC/TypeSpec, but I'm not entirely satisfied. Since I have prior experience writing parsers and code generation tools, I finally decided to create my own—[XIDL](https://github.com/xidl/xidl). I... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Hurl vs Postman: Git-Friendly API Testing With Proxy-Aware Egress (2026)
    If any of that sounds familiar, I’d recommend finally taking the big step and replacing your Postman collection with Hurl — a command-line HTTP test runner where tests are plain **.hurl** text files that live in Git. For this tutorial,... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

View more

Alternatives to HttpMaster and Hurl.dev

When comparing HttpMaster and Hurl.dev, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...